skip to main content
10.1145/2598510.2598598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design

Published:21 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designers have demonstrated an increased interest in designing for reflection. However, that work currently occurs under a variety of diverse auspices. To help organize and investigate this literature, this paper present a review of research on systems designed to support reflection. Key findings include that most work in this area does not actually define the concept of reflection. We also find that most evaluations do not focus on reflection per se rather but on some other outcome arguably linked to reflection. Our review also describes the relationship between reflection and persuasion evidenced implicitly by both rhetorical motivations for and implementation details of system design. After discussing the significance of our findings, we conclude with a series of recommendations for improving research on and design for reflection.

References

  1. André, P., Schraefel, M.C., Dix, A., and White, R.W. (2011). Expressing well-being online: towards selfreflection and social awareness. Proc iConference, 114121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., and Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind-creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ToCHI, 84--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bannon, L. J. (1991). From Human Factors to Human Actors. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work, 25--44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Assoc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bannon, L. (2006). Forgetting as a feature, not a bug. CoDesign, 2(1), 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is "critical" about critical design? Proc CHI, 3297--3306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bateman, S., Teevan, J., and White, R.W. (2012). The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. Proc CHI, 1785--1794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bell, G. (2006). No More SMS From Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-Spiritual Practices. Proc Ubicomp, 141--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bjork, R. A. (1998). Intentional forgetting in perspective. In J. M. Golding & C. MacLeod (Eds.), Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches, 453--481. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N.G., Bødker, S., Korn, M., and Zander, P.-O. (2011). Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology. Proc C&T, 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bolter, J., and Gromala, D. (2006). Transparency and Reflectivity: Digital art and the aesthetics of interface Design. In: Fishwick, P. (ed.). Aesthetic Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proc NordiCHI, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Brade, M., Schneider, F., Salmen, A., and Groh, R. (2013). OntoSketch: Towards Digital Sketching as a Tool for Creating and Extending Ontologies for NonExperts. Proc i-Know, Article 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Branham, S.M, Harrison, S.H., and Hirsch, T. (2012). Expanding the design space for intimacy: supporting mutual reflection for local partners. Proc DIS, 220--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brown, A.R. (2010). Visualizing digital media interactions. Proc OZCHI, 196--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Bull, S., Mabbott, A., and Abu Issa, A.S. (2007). UMPTEEN: Named and Anonymous Learner Model Access for Instructors and Peers. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Ed., 17(3), 227--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carr, N. and Chambers, D.P. (2006). Cultural and organisational issues facing online learning communities of teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3--4), 269--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chen, Z.-H., Chou, C.-Y., Deng, Y.-C., and Chan, T.-K. (2007). Active Open Learner Models as Animal Companions. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Ed., 17(2), 145--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cheng, J, Bapat, A., Thomas, G., Tse, K., Nawathe, N., Crockett, J., and Leshed, G. (2011). GoSlow: designing for slowness, reflection and solitude. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 429--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dalsgaard, P, Halskov, K., and Harrison, S. (2012). Supporting reflection in and on design processes. Proc DIS, 803--804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdóttir, H. (2010). Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proc CHI, 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Fleck R. and Fitzpatrick G. (2009). Teachers' and tutors' social reflection around SenseCam images. Int. J. Hum.Comput. Stud., 67, 1024--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Fleck, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2010). Reflecting on Reflection: Framing a Design Landscape. Proc OZCHI, 216--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Frost, J. and Smith, B.K. (2003). Visualizing health: imagery in diabetes education. Proc DUX, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gao, F. (2012). Design for reflection on health behavior change. Proc IUI Doct. Cons., 379--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Gongora, L. (2011). Exploring the body and mind connection via improvisation in the design process. Proc DESIRE, 427--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Gongora, L. (2012). RePlay: a workshop exploring creativity in action. Proc TEI, 355--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Duval, E., and Pardo, A. (2012). The student activity meter for awareness and self-reflection. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 869--884. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Grimes, A., Landry, B.M., and Grinter, R.E. (2010). Characteristics of shared health reflections in a local community. Proc CSCW, 435--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Grudin, J. (1990). The Computer Reaches Out: the Historical Continuity of Interface Design. Proc CHI, 261--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hailpern, J., Hinterbichler, E., Leppert, C., Cook, D., and Bailey, B.P. (2007). TEAM STORM: demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work. Proc C&C, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hansen, N.B. and Dalsgaard, P. (2012). The productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events. Proc NordiCHI, 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2011). Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 385--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hebert, M.G. (2009). Vehicle #3: heliotropic furniture an autonomous installation. Proc C&C, 465--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hummels, C. and Frens, J. (2009). The reflective transformative design process. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 2655--2658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Intille, S., Kukla, C., and Ma, X. (2002). Eliciting user preferences using image-based experience sampling and reflection. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 738--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Intille, S.S., Rondoni, J., Kukla, C., Ancona, I., and Bao, L. (2003). A context-aware experience sampling tool. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 972--973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R. E. (2010). Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. Proc CHI, 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Isaacs, E., Konrad, A., Walendowski, A., Lennig, T, Hollis, V, and Whittaker, S. (2013). Echoes from the past: how technology mediated reflection improves well-being. Proc CHI, 1071--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Johnston, A., Amitani, S., and Edmonds, E. (2005). Amplifying reflective thinking in musical performance. Proc C&C, 166--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jones, J., Hall, S., Gentis, M., Reynolds, C., Gadwal, C., Hurst, A., Ronch, J., and Neylan, C. (2012). Visualizations for self-reflection on mouse pointer performance for older adults. Proc ASSETS, 287--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Joslyn, S. L., & Oakes, M. A. (2005). Directed forgetting of autobiographical events. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 577--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Kannabiran, G., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2011). How HCI Talks about Sexuality. Proc CHI, 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Kant, I. (1790). Critique of the Power of Judgment. (P. Guyer, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Kharrufa, A., Leat, D., and Olivier, P. (2010). Digital mysteries: designing for learning at the tabletop. Proc ITS, 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Kriplean, T., Morgan, J., Freelon, D., Borning, A., and Bennett, L. (2012). Supporting reflective public thought with ConsiderIt. Proc CSCW, 265--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Lamberty, K.K., Adams, S., Biatek, J., Froiland, K., and Lapham, J. (2011). Using a large display in the periphery to support children learning through design. Proc IDC, 62--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lamberty, K.K. and Kolodner, J.L. (2005). Camera talk: making the camera a partial participant. Proc CHI, 839848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Lee, M.L. and Dey, A.K. (2011). Reflecting on pills and phone use. Proc CHI, 2095--2104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Leijen, Í., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Simons, P.R-J., and Admiraal, W. (2009). Streaming video to enhance students' reflection in dance education. Comput. Educ., 52(1), 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Leong, T. W., & Brynskov, M. (2009). CO2nfession: Engaging with values through urban conversations. Proc OZCHI (pp. 209--216). Melbourne, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Li, I., Dey, A.K., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. Proc CHI, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Li, I., Dey, A.K., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. Proc UbiComp, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Li, I., Forlizzi, J., and Dey, A.K. (2010). Know thyself: monitoring and reflecting on facets of one's life. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 4489--4492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Li, I., Froehlich, J., Larsen, J.E., Grevet, C., and Ramirez, E. (2013). Personal informatics in the wild. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 3179--3182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Li, I., Medynskiy, Y., Froehlich, J., and Larsen, J.E. (2012). Personal informatics in practice. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 2799--2802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., and Sellen, A. (2009). Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape. Proc CHI, 1693--1702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Loke, L. and Robertson, T. (2009). Design representations of moving bodies for interactive, motion-sensing spaces. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 67(4), 394--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Malacria, S., Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., and Grossman, T. (2013). Skillometers: reflective widgets that motivate and help users to improve performance. Proc UIST, 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Mamykina, L., Miller, A.D., Mynatt, E.D., and Greenblatt, D. (2010). Constructing identities through storytelling in diabetes management. Proc CHI, 12031212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E.D., Davidson, P.R., and Greenblatt, D. (2008). MAHI: Investigation of Social Scaffolding for Reflective Thinking in Diabetes Management. Proc CHI, 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Mathur P. and Karahalios, K. (2009). Using bookmark visualizations for self-reflection and navigation. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 4657--4662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Mendels, P., Frens, J., and Overbeeke, K. (2011). Freed: a system for creating multiple views of a digital collection during the design process. Proc CHI, 14811490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in Learning & Professional Development. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Müller, L. 2013. Pervasive monitoring to support reflective learning. Proc UbiComp Adjunct, 349--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Takada, S., and Reeves, B.N. (2000). Two-dimensional spatial positioning as a means for reflection in design. Proc DIS, 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Nelson, E.J. and Freier, N.G. (2008). Push-me, pull-me: describing and designing technologies for varying degrees of reflection and invention. Proc IDC, 129--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. New York: Perseus Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Pirzadeh, A., He, L., and Stolterman, E. (2013). Personal informatics and reflection: a critical examination of the nature of reflection. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 1979--1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Prilla, M., Degeling, M., and Herrmann, T.. (2012). Collaborative reflection at work. Proc GROUP, 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Rojas, I. and Ju, W. (2009). Visualization and empowerment. Proc C&C, 401--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Sas, C., & Dix, A. (2009). Designing for reflection on experience. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 4741--4744. Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Santos, J.L, Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., and Duval, E. (2012). Goal-oriented visualizations of activity tracking. Proc LAK, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Santos, J.L., Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., and Duval, E. (2013). Addressing learner issues with StepUp!: an evaluation. Proc LAK, 14--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Sedig, K, Klawe, M., and Westrom, M.. (2001). Role of interface manipulation style and scaffolding on cognition and concept learning in learnware. ToCHI, 8(1), 34--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Seevinck, J., Candy, L., and Edmonds, E.A. (2006). Exploration and reflection in interactive art: glass pond. Proc OZCHI, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. "Jofish." (2005). Reflective Design. Proc Critical Computing, 49--58. Aarhus, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Mateas, M., & Gay, G. (2007). The disenchantment of affect. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(5), 347--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sharmin, M. and Bailey, B.P. (2011). "I reflect to improve my design": investigating the role and process of reflection in creative design. Proc C&C, 389--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Sharmin, M. and Bailey, B.P. (2013). ReflectionSpace: an interactive visualization tool for supporting reflection-on-action in design. Proc C&C, 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Shklovski, I., Vertesi, J., Troshynski, E., & Dourish, P. (2009). The Commodification of Location: Dynamics of Power in Location-Based Systems. Proc Ubicomp, 11--20). Orlando, FL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Smith, B.N., Xu, A., and Bailey, B.P. (2010). Improving interaction models for generating and managing alternative ideas during early design work. Proc GI, 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Sosik, V. S., Zhao, X., & Cosley, D. (2012). See Friendship, Sort of: How Conversation and Digital Traces Might Support Reflection on Friendships. Proc CSCW, 1145--1154. Bellevue, WA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Sumison, J. and Fleet, A. (1996). Reflection: Can we assess it? Should we assess it? Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 21, 121--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Taylor, A. S., & Swan, L. (2005). Artful systems in the home. Proc CHI, 641--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Tchetagni, J., Nkambou, R., and Bourdeau, J. (2007). Explicit Reflection in Prolog-Tutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Ed., (17)2, 169--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Thieme, A., Comber, R., Miebach, J., Weeden, J., Kraemer, N., Lawson, S., and Olivier, P. (2012). "We've bin watching you": designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles. Proc CHI, 2337--2346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Tomico, O., Frens, J.W., and Overbeeke, K.C.J. (2009). Co-reflection: user involvement for highly dynamic design processes. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 2695--2698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Tseng, T. and Bryant, C. (2013). Design, reflect, explore: encouraging children's reflections with mechanix. Proc CHI Ext. Abst., 619--624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Valkanova, N., Jorda, S., Tomitsch, M., and Moere, A.V. (2013). Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. Proc CHI, 3461--3470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. van Dijk, J., van der Roest, J., van der Lugt, R., and Overbeeke, K.C.J. 2011. NOOT: a tool for sharing moments of reflection during creative meetings. Proc C&C, 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Wallace, J., Wright, P.C., McCarthy, J., Green, D.P., Thomas, J., and Olivier, P. (2013). A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia. Proc CHI, 2617--2626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Webb, A.M., Linder, R., Kerne, A., Lupfer, N., Qu, Y., Poffenberger, B., and Revia, C. (2013). Promoting reflection and interpretation in education: curating rich bookmarks as information composition. Proc C&C, 5362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Webster, J. D. (1993). Construction and Validation of the Reminiscence Functions Scale. Journals of Gerontology, 48, 256--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Wiggins, G. (2006). A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems, 19(7), 449--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Wyche, S. P., Aoki, P. M., & Grinter, R. E. (2008). Re-placing faith: reconsidering the secular-religious use divide in the United States and Kenya. Proc CHI, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Yoo, D., Huldtgren, A., Woelfer, J.P., Hendry, D.G., and Friedman, B. (2013). A value sensitive actionreflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts. Proc CHI, 419--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Zhao, O.J., Ng, T., and Cosley, D. (2012). No forests without trees: particulars and patterns in visualizing personal communication. Proc iConference, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems
      June 2014
      1102 pages
      ISBN:9781450329026
      DOI:10.1145/2598510

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate107of402submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader