skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466476acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Public displays and projections are becoming increasingly available in various informal urban settings. However, their potential impact on informing and engaging citizens on relevant issues has still been largely unexplored. In this paper, we show that visualizations displayed in public settings are able to increase social awareness and discourse by exposing underlying patterns in data that is submitted by citizens. We thus introduce the design and evaluation of Reveal-it!, a public, interactive projection that facilitates the comparison of the energy consumptions of individuals and communities. Our in-the-wild deployment in three distinct physical locations provided insights into: 1) how people responded to this form of display in different contexts; 2) how it influenced people's perception and discussion of individual and communal data; and 3) the implications for a public visualization as a tool for increasing awareness and discourse. We conclude by discussing emerging participant behaviors, as well as some challenges involved in facilitating a socially motivated crowd-sourced visualization in the public context.

References

  1. Ananny, M. and Strohecker, C. TexTales: Creating Interactive Forums with Urban Publics. In Foth, M. ed. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Backlund, S., Gustafsson, A., Gyllenswärd, M., Ilstedt- Hjelm, S., Mazé, R. and Redström, J. Static! The Aesthetics of Energy in Everyday Things. In Proc. DRS 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A. and Swenton-Wall, P. Participatory Design-Principles and Practices. Ch. Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design, Lawrence Erlbaum, 123--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodker, S. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proc. NordiCHI 2006, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Breinbjerg, M., Riis, M. S., Ebsen, T., and Lunding, R. Experiencing the Non-sensuous. In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, 611--614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Proc. INTERACT 2003, 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Broms, L., Katzeff, C., Beng, Magnus, M., Nyblom, S., Hjelm, S., and Ehrnberger, K. Coffee Maker Patterns and the Design of Energy Feedback Artefacts. In Proc. DIS 2010, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Churchill, E. F., Nelson, L., Denoue, L. and Girgensohn, A. The Plasma Poster Network: Posting Multimedia Content in Public Places. In Proc. of INTERACT 2003, 599--606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalsgaard, P., and Halskov, K. Designing Urban Media Façades : Cases and Challenges. In Proc. CHI 2010, 2277--2286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dalsgaard, P., Nielsen, R. and Halskov, K.: Towards a Design Space Explorer for Media Facades. In Proc. OZCHI 2008, 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Danis, C., Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M. and Kriss, J. Your Place or Mine?: Visualization as a Community Component. In Proc. CHI 2008, 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Donath, J., Karahalios, K. and Viegas, F. Visualizing conversations. Computer-Mediated Communication 4, 4 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dourish, P. and Christine, S. The Moral Economy of Social Media. In Foth, M., Forlano, L., Satchell, C. and Gibbs, M. (Eds.) From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement (2011), MIT Press, 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatah Gen. Schieck, A., Briones, C. and Mottram, C. The Urban Screen as a Socializing Platform: Exploring the Role of Place within the Urban Space. In F. Eckardt, J. Geelhaar, L. Colini, K. S. Willis, K. Chorianopoulos and R. Hennig (Eds.) MediaCity: Situations, Practices and Encounters (2008), Frank & Timme GmbH, 285--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Festinger, L. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. In Human Relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fritsch, J. and Brynskov, M. Between Engagement, Affect and Information - Experimental Urban Media in the Climate Change Debate. In Foth, M., Forlano, L., Gibbs, M., & Satchell, C. (Eds.). From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement (2011), MIT Press, 115--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Using social visualization to motivate social production. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia - Special section on communities and media computing 11, 3 (2009), 413--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Grasso, A., Muehlenbrock, M., Roulland, F., and Snowdon, D. Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, Ch. 11: Supporting Communities of Practice with Large Screen Displays (2003), Springer, 261--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenfield, A., Shepard, M.: Urban Computing and Its Discontents. The Architectural League of New York, New York (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing Space: the Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. In Proc. CSCW 1996, 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. He, H., Greenberg, S. and Huang, E. One Size Does Not Fit All: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design. In Proc. CHI 2010, 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hinrichs, U., Schmidt, H., and Carpendale, S EMDialog: Bringing Information Visualization into the Museum. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6 (2008), 1181--1189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hinrichs, U., Valkanova, N., Kuikkaniemi, K., Jacucci, G., Carpendale,S. and Arroyo, E. Large Displays in Urban Life. From Exhibition Halls to Media Facades. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, 2433--2436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Holmes, T. Eco-Visualization: Combining Art and Technology to Reduce Energy Consumption. In Proc. C&C 2007, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jancke, G. Venolia, G., Grudin, J., Cadiz, J. and Gupta. J. Linking Public Spaces: Technical and Social Issues. In Proc. CHI 2001, 530--537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kim, T., Hong, H. and Magerko, B., Design Requirements for Ambient Display that Supports Sustainable Lifestyle. In. Proc. DIS 2010, 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. Participatory Sensing in Public Spaces: Activating Urban Surfaces with Sensor Probes. In Proc. DIS 2010, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kuznetsov, S., Davis, G. N., Paulos, E., Gross, M. D., and Cheung, J. C. Red Balloon, Green Balloon, Sensors in the Sky. In Proc. UbiComp 2011, 237--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. McCarthy, F. Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, Ch. 12: Promoting a Sense of Community with Ubiquitous Peripheral displays (2003), Springer, 283--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. McCullough, M. On Typologies of Situated Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 2-4 (2001), 336--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D. and Schmidt, A. Requirements and design space for interactive public displays. In Proc. MM 2010, 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nuage Vert. http://www.pixelache.ac/nuage-blog/. Visited Sept., 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierce, J., Schiano, D. and Paulos, E. Home, Habits, and Energy: Examining Domestic Interactions and Energy Consumption. In Proc. CHI 2010, 1985--1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pousman, Z., and Stasko, J. A Taxonomy of Ambient Information Systems: Four Patterns of Design. In Proc. AVI 2006, 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Redstrom, J., Skog, T., and Hallanas, L. Informative Art: Using Amplified Artworks as Information Displays. In Proc. DARE 2000, 103--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Roberts, S., Humphries, H., Hyldon, V.: Consumer Preferences for Improving Energy Consumption Feedback. Report to Ofgem, Centre for Sustainable Energy (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodgers, J., and Bartram, L. Exploring Ambient and Artistic Visualization for Residential Energy Use Feedback. In Proc. INFOVIS 2011, 2489--2497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Schroeter, R., Foth, M. and Satchell, C. People, Content, Location: Sweet Spotting Urban Screens for Situated Engagement. In Proc. DIS 2012, 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Skog, T., Ljungblad, S. and Holmquist, L. E. Between Aesthetics and Utility: Designing Ambient Information Visualizations. In Proc. INFOVIS 2003, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Stasko, J. SunBurst Project. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/ii/sunburst/(2000). Visited Sept. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Struppek, M. The Social Potential of Urban Screens. In Journal for Visual Communication 5, 2 (2007), 173--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Townsend, A., Maguire, R., Liebhold, M. and Crawford, M. The Future of Cities, Information, and Inclusion. Report for the Rockefeller Foundation Institute of the Future. Available at http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/publications/future-cities-information-inclusionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Valkanova, N., Arroyo, E. Blat, J. The Visitors: Designing Media Façades to Support Links Between People and Places. In Proc. IASDR 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Valkanova, N., Moghnieh, A., Arroyo, E., and Blat, J. AmbientNEWS: Augmenting Information Discovery in Complex Settings through Aesthetic Design. In Proc. IV 2010, 439--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Vande Moere, A., Tomitsch, M., Hoinkis, M., Trefz, E., Johansen, S., and Jones, A. Comparative Feedback in the Street: Exposing Residential Energy Consumption on House Facades. In Proc. INTERACT 2011, 470--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Viégas, F., Perry, E. Howe, E. Donath, J. Artifacts of the Presence Era: Using Information Visualization to Create an Evocative Souvenir. In Proc. INFOVIS 2004, 105--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Visualizar'11: Understanding Infrastructures (2011). http://medialab-prado.es/article/visualizar11_taller_seminario.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R. Interactive Public Ambient Displays: Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users. In Proc. UIST 2004, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ware, C. Visual Thinking for Design. In Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Watermarks Project. http://watermarksproject.org/project.html. Visited Sept. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Wattenberg, M. Babynames, Visualization, and Social Data Analysis. In Proc. INFOVIS 2005, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader