skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2488133acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the subjectivity and bias of web content credibility evaluations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the initial outcomes of the Reconcile1 study concerning Web content credibility evaluations. The study was run with a balanced sample of 1503 respondents who independently evaluated 154 web pages from several thematic categories. Users taking part in the study not only evaluated credibility, but also filled a questionnaire covering additional respondents' traits. Using the gathered information about socio-economic status and psychological features of the users, we studied the influence of subjectivity and bias in the credibility ratings. Subjectivity and bias, in fact, represent a key design issue for Web Credibility systems, to the extent that they could jeopardize the system performance if not taken into account.

We found out that evaluations of Web content credibility are slightly subjective. On the other hand, the evaluations exhibit a strong acquiescence bias.

References

  1. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., and Poblete, B., 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proc. of WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cavarlee, J. and Liu, L., 2007. Countering Web spam with credibility-based link analysis. PODC 2007, 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hsu, C., Khabiri, E., and Caverlee, J., 2009. Ranking Comments on the Social Web. In Proc. of CSE, Volume 04, pages 90--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Diaz, J. A., Griffith, R. A., Ng, J. J., Reinert, S. E., Friedmann, P. D. and Moulton, A. W., 2002. Patients' Use of the Internet for Medical Information. Journal of General Internal Medicine, volume 17: pages 180--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fogg, B. J., 2003. Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. In Proc. of CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., and Tauber, E. R., 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. In Proc. of DUX. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gyöngyi, Z., Garcia-Molina, H, Pedersen, J., 2004. Combating web spam with trustrank. In Proc. of VLDB. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hargittai, E., and Hsieh, Y. P., 2011. Succinct Survey Measures of Web-Use Skills, Social Science Computer Review, February 2012 30: 95--107, first published on February 28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Landis, J. R., Koch, G. G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Schwarz, J., and Morris, M., 2011. Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment. In Proc. of CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Parikshit Sondhi, V. G. Vinod Vydiswaran, and ChengXiang Zhai, 2012. Reliability prediction of webpages in the medical domain. In Proc. of ECIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Surowiecki, J., The Wisdom of Crowds, Anchor, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Wagner, C., and Vinaimont, T., 2010. Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. In Proceedings of Issues in Information Systems, volume XI, no. 1, pages.724--732.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamamoto, Y., and Tanaka, K., 2011. Enhancing credibility judgment of web search results. In Proc. ofGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the subjectivity and bias of web content credibility evaluations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
          May 2013
          1636 pages
          ISBN:9781450320382
          DOI:10.1145/2487788

          Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 May 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate831of1,250submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader