Michael P. Salisbury
- 1.Debra Dooley and Michael Cohen. Automatic illustration of 3D geometric models: Lines. In Computer Graphics (1990 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics), pp. 77-82, March 1990. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Gershon Elber. Line art rendering via a coverage of isoparametric curves. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1(3):231-239, September 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Ralph Gibson. Tropism: photographs. Aperture, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Gupta and R. F. Sproull. Filtering edges for gray-scale displays. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '81 Proceedings), 15(3):1-5, August 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Arthur L. Guptill. Rendering in Pen and Ink. Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
- 6.Paul Haeberli. Paint by numbers: Abstract image representations. Computer Graphics, 24(4):207-214, August 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.John Lansdown and Simon Schofield. Expressive rendering: A review of nonphotorealistic techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(3):29-37, May 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Frank Lohan. Pen and Ink Techniques. Contemporary Books, Inc., Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar
- 9.Barbara J. Meier. Painterly rendering for animation. In Holly Rushmeier, editor, SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pp. 477-484. Addison Wesley, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Yachin Pnueli and Alfred M. Bruckstein. DigiDi~rer -- a digital engraving system. The Visual Computer, 10(5):277-292, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Takafumi Saito and Tokiichiro Takahashi. Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes. Computer Graphics, 24(4): 197-206, August 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Takafumi Saito and Tokiichiro Takahashi. NC machining with G- buffer method. Computer Graphics, 25(4):207-216, July 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Michael E Salisbury, Sean E. Anderson, Ronen Barzel, and David H. Salesin. Interactive pen-and-ink illustration. In Andrew Glassner, editor, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94, pp. 101-108. ACM Press, July 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Mike Salisbury, Corin Anderson, Dani Lischinski, and David H. Salesin. Scale-dependent reproduction of pen-and-ink illustrations. In Holly Rushmeier, editor, SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pp. 461-468. Addison Wesley, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Gary Simmons. The Technical Pen. Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
- 16.Thomas Strothotte, Bernhard Preim, Andreas Raab, Jutta Schumann, and David R. Forsey. How to render frames and influence people. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(3):455-466, 1994. Eurographics '94 Conference issue.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Georges Winkenbach and David H. Salesin. Computer-generated penand-ink illustration. In Andrew Glassner, editor, Proceedings of SIG- GRAPH '94, pp. 91-100. ACM Press, July 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Georges Winkenbach and David H. Salesin. Rendering free-form surfaces in pen and ink. In Holly Rushmeier, editor, SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pp. 469-476. Addison Wesley, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration
Recommendations
Computer-generated pen-and-ink illustration
SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesThis paper describes the principles of traditional pen-and-ink illustration, and shows how a great number of them can be implemented as part of an automated rendering system. It introduces “stroke textures,” which can be used for achieving both texture ...
Scale-dependent reproduction of pen-and-ink illustrations
SIGGRAPH '96: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesRendering parametric surfaces in pen and ink
SIGGRAPH '96: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Comments