skip to main content
10.1145/2522848.2533789acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expertise estimation based on simple multimodal features

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multimodal Learning Analytics is a field that studies how to process learning data from dissimilar sources in order to automatically find useful information to give feedback to the learning process. This work processes video, audio and pen strokes information included in the Math Data Corpus, a set of multimodal resources provided to the participants of the Second International Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics. The result of this processing is a set of simple features that could discriminate between experts and non-experts in groups of students solving mathematical problems. The main finding is that several of those simple features, namely the percentage of time that the students use the calculator, the speed at which the student writes or draws and the percentage of time that the student mentions numbers or mathematical terms, are good discriminators be- tween experts and non-experts students. Precision levels of 63% are obtained for individual problems and up to 80% when full sessions (aggregation of 16 problems) are analyzed. While the results are specific for the recorded settings, the methodology used to obtain and analyze the features could be used to create discriminations models for other contexts.

References

  1. P. Blikstein, "Multimodal learning analytics," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 102--106, ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Worsley, "Multimodal learning analytics: enabling the future of learning through multimodal data analysis and interfaces," in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction, pp. 353--356, ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Scherer, N. Weibel, L.-P. Morency, and S. Oviatt, "Multimodal prediction of expertise and leadership in learning groups," in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, MLA '12, p. 1:8, ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Yilmaz, O. Javed, and M. Shah, "Object tracking: A survey," Acm Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 38, no. 4, p. 13, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. J. Lipton, H. Fujiyoshi, and R. S. Patil, "Moving target classification and tracking from real-time video," in Applications of Computer Vision, 1998. WACV'98. Proceedings., Fourth IEEE Workshop on, pp. 8--14, IEEE, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Hammond and R. Davis, "Tahuti: A geometrical sketch recognition system for uml class diagrams," in ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, p. 25, ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Oviatt, A. Cohen, and N. Weibel, "Multimodal learning analytics: Description of math data corpus for icmi grand challenge workshop," Second International Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, December 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L. V. Gool, "SURF: speeded up robust features," in Computer Vision - ECCV 2006, no. 3951 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 404--417, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jan. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Bradski, "The OpenCV Library," Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Muja and D. G. Lowe, "Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration," in In VISAPP International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, pp. 331--340, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Kim, T. H. Chalidabhongse, D. Harwood, and L. Davis, "Real-time foreground-background segmentation using codebook model," Real-Time Imaging, vol. 11, pp. 172--185, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. R. Bradski and A. Kaehler, Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision in CGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. with the OpenCV Library. Oreilly & Associates Incorporated, Mar. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Z. Kalal, K. Mikolajczyk, and J. Matas, "Tracking-learning-detection," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1409--1422, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z. Kalal, J. Matas, and K. Mikolajczyk, "P-N Learning: Bootstrapping Binary Classifiers by Structural Constraints," Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Chelba, D. Bikel, M. Shugrina, P. Nguyen, and S. Kumar, "Large scale language modeling in automatic speech recognition," tech. rep., Google, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Schalkwyk, D. Beeferman, F. Beaufays, B. Byrne, C. Chelba, M. Cohen, M. Kamvar, and B. Strope, ""your word is my command": Google search by voice: A case study," in Advances in Speech Recognition, pp. 61--90, Springer, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. B. Lovins, Development of a Stemming Algorithm. M.I.T. Information Processing Group, Electronic Systems Laboratory, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B. Paulson and T. Hammond, "Paleosketch: accurate primitive sketch recognition and beautification," in Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, IUI '08, pp. 1--10, ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone, "Classification and regression trees. wadsworth & brooks," Monterey, CA, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Therneau, B. Atkinson, and B. Ripley, rpart: Recursive Partitioning, 2013. R package version 4.1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. Sanchez-Cortes, O. Aran, M. S. Mast, and D. Gatica-Perez, "A nonverbal behavior approach to identify emergent leaders in small groups," Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 816--832, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. J. Cole, J. Gwizdka, C. Liu, N. J. Belkin, and X. Zhang, "Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patterns," Information Processing & Management, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Worsley and P. Blikstein, "Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 94--101, ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. J. Kellman and P. Garrigan, "Perceptual learning and human expertise," Physics of life reviews, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 53--84, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. T. Chi, P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, "Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices," Cognitive science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 121--152, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. L. Jiang, J. Elen, and G. Clarebout, "The relationships between learner variables, tool-usage behaviour and performance," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 501--509, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Expertise estimation based on simple multimodal features

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '13: Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction
      December 2013
      630 pages
      ISBN:9781450321297
      DOI:10.1145/2522848

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 December 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICMI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate49of133submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader