skip to main content
research-article

Achieving full-view coverage in camera sensor networks

Published:06 December 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Camera sensors are different from traditional scalar sensors, as cameras at different positions can form very different views of the object. However, traditional coverage model does not consider this intrinsic property of camera sensors. To address this issue, a novel model called full-view coverage is proposed. It uses the angle between the object's facing direction and the camera's viewing direction to measure the quality of coverage. An object is full-view covered if there is always a camera to cover it no matter which direction it faces and the camera's viewing direction is sufficiently close to the object's facing direction. An efficient method is proposed for full-view coverage detection in any given camera sensor networks, and a sufficient condition on the sensor density needed for full-view coverage in a random uniform deployment is derived. In addition, the article shows a necessary and sufficient condition on the sensor density for full-view coverage in a triangular lattice-based deployment. Based on the full-view coverage model, the article further studies the barrier coverage problem. Existing weak and strong barrier coverage models are extended by considering direction issues in camera sensor networks. With these new models, weak/strong barrier coverage verification problems are introduced, and new detection methods are proposed and evaluated.

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Kanhere, S. S., and Jha, S. 2005. The holes problem in wireless sensor networks: A survey. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 9, 2, 4--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., and Chowdhury, K. R. 2007. A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Comput. Netw. 51, 4, 921--960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alexandroff, P. S. 1998. Combinatorial Topology. Dover, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alon, N. and Spencer, J. H. 2000. The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bejerano, Y. 2008. Simple and efficient k-coverage verification without location information. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. 291--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Blanz, V., Grother, P., Phillips, P. J., and Vetter, T. 2005. Face recognition based on frontal views generated from non-frontal images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05). 454--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cai, Y., Lou, W., Li, M., and Li, X.-Y. 2009. Energy efficient target-oriented scheduling in directional sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 58, 9, 1259--1274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cardei, M. and Wu, J. 2006. Energy-efficient coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 29, 4, 413--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chen, A., Lai, T. H., and Xuan, D. 2008. Measuring and guaranteeing quality of barrier-coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'08). 2:1--2:31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Clouqueur, T., Phipatanasuphorn, V., Ramanathan, P., and Saluja, K. K. 2003. Sensor deployment strategy for detection of targets traversing a region. Mob. Netw. Appl. 8, 453--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., and Stein, C. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms 2nd Ed. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cărbunar, B., Grama, A., Vitek, J., and Cărbunar, O. 2006. Redundancy and coverage detection in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2, 1, 94--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gage, D. 1992. Command control for many-robot systems. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual AUVS Technical Symposium (AUVS-92). 22--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hörster, E. and Lienhart, R. 2006. On the optimal placement of multiple visual sensors. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Huang, C.-F. and Tseng, Y.-C. 2003. The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. 115--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Johnson, M. P. and Bar-Noy, A. 2011. Pan and scan: Configuring cameras for coverage. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasbekar, G. S., Bejerano, Y., and Sarkar, S. 2009. Lifetime and coverage guarantees through distributed coordinate-free sensor activation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'09). 169--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kershner, R. 1939. The number of circles covering a set. Am. J. Math. 61, 3, 665--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Arora, A. 2005. Barrier coverage with wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'05). 284--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Li, X.-Y., Wan, P.-J., and Frieder, O. 2003. Coverage in wireless ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 52, 753--763. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Liu, B., Dousse, O., Wang, J., and Saipulla, A. 2008. Strong barrier coverage of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'08). 411--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liu, C. and Cao, G. 2011. Spatial-temporal coverage optimization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 10, 4, 465--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. 2001. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. 1380--1387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips, P. J., Scruggs, W. T., O'Toole, A. J., Flynn, P. J., Bowyer, K. W., Schott, C. L., and Sharpe, M. 2007. FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results. Tech. rep. NISTIR 7408, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rinner, B. and Wolf, W. 2008. A bright future for distributed smart cameras. Proc. IEEE 96, 10, 1562--1564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Saipulla, A., Liu, B., Xing, G., Fu, X., and Wang, J. 2010. Barrier coverage with sensors of limited mobility. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'10). 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sanderson, C., Shang, T., and Lovell, B. C. 2007. Towards pose-invariant 2D face classification for surveillance. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures (AMFG'07). 276--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Solomon, H. 1978. Geometric Probability. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Soro, S. and Heinzelman, W. 2009. A survey of visual sensor networks. In Adv. Multimedia, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Veltri, G., Huang, Q., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2003. Minimal and maximal exposure path algorithms for wireless embedded sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SenSys'03. 40--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, G., Cao, G., and La Porta, T. F. 2006. Movement-assisted sensor deployment. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 5, 6, 640--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wang, X., Xing, G., Zhang, Y., Lu, C., and Gill, C. 2003. Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SenSys'03. 28--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wang, Y. and Cao, G. 2011a. Barrier coverage in camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'11). Paris, France, 1781--1789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wang, Y. and Cao, G. 2011b. Minimizing service delay in directional sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. 1790--1798.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, Y. and Cao, G. 2011c. On full-view coverage in camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. 1781--1789.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang, G. and Qiao, D. 2009. Barrier information coverage with wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. 918--926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Achieving full-view coverage in camera sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 10, Issue 1
      November 2013
      559 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2555947
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 December 2013
      • Accepted: 1 January 2013
      • Revised: 1 November 2012
      • Received: 1 May 2012
      Published in tosn Volume 10, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader