skip to main content
10.1145/2506583.2506710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Multi-Resolution Rigidity-Based Sampling of Protein Conformational Paths

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a geometry-based, sampling based method to explore conformational pathways in medium and large proteins which undergo large-scale conformational transitions. In a past work we developed a coarse-grained geometry-based method that was able to trace large-scale conformational motions in proteins using residues between secondary structure elements as hinges, and a simple yet effective energy function. In this work we apply a rigidity-analysis tool to determine the rigid and flexible regions in protein structures, since hinges may not always lie on loops between secondary structure elements. This method allows for better accuracy in determining the rotational degrees of freedom of the proteins. We conducted a multi-resolution search scheme, as both C-α and backbone representations are used for sampling the protein conformational paths. Characteristic conformations detected by clustering the paths are converted to full atom protein structures and minimized to detect interesting intermediate conformations that may correspond to transition states or other events. Our algorithm was able to run efficiently on a proteins of various sizes and the results agree with experimentally determined intermediate protein structures.

References

  1. I. Al-Bluwi, M. Vaisset, T. Simeon, and J. Cortes. Coarse-grained elastic networks, normal mode analysis and robotics-inspired methods for modeling protein conformational transitions. In proc. of Comput Struct Bioinf. Workshop (CSBW), pages 40--47, Philadelphia, PA, October 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. S. Apaydin, D. L. Brutlag, C. Guestrin, D. Hsu, and J.-C. Latombe. Stochastic conformational roadmaps for computing ensemble properties of molecular motion. In J. D. Boissonnat, J. Burdick, K. Goldberg, and S. Hutchinson, editors, Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics V, pages 131--147. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. A. Case, T. Cheatham, T. Darden, H. Gohlke, R. Luo, K. M. Merz Jr., A. Onufriev, C. Simmerling, B. Wang, and R. Woods. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Computat. Chem., 26:1668--1688, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Cortés, T. Siméon, V. R. de Angulo, D. Guieysse, M. Remauld-Siméon, and V. Tran. A path planning approach for computing large-amplitude motions of flexible molecules. Bioinformatics, 21 Suppl. 1:i116--i125, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Dhanik, P. Yao, N. Marz, R. Propper, C. Kou, G. L. H. van den Bedem, and J.-C. Latombe. Efficient algorithms to explore conformation spaces of flexible protein loops. In 7th Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI), pages 265--276, Philadelphia, PA, September 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Duan, C. Wu, S. Chowdhury, M. Lee, G. Xiong, W. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Cieplak, R. Luo, and T. Lee. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem., 24:1999--2012, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Feng, L. Yang, A. Kloczkowski, and R. Jernigan. The energy profiles of atomic conformational transition intermediates of adenylate kinase. Proteins, 77(3):551--558, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. Fox, F. Jagodzinski, Y. Li, and I. Streinu. KINARI-Web: A server for protein rigidity analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 39 (Web Server Issue):W177--W183, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Gerstein, A. M. Lesk, and C. Chothia. Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry, 33:6739--6749, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Haspel, M. Moll, M. Baker, W. Chiu, and L. E. Kavraki. Tracing conformational changes in proteins. BMC Structural Biology, Suppl1:S1, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. P. Heath, L. E. Kavraki, and C. Clementi. From coarse-grain to all-atom: Toward multiscale analysis of protein landscapes. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, 68(3):646--661, August 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. J. Heyer, S. Kruglyak, and S. Yooseph. Exploring expression data: Identification and analysis of coexpressed genes. Genome Research, 9(11):1106--1115, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. 14(1):33--38, 1996. http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Jacobs and B. Hendrickson. An algorithms for two-dimensional rigidity percolation: the pebble game. Journal of Computational Physics, 137:346--365, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Jacobs and M. Thorpe. Generic rigidity percolation: the pebble game. Physics Review Letters, 75:4051--4054, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. F. Jagodzinski, J. Hardy, and I. Streinu. Using rigidity analysis to probe mutation-induced structural changes in proteins. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 10(3), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Jónsson, G. Mills, and K. W. Jacobsen. Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions. In B. J. Berne, G. Ciccoti, and D. F. Coker, editors, Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations, pages 385--404. World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. G. G. Krivov, M. V. Shapovalov, and R. L. Dunbrack. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with scwrl4. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 77(4):778--795, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Luo and N. Haspel. Efficient coarse-grained geometry-based sampling of protein conformational paths. In Proc. of the 5th international conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (BiCOB), Honolulu, HI, March 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Molloy and A. Shehu. A robotics-inspired method to sample conformational paths connecting known functionally-relevant structures in protein systems. In proc. of Comput Struct Bioinf. Workshop (CSBW), pages 56--63, Philadelphia, PA, October 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. N. Tracing conformational changes in proteins represented at a coarse level. In Proc. of the 5th international conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information, and Computing Systems (BIONETICS), pages 343--356, Boston MA, USA, December 2010. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. A. Papoian, J. Ulander, M. P. Eastwood, Z. Luthey-Schulten, and P. G. Wolynes. Water in protein structure prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101(10):3352--3357, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. B. Raveh, A. Enosh, O. Furman-Schueler, and D. Halperin. Rapid sampling of molecular motions with prior information constraints. Plos Comp. Biol., 5(2):e1000295, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G. Schroeder, A. T. Brunger, and M. Levitt. Combining efficient conformational sampling with a deformable elastic network model facilitates structure refinement at low resolution. Structure, 15:1630--1641, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. A. Shehu, L. Kavraki, and C. Clementi. Multiscale characterization of protein conformational ensembles. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. E. Yap, N. Fawzi, and T. Head-Gordon. A coarse-grained alpha-carbon protein model with anisotropic hydrogen-bonding. Proteins: Structure, function and bioinformatics, 70:626--638, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Zheng and B. Brooks. Identification of dynamical correlations within the myosin motor domain by the normal mode analysis of an elastic network model. J. Mol. Biol., 346(3):745--759, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Multi-Resolution Rigidity-Based Sampling of Protein Conformational Paths

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BCB'13: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedical Informatics
      September 2013
      987 pages
      ISBN:9781450324342
      DOI:10.1145/2506583

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      BCB'13 Paper Acceptance Rate43of148submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader