skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557251acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for movement: evaluating computational models using LMA effort qualities

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

While single-accelerometers are a common consumer embedded sensors, their use in representing movement data as an intelligent resource remains scarce. Accelerometers have been used in movement recognition systems, but rarely to assess expressive qualities of movement. We present a prototype of wearable system for the real-time detection and classification of movement quality using acceleration data. The system applies Laban Movement Analysis (LMA) to recognize Laban Effort qualities from acceleration input using a Machine Learning software that generates classifications in real time. Existing LMA-recognition systems rely on motion capture data and video data, and can only be deployed in controlled settings. Our single-accelerometer system is portable and can be used under a wide range of environmental conditions. We evaluate the performance of the system, present two applications using the system in the digital arts and discuss future directions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p991-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

264.7 MB

References

  1. Amstutz, R., Amft, O., French, B., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D., and Troster, G. Performance Analysis of an HMM-Based Gesture Recognition Using a Wristwatch Device. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. (CSE), IEEE (2009), 303--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barakova, E.I. and Lourens, T. Expressing and interpreting emotional movements in social games with robots. Proceedings of the Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 14, 5 (2010), 457--467. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bartenieff, I. and Lewis, D. Body Movement: Coping with the Environment. Routledge, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergson, H. Matter and Memory. Zone Books, New York, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bindiganavale, R.N. Building parameterized action representations from observation. Doctoral dissertation University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bott, J.N., Crowley, J.G., and LaViola,Jr., J.J. Exploring 3D gestural interfaces for music creation in video games. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, ACM (2009), 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bouchard, D. and Badler, N. Semantic segmentation of motion capture using Laban Movement Analysis. Proceedings of the international conference o Intelligent Virtual Agents, Springer (2007), 37--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chi, D., Costa, M., Zhao, L., and Badler, N. The EMOTE model for Effort-Shape. Proceedings of the conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM (2000), 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., and Stienstra, M. Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8 (2007), 657676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Farella, E., O'Modhrain, S., Benini, L., and Riccó, B. Gesture Signature for Ambient Intelligence Applications: A Feasibility Study. In K.P. Fishkin, B. Schiele, P. Nixon and A. Quigley, eds., Pervasive Computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, 288--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fdili Alaoui, S., Caramiaux, B., Serrano, M. and Bevilacqua, F., Dance Movement Quality as Interaction Modality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), ACM (2012) 761--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hashim, W.N.W., Noor, N.L.M., and Adnan, W.A.W. The design of aesthetic interaction: towards a graceful interaction framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, ACM (2009), 69--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jones, E., Alexander, J., Andreou, A., Irani, P., and Subramanian, S. GesText: accelerometer-based gestural text-entry systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (2010), 2173--2182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Khoshhal, K., Aliakbarpour, H., Quintas, J., Drews, P., and Dias, J. Probabilistic LMA-based classification of human behaviour understanding using Power Spectrum technique. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), IEEE (2010), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Laban, R. and Lawrence, F.C. Effort: Economy of Human Movement. Macdonald and Evans, Plymouth, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Laban, R. Effort. Macdonald & Evans, London, 1947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Loke, L., Larssen, A.T., Robertson, T., and Edwards, J. Understanding movement for interaction design: frameworks and approaches. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, (2007), 691--701. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mentis, H., and Johansson, C. Seeing movement qualities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (2013), 3375--3384. n Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Moore, C.L. and Yamamoto, K. Beyond Words: Movement Observation and Analysis. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, U.S.A, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakata, T., Mori, T., and Sato, T. Analysis of impression of robot bodily expression. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 14, 1 (2002), 27--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pietrowicz, M., Garnett, G., McGrath, R., and Toenjes, J. Multimodal gestural interaction in performance. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rett, J., Dias, J., and Ahuactzin, J.-M. Bayesian reasoning for Laban Movement Analysis used in humanmachine interaction. International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems 2, 1 (2010), 13--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Roudaut, A., Baglioni, M., and Lecolinet, E. TimeTilt: Using Sensor-Based Gestures to Travel through Multiple Applications on a Mobile Device. Proceedings of INTERACT International Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, Springer-Verlag (2009), 830--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Santos, L., Prado, J.A., and Dias, J. Human Robot interaction studies on Laban human movement analysis and dynamic background segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent robots and systems (2009), 4984--4989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Schiphorst, T., Nack, F., KauwATjoe, M., et al. PillowTalk: can we afford intimacy? Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, ACM (2007), 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Schiphorst, T. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (2011), 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Scoditti, A., Blanch, R., and Coutaz, J. A novel taxonomy for gestural interaction techniques based on accelerometers. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, ACM (2011), 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sheets-Johnstone, M. The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Swaminathan, D., Thornburg, H., Mumford, J., Rajko, S., James, J., Ingalls, T., Campana, E., Qian, G., Sampath, P., Peng, B., A dynamic Bayesian approach to computational Laban shape quality analysis. Advances in Human Computer Interaction, (2009), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Widmer, G., Kubat, M., Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts, Machine Learning, 23, 1 (1996), 69--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wilson, A. and Shafer, S. XWand: UI for intelligent spaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), ACM (2003), 545--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhao, L. and Badler, N. Acquiring and validating motion qualities from live limb gestures. Graphical Models 67, 1 (2005), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing for movement: evaluating computational models using LMA effort qualities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader