skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557192acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Photographing information needs: the role of photos in experience sampling method-style research

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Experience Sampling Method (ESM) enables researchers to capture information about participants' experiences in the moment. Adding an end-of-day retrospective survey also allows participants to elaborate on those experiences. Although the use of photos in retrospective interviews and surveys for memory elicitation is well known, little research has investigated the use of photos in ESM studies. As smartphone adoption increases facilitating ESM studies and making photo sharing easier, researchers need to continuously evaluate the method and investigate the role of photos in such studies. We conducted a large-scale ESM and retrospective survey study via Android smartphones with more than 1,000 US participants, and analyzed participants' photo submissions, including how photo use correlated with participants' data quality and what, if any, value photos added for researchers. Our study sheds light on the role of photos in ESM and retrospective studies that researchers can reference when constructing future study designs.

References

  1. Blumenstock, J.E. Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia. Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web WWW '08, ACM Press (2008), 1095--1096. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carter, S. and Mankoff, J. When participants do the capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Collier, J. Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. American Anthropologist 59, 5 (1957), 843--859.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Consolvo, S. and Walker, M. Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 2 (2003), 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., and Prescott, S. The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 6, 3 (1977), 281--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fanning, S. Visual Methodologies: PhotoElicitation in the University Classroom. The Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer, J.E. and Benford, S. Inferring player engagement in a pervasive experience. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 09, ACM Press (2009), 1903--1906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gabridge, T., Gaskell, M., and Stout, A. Information seeking through students' eyes : The MIT photo diary study. College & Research Libraries 69, 6 (2006), 510--523.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Grady, J. Working with visual evidence: an invitation and some practical advice. In Picturing the social landscape: visual methods and the sociological imagination. Routledge, London, 2004, 18--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hargittai, E. and Walejko, G. The Participation Divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society 11, 2 (2008), 239--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hargittai, E. Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people's web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 14 (2002), 1239--1244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Harper, D. Meaning and work: A study in photo elicitation. Current Sociology 34, 3 (1986), 24--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Husserl, E. Logical Investigations, volume 1. Routledge, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Intille, S., Kukla, C., and Ma, X. Eliciting user preferences using image-based experience sampling and reflection. CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI '02, ACM Press (2002), 738--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jakobsen, M.R. and Hornbæk, K. Fisheyes in the field: Using Method Triangulation to Study the Adoption and Use of Souce Code Visulization. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 09, ACM Press (2009), 1579--1588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. James, W. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. Henry, New York, 1890.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansen, B.J. and Spink, A. How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management 42, 1 (2006), 248--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, (1977), 159--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, M.L. and Dey, A.K. Using lifelogging to support recollection for people with episodic memory impairment and their caregivers. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Systems and Networking Support for Health Care and Assisted Living Environments, (2008), 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Litt, E. Measuring users' internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society 15, 4 (2013), 612--630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Madden, M. Online photo services. 2005. http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2005/Dec ember/Online-Photo-Services.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Meschtscherjakov, A., Reitberger, W., and Tscheligi, M. MAESTRO: Orchestrating User Behavior Driven and Context Triggered Experience Sampling. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, ACM Press (2010), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Miller, A.D. and Edwards, W.K. Give and take: A study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice. CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Noland, C.M. Auto-Photography as Research Practice : Identity and Self-Esteem Research. Jounal of Research Practice 2, 1 (2006), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. SNS and Facebook survey 2010. Washington D.C., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rainie, L., Brenner, J., and Purcell, K. Photos and videos as social currency online. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell, D.M. and Oren, M. Retrospective Cued Recall : A method for accurately recalling previous user behaviors. (2009), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Scollon, C.N. and Kim-Prieto, C. Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 5--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., and Hufford, M.R. Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4, 1 (2008), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sohn, T., Li, K.A., Griswold, W.G., and Hollan, J.D. A diary study of mobile information needs. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '08, ACM Press (2008), 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Michalina Maj, M.V. der L., and D'Argembeau, A. Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychologica, (2011), 370--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Stefanone, M.A. and Lackaff, D. Reality television as a model for online behavior: Blogging, photo, and video sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 4 (2009), 964--987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Tagg, J. The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. The University of Massachusetts Press, Boston, MA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Thelwall, M. Privacy and gender in the social web. In S. Trepte and L. Reinecke, eds., Privacy Online. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, 251--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Photographing information needs: the role of photos in experience sampling method-style research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader