skip to main content
10.1145/2401603.2401611acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesracsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An artificial neural network based approach for sentiment analysis of opinionated text

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet and Web 2.0 social media have emerged as an important medium for expressing sentiments, opinions, evaluations, and reviews. Sentiment analysis or opinion mining is becoming an open research domain due to the abundance of discussion forums, Weblogs, e-commerce portals, social networking and content sharing sites where people tend to express their opinions. Sentiment Analysis involves classifying text documents based on the opinion expressed being positive or negative about a given topic. This paper proposes a sentiment classification model using back-propagation artificial neural network (BPANN). Information Gain and three popular sentiment lexicons are used to extract sentiment representing features that are then used to train and test the BPANN. This novel approach combines the strength of BPANN in classification accuracy with utilizing intrinsic domain knowledge available in the sentiment lexicons. The results obtained on the movie-review corpora have shown that the proposed approach has been able to reduce dimensionality, while producing accurate sentiment based classification of text.

References

  1. Annett, M., and Kondrak, G. A comparison of sentiment analysis techniques: Polarizing movie blogs. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, (2008), 5032, 25--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bai, X. Predicting consumer sentiments from online text. Decision Support Systems, 50, 4 (2011), 732--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Balog, K., Mishne, G., and de Rijke, M. Why are they excited?: Identifying and explaining spikes in blog mood levels. In Proceedings of EACL (Morristown, NJ, USA) ACL, 2006, 207--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boiy, E., Hens, P., Deschacht, K., and Moens, M. F. Automatic sentiment analysis of on-line text. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (Vienna, Austria) 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chevalier, J. A., and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 3 (2006), 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Conrad, J. G., and Schilder, F. Opinion mining in legal blogs. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '07) (New York) ACM, 2007, 231--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cui, H., Mittal, V., and Datar, M. Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In Proceedings of AAAI (Boston, Massachusetts, July 16--20, 2006). 2006, 1265--1270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., and Pennock, D. M. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 12th international WWW conference (Budapest, Hungary, May 20--24, 2003). 2003, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Decker, R., and Trusov, M. Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 4 (2010), 293--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ding, X., and Liu, B. The utility of linguistic rules in opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR '07) 2007, 811--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Esuli, A., and Sebastiani, F. Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. (CIKM '05) 2005, 617--624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., and Skiena, S. Large-scale sentiment analysis for news and blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM'07) 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatzivassiloglou, V., and McKeown, K. R. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the 35th ACL/8th EACL. 1997, 174--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hu, M., and Liu, B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (Seattle, WA, USA). ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kamps, J., Marx, M., Mokken, R. J., and De Rijke, M. Using wordnet to measure semantic orientations of adjectives. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Lisbon, PT). 2004, 1115--1118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang, H., Yoo, S. J., and Han, D. Senti-lexicon and improved Naïve Bayes algorithms for sentiment analysis of restaurant reviews. Expert Systems with Applications (2011), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Osherenko, A., and André, E. Lexical affect sensing: Are affect dictionaries necessary to analyze affect? In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII'07) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2007, 230--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paltoglou, G., Gobron, S., Skowron, M., Thelwall, M. and Thalmann, D. Sentiment analysis of informal textual communication in cyberspace. In Proceedings of Engage '10. 2010, 13--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pang, B., and Lee, L. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (Barcelona, Spain, July 21--26, 2004). 2004, 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pang, B., and Lee, L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1--2), (2008), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pang, B., and Lee, L. Seeing stars: exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the ACL (University of Michigan, USA, June 25--30, 2005). 2005, 115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pang, B., Lee, L., and Vaithyanathan, S. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing. ACL, 2002. Volume 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Prabowo, R., and Thelwall, M. Sentiment analysis: A combined approach. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), (2009), 143--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L. Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press Cambridge and the PDP Research Group, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., and Ogilvie, D. M. The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. MIT Press Cambridge, MA, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan, S., and Zhang, J. An empirical study of sentiment analysis for Chinese documents. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 4 (2008), 2622--2629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Thomas, M., Pang, B., and Lee, L. Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2006) (Sydney). 2006, 327--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tsytsarau, M., and Palpanas, T. Survey on mining subjective data on the web. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2011), 1--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Turney, P. D. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on ACL (ACL'02) (Morristown, NJ, USA) ACL, 2002, 417--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Turney, P. D., and Littman, M. L. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. on Info. Systems, 21, 4 (2003), 315--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wiebe, J. M. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence and 12th conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2000, 735--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhu, F., and Zhang, X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2 (2010), 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An artificial neural network based approach for sentiment analysis of opinionated text

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                RACS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Research in Applied Computation Symposium
                October 2012
                488 pages
                ISBN:9781450314923
                DOI:10.1145/2401603

                Copyright © 2012 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 23 October 2012

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,581submissions,25%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader