skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468474acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

EEG-based assessment of video and in-game learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

People often learn game-related information in video games by taking turns playing and watching each other play. This type of in-game learning involves both observation and imitation of actions. However, games are also made to be learnt individually during gameplay. Our study seeks to assess which is more effective for learning: just playing a game yourself or watching somebody play it first. We compare two gameplay situations: playing a digital game before watching a game-play video and playing a digital game after watching a gameplay video. Using a between-participants design, to measure learning effectiveness we recorded Mu rhythms, which are indirectly linked to mirror neuron activation during imitation learning. We also analyze hemispheric frontal alpha asymmetry. Our results indicate that presentation order of the video game matters and players are more aroused when watching a gameplay video before playing.

References

  1. E. Andersen, E. O'Rourke, Y.-E. Liu, R. Snider, J. Lowdermilk, D. Truong, S. Cooper, and Z. Popovic, The impact of tutorials on games of varying complexity. In: Proc. of CHI'12, 2012, pp. 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Salminen, M., Kivikangas, J.M., Ravaja, N., Kallinen, K., Frontal EEG Asymmetry in the Study of Player Experiences during Competitive and Cooperative Play. In: Proc. of IADIS GET, 2009, pp. 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A., Jeffrey, R., Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. J Pers Soc Psychol, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 122--130, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Brody, B. Lahey, and M. Combs, "Effects of intermittent modelling on observational learning," J Appl Behav Anal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87--90, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Rizzolatti, L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, and L. Fogassi, "Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions," Cognitive brain research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131--141, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, vol. 27,pp. 169--92,2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Keysers and V. Gazzola, "Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations.," Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 666--71, Dec. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Rizzolatti, "Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action," Nat Rev Neurosci, vol.2, no.9, pp. 1--10, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. E. R. Ulloa and J. a Pineda, "Recognition of point-light biological motion: mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity.," Behavioural brain research, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 188--94, Dec. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Verona, N. Sadeh, and J. J. Curtin, "Stress-induced asymmetric frontal brain activity and aggression risk.," Journal of abnormal psychology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 131--45, Feb. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. a Coan and J. J. B. Allen, "Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion.," Biological psychology, vol. 67, no. 1--2, pp. 7--49, Oct. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Coluccia and G. Louse, "Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review," J Environ Psychol, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 329--340, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. G. G. Cacioppo, John T., Tassinary, Louis G., Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Salminen and N. Ravaja, "Increased oscillatory theta activation evoked by violent digital game events.," Neuroscience letters, vol. 435, no. 1, pp. 69--72, Apr. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Koster, R., A theory of fun for game design. Paraglyph Press, Phoenix, AR, 2005. \ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EEG-based assessment of video and in-game learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2013
        3360 pages
        ISBN:9781450319522
        DOI:10.1145/2468356

        Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 April 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader