ABSTRACT
In this paper we present CODIPHY or Composing On-Demand Intelligent Physical Layers that aims to solve two fundamental problems in practical cognitive radio networks: Collaboration between two radio physical layers (PHY) with varying capabilities to agree on a common communication protocol and provide a method to compose a functioning software defined radio (SDR) from a set of pre-compiled libraries. Both solutions use an ontology based description of the internal structure of the radio subsystems and use the high-level dataflow represented by the ontology to target heterogeneous platforms. CODIPHY isolates the various domains of radio engineering but still allows them to share domain knowledge to achieve a common goal of radio adaptation. Automating this process through declarative specification and collaborative learning is the goal of this paper. We present a generic methodology to facilitate the concept of CODIPHY and present examples from the radio PHY domain.
- Xilinx Partial Reconfiguration: http://www.xilinx.com/tools/partial-reconfiguration.htm.Google Scholar
- Description of the Cognitive Radio Ontology. Wireless Innovation Forum, (September), 2010.Google Scholar
- I. P. Conference, N. Drummond, M. Horridge, and H. Knublauch. Protégé-OWL Tutorial. (July):1--41, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. Dutta, J. Fifield, G. Schelle, D. Grunwald, and D. Sicker. An Intelligent Physical Layer For Cognitive Radio Networks. In WICON '08: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Wireless internet, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Dutta, D. Saha, D. Grunwald, and D. Sicker. SMACK: a SMart ACKnowledgment scheme for broadcast messages in wireless networks. SIGCOMM '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 conference on Data communication, 39(4):15--26, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fifield, P. Kasemir, D. Grunwald, and D. Sicker. Experiences with a platform for frequency agile techniques. In DYSPAN, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. M. M. Kokar and L. Lechowicz. Language Issues for Cognitive Radio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(4), 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Li and M. M. Kokar. Now Radios Can Understand Each Other : Modeling Language for Mobility. (1), 2008.Google Scholar
- S. Li, J. Moskal, M. M. Kokar, and D. Brady. An implementation of collaborative adaptation of cognitive radio parameters using an ontology and policy based approach. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 69(2--3):283--296, July 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Lin, H. Lee, M. Woh, Y. Harel, S. Mahlke, T. Mudge, C. Chakrabarti, and K. Flautner. SODA: A Low-power Architecture For Software Radio. In ISCA '06: Proceedings of the 33rd annual international symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 89--101, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. B. M. Kokar, D. Brady. Role of Ontologies in Cognitive Radios. In B. A. Fette, editor, Cognitive Radio Technology, chapter 13, pages 401--428. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Mitola III and H. Man. Semantics in Cognitive Radio. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, pages 261--266, Sept. 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Murphy, A. Sabharwal, and B. Aazhang. Design of WARP: A Flexible Wireless Open-Access Research Platform. In Proceedings of EUSIPCO, 2006.Google Scholar
- U. of Manchester. OWL API.Google Scholar
- G. Panesar, D. Towner, A. Duller, A. Gray, and W. Robbins. Deterministic parallel processing. Int. J. Parallel Program., 34(4):323--341, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Rahul, N. Kushman, D. Katabi, C. Sodini, and F. Edalat. Learning to Share: Narrowband-Friendly Wideband Networks. In SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication, pages 147--158, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Sen, R. Roy Choudhury, and S. Nelakuditi. No time to countdown. In Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking - MobiCom '11, page 241, New York, New York, USA, Sept. 2011. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. M. . K. Shujun Li and J. Moskal. Policy-driven Ontology-based Radio: A Public Safety Use Case. Proceedings of the Software Defined Radio Technical and Product Exposition Forum, 2008.Google Scholar
- K. Tan, J. Zhang, J. Fang, H. Liu, Y. Ye, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Wu, W. Wang, and G. M. Voelker. Sora: high performance software radio using general purpose multi-core processors. In NSDI'09: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX symposium on Networked systems design and implementation, pages 75--90, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009. USENIX Association. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W3C. OWL Web Ontology Language - http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.Google Scholar
- Xilinx. ZYNC Processing Platform.Google Scholar
- Xilinx. Xilinx System Generator for DSP Reference Guide, 2012.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- CODIPHY: composing on-demand intelligent physical layers
Recommendations
A software-defined radio based cognitive radio demonstration over FM band
IWCMC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World WirelesslyIn this paper, we present a software defined radio (SDR) based cognitive radio implementation and demonstration. Using GNU Radio and USRP SDR boards, we implement and demonstrate a cognitive radio that detects spectrum holes in the FM band and exploits ...
Aggressive cognitive radio (ACR): how to make your own white space
MobiHoc '09: Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computingThis demonstration will show the versatility of an agile cognitive radio platform in a non-cooperative communication scenario. The techniques proposed for an Aggressive Cognitive Radio (ACR) including parking on unused spectrum, monitoring users to ...
A comparative study of cognitive radio platforms
MEDES '12: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystemsCognitive radio (CR) technology has become one of the buzzwords within the wireless communications community over the past 12 years. Its ability to learn, decide and adapt to the external environment made CR attractive to regulators, researchers, ...
Comments