ABSTRACT
Driven by outstanding success stories of Internet startups such as Facebook and The Huffington Post, recent studies have thoroughly described their growth. These highly visible online success stories, however, overshadow an untold number of similar ventures that fail. The study of website popularity is ultimately incomplete without general mechanisms that can describe both successes and failures. In this work we present six years of the daily number of users (DAU) of twenty-two membership-based websites - encompassing online social networks, grassroots movements, online forums, and membership-only Internet stores - well balanced between successes and failures. We then propose a combination of reaction-diffusion-decay processes whose resulting equations seem not only to describe well the observed DAU time series but also provide means to roughly predict their evolution. This model allows an approximate automatic DAU-based classification of websites into self-sustainable v.s. unsustainable and whether the startup growth is mostly driven by marketing & media campaigns or word-of-mouth adoptions.
- Alexa.com. http://www.alexa.com/help/traffic-learn-more.Google Scholar
- W. B. Arthur. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. U. Michigan Press, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lars Backstrom, Eytan Bakshy, Jon M Kleinberg, Thomas M Lento, and Itamar Rosenn. Center of attention: How facebook users allocate attention across friends. ICWSM, 2011.Google Scholar
- Lars Backstrom, Dan Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Xiangyang Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In SIGKDD, pages 44--54, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh Bala and Sanjeev Goyal. A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation. Econometrica, 68(5):1181--1229, September 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank Bass. Comments on "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables The Bass Model". Management science, 50(12 supplement):1833--1840, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danah Boyd. White flight in networked publics? how race and class shaped american teen engagement with myspace and facebook. In Lisa Nakamura, Peter Chow-White, and Alondra Nelson, editors, Race After the Internet, pages 203--222. Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
- Tadeusz Cali'nski and Jerzy Harabasz. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3(1):1--27, 1974.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Cauwels and Didier Sornette. Quis pendit ipsa pretia: Facebook valuation and diagnostic of a bubble based on nonlinear demographic dynamics. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 38(2):56--66, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Damon Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996):1194--1197, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4):370--379, July 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vittoria Colizza, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, and Alessandro Vespignani. Reaction--diffusion processes and metapopulation models in heterogeneous networks. Nature Physics, 3(4):276--282, March 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vittoria Colizza and Alessandro Vespignani. Epidemic modeling in metapopulation systems with heterogeneous coupling pattern: Theory and simulations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 251(3):450--467, April 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R Crane and D Sornette. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(41):15649--15653, October 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crunchbase. http://www.crunchbase.com.Google Scholar
- Z. Dezsö, E. Almaas, A. Lukács, B. Rácz, I. Szakadát, and A. L. Barabasi. Dynamics of information access on the web. Physical Review E, 73(6):066132, June 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph Farrell and Paul Klemperer. Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of industrial organization, 3:1967--2072, 2007.Google Scholar
- John C. Fisher and Robert H. Pry. A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological forecasting and social change, 3:75--88, 1972.Google Scholar
- Daniel Friedman. Evolutionary Games in Economics. Econometrica, 59(3):637--666, January 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Garcia, Pavlin Mavrodiev, and Frank Schweitzer. Social Resilience in Online Communities: The Autopsy of Friendster. In Proc.\ of COSN, pages 39--50, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Geroski. Models of technology diffusion. Research policy, 29(4):603--625, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oana Goga, Daniele Perito, Howard Lei, Renata Teixeira, and Robin Sommer. Large-scale Correlation of Accounts Across Social Networks. Technical report, 2013.Google Scholar
- Mark Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology, pages 1420--1443, 1978.Google Scholar
- Richard H. Smith Historian and Political Consultant Richard H. Smith. Why does Google News ignore The Huffington Post-http://goo.gl/rom0mg.Google Scholar
- Facebook Inc. Facebook second quarter 2013 results: http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=780093.Google Scholar
- Matthew O. Jackson. A survey of network formation models: stability and efficiency. Group formation in economics: networks, clubs and coalitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 11--57, 2005.Google Scholar
- Anick Jesdanun. MySpace popularity with teens fizzles, MSNBC News, Nov. 2007.Google Scholar
- Emily Jin, Michelle Girvan, and M Newman. Structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E, 64(4):046132, September 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanjay Ram Kairam, Dan J Wang, and Jure Leskovec. The life and death of online groups: Predicting group growth and longevity. In WSDM, pages 673--682, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. L. Kaplan and Paul Meier. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282):457--481, June 1958.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Katz and Carl Shapiro. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American economic review, 75(3):424--440, 1985.Google Scholar
- Ravi Kumar, Jasmine Novak, and Andrew Tomkins. Structure and Evolution of Online Social Networks. In link.springer.com, pages 337--357. Springer New York, New York, NY, August 2010.Google Scholar
- David Lazer, Alex Sandy Pentland, Lada Adamic, Sinan Aral, Albert Laszlo Barabasi, Devon Brewer, Nicholas Christakis, Noshir Contractor, James Fowler, Myron Gutmann, Tony Jebara, Gary King, Michael Macy, Deb Roy, and Marshall Van Alstyne. Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science, 323(5915):721, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jure Leskovec, Lars Backstrom, Ravi Kumar, and Andrew Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In SIGKDD, pages 462--470, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. TKDD, 1(1):2, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth Levenberg. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly Journal of Applied Mathmatics, II(2):164--168, 1944.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stan J Liebowitz and Stephen E Margolis. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2):133--150, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwin Mansfield. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 741--766, 1961.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwin Mansfield. Intrafirm Rates of Diffusion of an Innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 45(4):348--359, January 1963.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Marsili. The rise and fall of a networked society: A formal model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(6):1439--1442, January 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Montanari and A. Saberi. The spread of innovations in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(47):20196--20201, November 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Dickson Murray. Mathematical biology, volume 2. springer, 2002.Google Scholar
- Bruno Ribeiro. Modeling the relationship between social network activity, inactivity, and growth. arXiv:1307.1354v2.Google Scholar
- Bruno Ribeiro, William Gauvin, Benyuan Liu, and Don Towsley. On myspace account spans and double pareto-like distribution of friends. In INFOCOM NetSciCom, pages 1--6, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Rogers Everett. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, 5th edition, 2003.Google Scholar
- Thomas C. Schelling. Micromotives and macrobehavior. WW Norton & Company, 2006.Google Scholar
- US SEC. Sec filing for fundrasing of theblaze.com:http://goo.gl/umgyuA.Google Scholar
- Herbert A. Simon. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. In Martin Greenberger, editor, Computers, communications, and the public interest, pages 37--72. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
- Brian Skyrms and Robin Pemantle. A Dynamic Model of Social Network Formation. In scholar.google.com, pages 231--251. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, July 2009.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Slegg. jennifer-slegg Patch.com, Huffington Post dominate Google News results:http://goo.gl/SK3GH.Google Scholar
- Tom A B Snijders. Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1--2):149--172, April 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Strang and Sarah A Soule. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual review of sociology, pages 265--290, 1998.Google Scholar
- Gabor Szabo and Bernardo A Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53(8):80, August 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- TechCrunch Deadpool. http://techcrunch.com/tag/deadpool/.Google Scholar
- Mojtaba Torkjazi, Reza Rejaie, and Walter Willinger. Hot today, gone tomorrow. In WOSN, page 43, New York, New York, USA, 2009. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johan Ugander, Lars Backstrom, Cameron Marlow, and Jon Kleinberg. Structural diversity in social contagion. PNAS, 109(16):5962--5966, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. G. van Kampen. Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. North-Holland, 1, 1981.Google Scholar
- F. van Wijland, K. Oerding, and H. J. Hilhorst. Wilson renormalization of a reaction--diffusion process. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 251(1--2):179--201, March 1998.Google Scholar
- Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_social\_networking\_websites.Google Scholar
- F Wu and B A Huberman. Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(45):17599--17601, October 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Young. The dynamics of social innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(4):21285--21291, December 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaohan Zhao, Alessandra Sala, Christo Wilson, Xiao Wang, Sabrina Gaito, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y Zhao. Multi-scale dynamics in a massive online social network. In IMC, pages 171--184, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Modeling and predicting the growth and death of membership-based websites
Comments