ABSTRACT
Scientists debate whether people grow closer to their friends through social networking sites like Facebook, whether those sites displace more meaningful interaction, or whether they simply reflect existing ties. Combining server log analysis and longitudinal surveys of 3,649 Facebook users reporting on relationships with 26,134 friends, we find that communication on the site is associated with changes in reported relationship closeness, over and above effects attributable to their face-to-face, phone, and email contact. Tie strength increases with both one-on-one communication, such as posts, comments, and messages, and through reading friends' broadcasted content, such as status updates and photos. The effect is greater for composed pieces, such as comments, posts, and messages than for 'one-click' actions such as 'likes.' Facebook has a greater impact on non-family relationships and ties who do not frequently communicate via other channels.
- Allan, G.A. A sociology of friendship and kinship. G. Allen & Unwin, 1979.Google Scholar
- Berger, C.R. Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. Language and social psychology, (1979), 122-144.Google Scholar
- Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., and Sailer, L. The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13, (1984), 495--517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berscheid, E. and Reis, H.T. Attraction and close relationships. The handbook of social psychology 2, (1998), 193--281.Google Scholar
- Burke, M. Reading, Writing, Relationships: The Impact of Social Network Sites on Relations and Well-Being. Carnegie Mellon University Doctoral Dissertation. (2011). http://reportsarchive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/hcii/Carnegie Mellon University-HCII-11--107.pdf.Google Scholar
- Burke, M., Kraut, R.E., and Marlow, C. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proceedings of the 29th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '11), (2011), 571--580. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burt, R. Decay functions. Social Networks 22, (2000), 1--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Collins, N.L. and Miller, L.C. Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 116, 3 (1994), 457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donath, J. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2008), 231--251.Google Scholar
- Duck, S. Relating to others. Dorsey Press, 1988.Google Scholar
- Duck, S., Rutt, D.J., Hurst, M.H., and Strejc, H. Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships. Human Communication Research 18, 2 (1991), 228--267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Grey, R., and Lampe, C. Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and their Role in Social Capital Processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (2014).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fischer, C.S. To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'09), (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hampton, K., Goulet, L.S., Rainie, L., and Purcell, K. Social networking sites and our lives. 2011.Google Scholar
- Hampton, K.N., Lee, C.J., and Her, E.J. How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society 13, 7 (2011), 1031--1049.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haythornthwaite, C. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society 18, 5 (2002), 385--401.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hill, R.A. and Dunbar, R.I.M. Social network size in humans. Human Nature 14, 1 (2003), 53--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Junco, R. Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 626--631. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keele, L. and Kelly, N.J. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis 14, 2 (2006), 186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Knapp, M.L. and Vangelisti, A.L. Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Allyn and Bacon Boston, 1992.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being' American Psychologist 53, 9 (1998), 1017--1031.Google Scholar
- Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., and Ng, Z.W. Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, 6 (2005), 925.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ledbetter, A.M., Mazer, J.P., DeGroot, J.M., Meyer, K.R., Yuping Mao, and Swafford, B. Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness. Communication Research 38, 1 (2011), 27--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Litwak, E. and Szelenyi, I. Primary group structures and their functions: Kin, neighbors, and friends. American Sociological Review, (1969).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marin, A. and Hampton, K.N. Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator. Field Methods 19, 2 (2007), 163--193.Google Scholar
- Naaman, M., Boase, J., and Lai, C.H. Is it really about me': message content in social awareness streams. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (2010), 189--192. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pollet, T.V., Roberts, S.G.B., and Dunbar, R.I.M. Use of Social Network Sites and Instant Messaging Does Not Lead to Increased Offline Social Network Size, or to Emotionally Closer Relationships with Offline Network Members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14, 4 (2011), 253--258.Google Scholar
- Roberts, S. and Dunbar, R.I.M. Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Personal Relationships, (2010).Google Scholar
- Spence, M. Job market signaling. The quarterly journal of Economics 87, 3 (1973), 355.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communications. Management science, (1986), 1492--1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Turkle, S. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Valkenburg, P.M. and Peter, J. Preadolescents and adolescents online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 43, 2 (2007), 267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van Grove, J. Twitter analysis: 40% of tweets are pointless babble. Mashable, 2009. http://mashable.com/2009/08/12/twitter-analysis/.Google Scholar
- Vitak, J. Keeping connected in the Facebook age: The relationship between Facebook use, relationship maintenance strategies, and relational outcomes. (2012).Google Scholar
- Vitak, J. Facebook Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Relationship Maintenance Strategies Among Geographically Dispersed and Communication-Restricted Connections. (2014).Google Scholar
- Zahavi, A. Mate selection--a selection for a handicap. Journal of theoretical Biology 53, 1 (1975), 205--214.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use
Recommendations
Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties
CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative workAmong those who have recently lost a job, social networks in general and online ones in particular may be useful to cope with stress and find new employment. This study focuses on the psychological and practical consequences of Facebook use following ...
Predicting Tie Strength with the Facebook API
PCI '14: Proceedings of the 18th Panhellenic Conference on InformaticsThis paper presents a user study that employed a Facebook application to calculate the strength of Facebook users' friendships. Specifically, 18 variables were collected via the Facebook API for 1728 friendships and used to predict tie strength reported ...
Identifying social capital in the facebook interface
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA number of studies have identified a robust relationship between the use of social network sites, particularly Facebook, and positive outcomes such as social capital. Social network site use is often measured as a function of use frequency, network ...
Comments