skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Don't hide in the crowd!: increasing social transparency between peer workers improves crowdsourcing outcomes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper studied how social transparency and different peer-dependent reward schemes (i.e., individual, teamwork, and competition) affect the outcomes of crowdsourcing. The results showed that when social transparency was increased by asking otherwise anonymous workers to share their demographic information (e.g., name, nationality) to the paired worker, they performed significantly better. A more detailed analysis showed that in a teamwork reward scheme, in which the reward of the paired workers depended only on the collective outcomes, increasing social transparency could offset effects of social loafing by making them more accountable to their teammates. In a competition reward scheme, in which workers competed against each other and the reward depended on how much they outperformed their opponent, increasing social transparency could augment effects of social facilitation by providing more incentives for them to outperform their opponent. The results suggested that a careful combination of methods that increase social transparency and different reward schemes can significantly improve crowdsourcing outcomes.

References

  1. Alonso, O., Rose, D. E., and Stewart, B. Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation. SIGIR Forum 42, 2 (Nov. 2008), 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., and Rasul, I. Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 3 (2005), 917--962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., and Hartmann, B. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, ACM (2012), 1013--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M., and Wolf, T. Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Commun. ACM 45, 4 (Apr. 2002), 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. A. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (Mar. 2000), 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harkins, S. G. Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23, 1 (1987), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Howe, J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine (06 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, S.-W., and Fu, W.-T. Systematic analysis of output agreement games: Effects of gaming environment, social interaction, and feedback. In Proceedings of HCOMP12: The 4th Workshop on Human Computation (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, S.-W., and Fu, W.-T. Enhancing reliability using peer consistency evaluation in human computation. In Proceedings of the ACM 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '13, ACM (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ipeirotis, P. G., Provost, F., and Wang, J. Quality management on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, HCOMP '10, ACM (2010), 64--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karau, S., and Williams, K. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 4 (1993), 681--706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kerr, N. L. Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1983), 819--828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., and Kraut, R. E. Crowdforge: crowdsourcing complex work. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, UIST '11, ACM (2011), 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kittur, A., Suh, B., and Chi, E. H. Can you ever trust a wiki?: impacting perceived trustworthiness in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '08, ACM (2008), 477--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Law, E., and Von Ahn, L. Human Computation. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mas, A., and Moretti, E. Peers at work. Working Paper 12508, National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mason, W., and Watts, D. J. Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds". SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 2 (May 2010), 100--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Millen, D. R., and Patterson, J. F. Identity disclosure and the creation of social capital. In CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '03, ACM (2003), 720--721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A., and Novak, R. Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of personality and social psychology 89, 5 (2005), 747.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Quinn, A. J., and Bederson, B. B. Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '11, ACM (2011), 1403--1412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Robertson, S., Vojnovic, M., and Weber, I. Rethinking the esp game. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '09, ACM (2009), 3937--3942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., and Ng, A. Y. Cheap and fast - but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '08, Association for Computational Linguistics (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2008), 254--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stuart, H. C., Dabbish, L., Kiesler, S., Kinnaird, P., and Kang, R. Social transparency in networked information exchange: a theoretical framework. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, ACM (2012), 451--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Suh, B., Chi, E. H., Kittur, A., and Pendleton, B. A. Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in wikipedia with wikidashboard. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '08 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. von Ahn, L., and Dabbish, L. Labeling images with a computer game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '04, ACM (2004), 319--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. von Ahn, L., and Dabbish, L. Designing games with a purpose. Commun. ACM 51 (Aug. 2008), 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zajonc, R. Social facilitation. Science 17 (1965), 65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Don't hide in the crowd!: increasing social transparency between peer workers improves crowdsourcing outcomes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader