skip to main content
10.1145/2424321.2424356acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EcoMark: evaluating models of vehicular environmental impact

Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation is essential for achieving politically agreed upon emissions reduction targets that aim to combat global climate change. So-called eco-routing and eco-driving are able to substantially reduce GHG emissions caused by vehicular transportation. To enable these, it is necessary to be able to reliably quantify the emissions of vehicles as they travel in a spatial network. Thus, a number of models have been proposed that aim to quantify the emissions of a vehicle based on GPS data from the vehicle and a 3D model of the spatial network the vehicle travels in. We develop an evaluation framework, called EcoMark, for such environmental impact models. In addition, we survey all eleven state-of-the-art impact models known to us. To gain insight into the capabilities of the models and to understand the effectiveness of the EcoMark, we apply the framework to all models.

References

  1. Bing maps. http://www.bing.com/maps/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Energy and climate goals of china's 12th five-year plan. http://tinyurl.com/73mntqg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fact sheet: Australia's emissions reduction targets. http://tinyurl.com/7vpzufx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G8 plans 50% reduction in greenhouse gases. http://tinyurl.com/68hn2a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Google maps. http://maps.google.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. OpenStreetMap. http://www.openstreetmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reducing emissions from transport. http://tinyurl.com/7ex6am3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Road transport: Reducing co2 emissions from light-duty vehicles. http://tinyurl.com/6gtlzzz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shuttle radar topography mission. http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Usgs center for lidar information coordination and knowledge. http://lidar.cr.usgs.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. What is the eu doing on climate change? http://tinyurl.com/75qex2g.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, C. Zhang, W. Xie, X. Xie, G. Sun, and Y. Huang. T-drive: driving directions based on taxi trajectories. In GIS, pages 99--108. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Luxen and C. Vetter. Real-time routing with openstreetmap data. In GIS, pages 513--516. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Pfoser, S. Brakatsoulas, P. Brosch, M. Umlauft, N. Tryfona, and G. Tsironis. Dynamic travel time provision for road networks. In GIS, page 68. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Ahn and H. Rakha. The effects of route choice decisions on vehicle energy consumption and emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 13(3):151--167, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Ahn, H. Rakha, A. Trani, and M. Van Aerde. Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(2):182--190, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. ARB. EMFAC2007 version 2.30: Calculating emission inventories for vehicles in California. U.S. the California Air Resources Board (ARB), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Barkenbus. Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative. Energy Policy, 38(2):762--769, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Barth and K. Boriboonsomsin. Energy and emissions impacts of a freeway-based dynamic eco-driving system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(6):400--410, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. P. Boulter, I. McCrae, and T. Barlow. A review of instantaneous emission models for road vehicles. Transport Research Laboratory, Published Project Report 267, Final, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Bowyer, R. Akçelik, D. Biggs, and A. R. R. Board. Guide to Fuel Consumption Analyses for Urban Traffic Management. Technical report, Australian Road Research Board, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Cappiello. Modeling traffic flow emissions. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Cappiello, I. Chabini, E. K. Nam, A. Lue, and M. A. Zeid. A statistical model of vehicle emissions and fuel consumption. In The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pages 801--809. IEEE, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. E. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1(1):269--271, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. EEA. Copert 4 User Manual (version 5), Computer Programme to Calculate Emissions from Road Transport. European Environment Agency, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. EPA. User's Guide to MOBILE6, Mobile Source Emission Factor Model. U.S. EPA National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. EPA. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission Inventory Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity. U.S. EPA National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. Hausberger, M. Rexeis, M. Zallinger, and R. Luz. Emission factors from the model phem for the hbefa version 3, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Hickman, D. Hassel, R. Joumard, Z. Samaras, and S. Sorenson. Methodology for calculating transport emissions and energy consumption. TRL Report SE/491/98: Deliverable for EU project MEET, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. L. Jiménez-Palacios. Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDAS Remote Sensing. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. R. Joumard et al. Methods of estimation of atmospheric emissions from transport: European scientist network and scientific state-of-the-art. INRETS report LTE, 9901, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R. Joumard, P. Jost, J. Hickman, and D. Hassel. Hot passenger car emissions modelling as a function of instantaneous speed and acceleration. Science of the Total Environment, 169:167--174, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. T. Kono, T. Fushiki, K. Asada, and K. Nakano. Fuel consumption analysis and prediction model for "eco" route search. In 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America's 2008 Annual Meeting, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. W. Lei, H. Chen, and L. Lu. Microscopic Emission and Fuel Consumption Modeling for Light-duty Vehicles Using Portable Emission Measurement System Data. In World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pages 918--925, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. E. K. Nam and R. Giannelli. Fuel consumption modeling of conventional and advanced technology vehicles in the Physical Emission Rate Estimator (PERE). Technical report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. L. Ntziachristos, Z. Samaras, and E. E. Agency. COPERT III Computer programme to calculate emissions from road transport: methodology and emission factors (version 2.1). European Environment Agency, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. L. Pelkmans, P. Debal, T. Hood, G. Hauser, and M.-R. Delgado. Development of a simulation tool to calculate fuel consumption and emissions of vehicles operating in dynamic conditions. SAE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. F. Pereira, H. Costa, and N. Pereira. An off-line map-matching algorithm for incomplete map databases. European Transport Research Review, 1(3):107--124, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. T. Peucker, R. Fowler, J. Little, and D. Mark. The triangulated irregular network. In Amer. Soc. Photogrammetry Proc. Digital Terrain Models Symposium, volume 516, page 532, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Rakha, K. Ahn, K. Moran, B. Saerens, and E. Van den Bulck. Virginia tech comprehensive power-based fuel consumption model: Model development and testing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, pages 492--503, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. H. Rakha, K. Ahn, and A. Trani. Comparison of MOBILE5a, MOBILE6, VT-MICRO, and CMEM models for estimating hot-stabilized light-duty gasoline vehicle emissions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30(6):1010--1021, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. H. Rakha, K. Ahn, and A. Trani. Development of VT-Micro model for estimating hot stabilized light duty vehicle and truck emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9(1):49--74, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. G. Scora and M. Barth. Comprehensive Modal Emission Model (CMEM), Version 3.01 UserŠs Guide. University of California Riverside Center for Environmental Research and Technology, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. G. Song, L. Yu, and Z. Wang. Aggregate Fuel Consumption Model of Light-Duty Vehicles for Evaluating Effectiveness of Traffic Management Strategies on Fuels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135:611--618, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. G. Tavares, Z. Zsigraiova, V. Semiao, and M. Carvalho. Optimisation of MSW collection routes for minimum fuel consumption using 3D GIS modelling. Waste Management, 29(3):1176--1185, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. H. Teng, L. Yu, and Y. Qi. Statistical Microscale Emission Models Incorporating Acceleration and Deceleration. In 81st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. EcoMark: evaluating models of vehicular environmental impact

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '12: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2012
      642 pages
      ISBN:9781450316910
      DOI:10.1145/2424321

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader