skip to main content
10.1145/2490257.2490278acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Virtual communities of inquiry (VCoI) for learning basic algorithmic structures with open simulator and Scratch4OS: a case study from the secondary education in Greece

Published:19 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid penetration of "open source" virtual worlds (VWs) on the configuration and development of three-dimensional (3D) multi-user virtual platforms, in conjunction with interfaces of two-dimensional (2D) educational environments to learn novice users basic algorithmic structures were currently the central axis that exposed for investigation in our study. Notwithstanding the radical restructuring of instructional formats with VWs, like Open Simulator (Open Sim); however the disambiguation of students' presence indicators which are positively correlated to their meaningful engagement in Computer Science courses in a virtual community of inquiry (VCoI) is still lacking. In fact, for the requirements of these courses we had configured specific collaborative virtual areas in order to be explored and utilized from students a variety of non-uniform geometric solids from Open Sim and to be constructed a 3D (assembled) "mind trap" puzzle. Alongside, each piece of this puzzle was programmed according to a specific serial sequence with Scratch for Open Sim (Scratch4OS). The current case study seeks to present firstly a valuable framework for the implementation of the teaching and learning process in a VW, and subsequently the results from linear correlations between the cognitive, social and teaching presence of a VCoI from eighty-one (81) students of the Greek Secondary Education. The study findings indicated that the social presence (communication and cohesiveness of a group) don't only have a direct correlation with the cognitive presence (learning process for the construction of knowledge), but also has a positive association with the teaching presence (organization, planning and guidance of learning activities in the 3D space), and compulsory reinforced both of them. The added value of this study highlights the fundamental issues of the cooperation, socialization, retention and attendance rates between members of a VCoI which avouch multiple dimensions encircle or empower students' managerial and learning responsibilities based on the affordances that a 3D technology-enhanced environment can replicate.

References

  1. Akyol, Z. & Vaughan, N. & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Inter. Learn. Env. J., 19(3), 231--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing environment. J. of Asyn. Lear. Net., 5, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelaina, S. & Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). Analyzing students' engagement and learning presence in an educational blog community. Educ. Med. Inter. J., 49(3), 183--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arbaugh, B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, R., Garrison, R., Ice, P., Richardson, C., & Swan, P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Int. and High. Educ. J., 11(3-4), 133--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Berns, A., Gonzalez-Pardo, A. & Camacho, D. (2013). Game-like language learning in 3-D virtual environments. Com. & Educ. J., 60(1), 210--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Burgess, M., Slate, J., Rojas-Lebouef, A. & Laprairie, K., 2010. Teaching and learning in Second Life: using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. The Int. and High. Educ. J., 13(1), 84--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dalgarno, B. & Lee, M. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3D virtual environments? Br. J. of Educ.Tech., 41(1), 10--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. De la Varre, C., Keane, J. & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual Perspectives on the Contribution of On-Site Facilitators to Teaching Presence in a Blended Learning Environment. The J. of Dist. Educ., 25(3), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. De Lucas, Y., Burneo, Y. de Lucas, R. Pérez López, D. & Fernáández Prieto, M. S. (2012). Generating new collaborative learning environments in Primary education using Scratch ICERI2012 International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 58--67). Barcelona, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. de Freitas, S. & Griffiths, M. D. (2012) Massively multiplayer online role play games to support learning and training communities. In R. Ferdig (ed.), Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education (pp. 779--792). Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dohi, H. & Ishizuka, M. (2010). An interactive presentation system in a 3D system using Open Sim server. Proceedings of the IEEJ Image Electronics and visual computing Workshop (pp. 331--335). Nice, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrison, R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Inter. and High. Educ., 2(2/3), 87--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching and learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrison, R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. The Amer. J. of Dist. Educ., 15, 7--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Girvan, C., Tagney, B. & Savage, T. (2013). SLurtles: Supporting constructionist learning in Second Life. Comp. & Educ. J., 61(1), 115--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Girard, C., Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. J. of Comp. Ass. Learn. 29, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanuka, H. & Anderson, T. (1998). On-line social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. J. of Dist. Educ., 13(1), 57--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Comp. & Educ., 55(2), 808--820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowenthal, P. R. & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From Pixel on a Screen to Real Person in Your Students' Lives: Establishing Social Presence Using Digital Storytelling. The Inter. and High. Educ., 13(1), 70--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. McKerlich, R. & Anderson, T. (2008). Community of inquiry and learning in immersive virtual environments. J. of Asyn. Lear. Net. 11(4), 35--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, B. (2009). Designing serious games for foreign language education in a global perspective. Sup. for Learn. J., 715--719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Papert, S. (1980b). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pellas, N. (2012). Towards a beneficial formalization of cyber entities' interactions during the e-learning process in the virtual world of "Second Life". In P. Renna (Ed.), Production and Manufacturing System Management: Coordination approaches and multi-site Planning (pp. 242--277). Hershey, PA: Engineering Science Reference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pellas, N. & Kazanidis, I. (2012). Re-thinking a Cognitive presence framework for the utilization and transferability of the Jigsaw technique in open source virtual worlds. Bul. of the Techn. Com. on Learn. Techn. J., 14(3), 24--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pellas, N. & Kazanidis, I. (2013). E-learning quality through Second Life: Exploiting, investigating and evaluating the efficiency parameters of collaborative activities in Higher Education. In V. Bryan & V. Wang (Ed.), Technology Use and Research Approaches for Community Education and Professional Development (pp. 250--273). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Prensky, M. (2008). Backup education? Too many teachers see education as preparing kids for the past, not the future. Educ. Tech. J., 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernadez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmound, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B. & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Com. of the ACM, 52(11), 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rico, M., Martinez-Muρoz, G., Alaman, X., Camacho, D. & Pulido, E. (2011). Improving the Programming Experience of High School Students by Means of Virtual Worlds. Inter. J. of Eng. Educ., 27(1), 52--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Saito, H. & K. Miwa (2007). Construction of a learning environment supporting learners' reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web. Comp. & Educ. J., 49(2), 214--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Comp. & Educ. J., 59(2), 316--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Ment., 2, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Traphagan, T., Chiang, Y., Chang, M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M., Woo, J., Yoon, H., Jee, M. & Resta, P. (2010). Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat. Comp. & Educ. 55, 923--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Vosinakis, S. & Koutsabasis, P. (2012). Problem-Based Learning for Design & Engineering Activities in Virtual Worlds. PRESENCE: Teleop. & Virt. Envir., 21(3), 338--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhang, Q., Marksbury, N. & Heim, S. (2010). A Case Study of Communication and Social Interactions in Learning in Second Life. In Proceedings of HICSS'09 - 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (pp. 1--9). Hawaii. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Westera W., Nadolski R., Hummel H. & Wopereis I. (2008). Serious games for higher education: a framework for reducing design complexity. J. of Comp. Ass. Learn. 24, 420--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Virtual communities of inquiry (VCoI) for learning basic algorithmic structures with open simulator and Scratch4OS: a case study from the secondary education in Greece

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        BCI '13: Proceedings of the 6th Balkan Conference in Informatics
        September 2013
        293 pages
        ISBN:9781450318518
        DOI:10.1145/2490257

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 September 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        BCI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate41of103submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate97of250submissions,39%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader