skip to main content
10.1145/2494068.2494069acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Colledge: a vision of collaborative knowledge networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

More and more semantic information has become available as RDF data recently, with the linked open data cloud as a prominent example. However, participating in the Semantic Web is cumbersome. Typically several steps are involved in using semantic knowledge. Information is first acquired, e.g. by information extraction, crowd sourcing or human experts. Then ontologies are published and distributed. Users may apply reasoning and otherwise modify their local ontology instances. However, currently these steps are treated separately and although each involves human effort, nearly no synergy effect is used and it is also mostly a one way process, e.g. user feedback hardly flows back into the main ontology version. Similarly, user cooperation is low.

While there are approaches alleviating some of these limitations, e.g. extracting information at query time, personalizing queries, and integration of user feedback, this work combines all the pieces envisioning a social knowledge network that enables collaborative knowledge generation and exchange. Each aforementioned step is seen as a particular implementation of a network node responding to knowledge queries in its own way, e.g. by extracting it, applying reasoning or asking users, and learning from knowledge exchanged with neighbours. Original knowledge as well as user feedback is distributed over the network based on similar trust and provenance mechanisms. The extended query language we call for also allows for personalization.

References

  1. K. Alexander, R. Cyganiak, M. Hausenblas, and J. Zhao. Describing Linked Datasets -- On the Design and Usage of voiD, the Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets. In LDOW, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Bizer, J. Lehmann, G. Kobilarov, S. Auer, C. Becker, R. Cyganiak, and S. Hellmann. DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data. Web Semant., 7(3):154--165, Sept. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Cheng and Y. Qu. Searching Linked Objects with Falcons: Approach, Implementation and Evaluation. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 5(3):49--70, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Ding, T. Finin, A. Joshi, R. Pan, R. S. Cost, Y. Peng, P. Reddivari, V. Doshi, and J. Sachs. Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In CIKM, pages 652--659, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. El-Helw, M. H. Farid, and I. F. Ilyas. Just-in-time information extraction using extraction views. In SIGMOD, pages 613--616, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. J. Franklin, D. Kossmann, T. Kraska, S. Ramesh, and R. Xin. CrowdDB: answering queries with crowdsourcing. In SIGMOD, pages 61--72, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Goasdoué, K. Karanasos, J. Leblay, and I. Manolescu. View selection in semantic web databases. PVLDB, 5(2):97--108, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. O. Hartig. Zero-knowledge query planning for an iterator implementation of link traversal based query execution. In ESWC (1), pages 154--169, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Hogan, A. Harth, J. Umbrich, S. Kinsella, A. Polleres, and S. Decker. Searching and browsing linked data with SWSE: The semantic web search engine. J. Web Sem., 9(4):365--401, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Hose and R. Schenkel. Towards Benefit-Based RDF Source Selection for SPARQL Queries. In Semantic Web Information Management (SWIM), Scottsdale, AZ, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Jain, P. G. Ipeirotis, A. Doan, and L. Gravano. Join optimization of information extraction output: Quality matters! In ICDE, pages 186--197, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Ladwig and T. Tran. SIHJoin: Querying remote and local linked data. In ESWC (1), pages 139--153, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Langegger, W. Wöß, and M. Blöchl. A semantic web middleware for virtual data integration on the web. In ESWC, pages 493--507, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Lu and J. Callan. Content-Based Peer-to-Peer Network Overlay for Full-Text Federated Search. In D. Evans, S. Furui, and C. Soulé-Dupuy, editors, RIAO. CID, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Meiser, M. Dylla, and M. Theobald. Interactive reasoning in uncertain RDF knowledge bases. In CIKM, pages 2557--2560, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Metzger, S. Elbassuoni, K. Hose, and R. Schenkel. S3K: Seeking Statement-Supporting top-K Witnesses. In CIKM, Glasgow, UK, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Michel, P. Triantafillou, and G. Weikum. MINERVA∞: A Scalable Efficient Peer-to-Peer Search Engine. In USENIX 2005, volume 3790 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 60--81, Grenoble, France, 2005. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Motik, R. Shearer, and I. Horrocks. Hypertableau Reasoning for Description Logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 36:165--228, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Oren, R. Delbru, M. Catasta, R. Cyganiak, H. Stenzhorn, and G. Tummarello. Sindice.com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies, 3:37--52, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Quilitz and U. Leser. Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In ESWC, pages 524--538, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Schwarte, P. Haase, K. Hose, R. Schenkel, and M. Schmidt. FedX: Optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data. In ISWC, pages 601--616, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Selke, C. Lofi, and W.-T. Balke. Pushing the boundaries of crowd-enabled databases with query-driven schema expansion. PVLDB, 5(6):538--549, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. YAGO: A core of semantic knowledge - unifying WordNet and Wikipedia. In WWW, pages 697--706, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. F. M. Suchanek, S. Abiteboul, and P. Senellart. PARIS: Probabilistic Alignment of Relations, Instances, and Schema. PVLDB, 5(3):157--168, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Suciu, D. Olteanu, C. Ré, and C. Koch. Probabilistic Databases. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Umbrich, K. Hose, M. Karnstedt, A. Harth, and A. Polleres. Comparing data summaries for processing live queries over linked data. World Wide Web, 14(5-6):495--544, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Colledge: a vision of collaborative knowledge networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SSW '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Search over the Web
      August 2012
      36 pages
      ISBN:9781450323017
      DOI:10.1145/2494068

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SSW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate6of19submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6of19submissions,32%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader