skip to main content
10.1145/2556195.2556263acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effective co-betweenness centrality computation

Published:24 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Betweenness centrality of vertices is essential in the analysis of social and information networks, and co-betweenness centrality is one of two natural ways to extend it to sets of vertices. Existing algorithms for co-betweenness centrality computation suffer from at least one of the following problems: i) their applicability is limited to special cases like sequences, sets of size two, and ii) they are not efficient in terms of time complexity. In this paper, we present efficient algorithms for co-betweenness centrality computation of any set or sequence of vertices in weighted and unweighted networks. We also develop effective methods for co-betweenness centrality computation of sets and sequences of edges. These results provide a clear and extensive view about the complexity of co-betweenness centrality computation for vertices and edges in weighted and un-weighted networks. Finally, we perform extensive experiments on real-world networks from different domains including social, information and communication networks, to show the empirical efficiency of the proposed methods.

References

  1. A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509--512, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Ballester, A. C. Armengol and Y. Zenou, Who's who in networks. wanted: The key player, Econometrica, 74(5), 1403--1417, Sep. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Barthelemy, Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. The Europ. Phys. J. B - Condensed Matter 38, 2(Mar.), 163--168, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. P. Borgatti, Types of network flows and how to destabilize terrorist networks, Sunbelt International Social Networks Conference, New Orleans, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. P. Borgatti, Centrality and network flow, Social Networks, 27(1), 55--71, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. P. Borgatti, Identifying sets of key players in a social network, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 12(1), 21--34, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. U. Brandes, A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163--177, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. U. Brandes, On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation, Social Networks, 30(2), 136--145, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Brin, R. Motwani, L. Page and T. Winograd, What can you do with a web in your pocket? IEEE Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 21(2), 37--47, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Cuzzocrea, A. Papadimitriou, D. Katsaros and Y. Manolopoulos, Edgebetweenness centrality: A novel algorithm for QoS-based topology control over wireless sensor networks, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(4), 1210--1217, July 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Dolev, Y. Elovici and R. Puzis, Routing betweenness centrality, J. ACM, 57(4), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Everett and S. Borgatti. The centrality of groups and classes, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181--201, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. C. Freeman, A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness, Sociometry, 40, 35--41, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. C. Freeman, Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215--239, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. L. C. Freeman, S. P. Borgatti, and D. R. White, Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow, Social Networks, 13(2), 141--154, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman, Community structure in social and biological networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7821--7826, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Holme, Congestion and centrality in traffic flow on complex networks, Adv. Complex Syst, 6(2), 163--176, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. M. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 46(5), 604--632, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Knuth, Section 5.2.4: Sorting by Merging, Sorting and Searching. The Art of Computer Programming 3 (2nd ed.), Addison-Wesley, 158--168, 998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. D. Kolaczyk, D. B. Chua and M. Barthelemy. Group-betweenness and co-betweenness: Inter-related notions of coalition centrality, Social Networks, 31(3), 190--203, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Lammer, B. Gehlsen, D. Helbing. Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks. Physica A, 363(1), 89--95, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg and C. Faloutsos, Graphs over Time: Densification Laws, Shrinking Diameters and Possible Explanations, KDD, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg and C. Faloutsos, Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (ACM TKDD), 1(1), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Ley, The DBLP computer science bibliography: Evolution, research issues, perspectives, In Proc. Int. Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, 1--10, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. X. Li, J. Han, J.-G. Lee and H. Gonzalez, Traffic density-based discovery of hot routes in road networks, 10th Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD), 441--459, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Lusseau, K. Schneider, O. J. Boisseau, P. Haase, E. Slooten, and S. M. Dawson, The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 396--405, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. P.Massa, M. Salvetti and D. Tomasoni, Bowling alone and trust decline in social network sites, In Proc. Int. Conf. Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 658--663, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. McAuley and J. Leskovec, Learning to discover social circles in ego networks, NIPS, pages 548--556. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. E. J. Newman, A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks, Social Networks, 27(1), 39--54, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. K. Norlen, G. Lucas, M. Gebbie and J. Chuang, EVA: Extraction, Visualization and Analysis of the Telecommunications and Media Ownership Network. Proceedings of International Telecommunications Society 14th Biennial Conference (ITS2002), Seoul Korea, August 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Perer, B. Shneiderman, Balancing systematic and flexible exploration of social networks, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5), 693--700, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Puzis, Y. Elovici and S. Dolev. Fast algorithm for successive computation of group betweenness centrality, Phys. Rev. E, 76(5), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. R. Puzis, Y. Elovici and S. Dolev, Finding the most prominent group in complex networks, AI Commun. 20(4), 287--296, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. J. M. Reitz, ODLIS: Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. G. Yan, T. Zhou, B. Hu, Z. Q. Fu, and B.-H. Wang, Efficient routing on complex networks. Phys. Rev. E, 73, 046108, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effective co-betweenness centrality computation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '14: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
      February 2014
      712 pages
      ISBN:9781450323512
      DOI:10.1145/2556195

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WSDM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate64of355submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate498of2,863submissions,17%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader