skip to main content
10.1145/2603088.2603117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Logics with counting and equivalence

Published:14 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the two-variable fragment of first-order logic with counting, subject to the stipulation that a single distinguished binary predicate be interpreted as an equivalence. We show that the satisfiability and finite satisfiability problems for this logic are both NExpTime-complete. We further show that the corresponding problems for two-variable first-order logic with counting and two equivalences are both undecidable.

References

  1. C. Chang and H. Keisler. Model Theory. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Eisenbrand and G. Shmonin. Carathéodory bounds for integer cones. Operations Research Letters, 34(5):564--568, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Grädel, P. Kolaitis, and M. Vardi. On the decision problem for two-variable first-order logic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 3(1):53--69, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. Grädel, M. Otto, and E. Rosen. Two-variable logic with counting is decidable. In Logic in Computer Science, pages 306--317. IEEE, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Janiczak. Undecidability of some simple formalized theories. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 40(1):131--139, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Kazakov. Saturation-based decision procedures for extensions of the guarded fragment. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Kazakov, U. Sattler, and E. Zolin. How many legs do I have? Non-simple roles in number restrictions revisited. In Proc. of LPAR, volume 4790 of LNCS, Berlin, 2007. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Kieroński. Results on the guarded fragment with equivalence or transitive relations. In Computer Science Logic, volume 3634 of LNCS, pages 309--324. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. Kieroński and M. Otto. Small substructures and decidability issues for first-order logic with two variables. In Logic in Computer Science, pages 448--457. IEEE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Kieroński and L. Tendera. On finite satisfiability of two-variable first-order logic with equivalence relations. In Logic in Computer Science. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Kieroński, J. Michalyszyn, I. Pratt-Hartmann, and L. Tendera. Two-variable first-order logic with equivalence closure. SIAM Journal on Computing, 43(3):1012--1063, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Mortimer. On languages with two variables. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 21:135--140, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Pacholski, W. Szwast, and L. Tendera. Complexity of two-variable logic with counting. In Logic in Computer Science, pages 318--327. IEEE, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Pratt-Hartmann. Complexity of the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 14(3):369--395, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Schrijver. Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. John Wiley & sons, New York, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Scott. A decision method for validity of sentences in two variables. Journal Symbolic Logic, 27:477, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W. Szwast and L. Tendera. FO2 with one transitive relation is decidable. In STACS, volume 20 of LIPIcs, pages 317--328. Schloß Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L. Tendera. Counting in the two-variable guarded fragment with transitivity. In Proc. of STACS, volume 3404 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 83--96, Berlin, 2005. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Logics with counting and equivalence

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSL-LICS '14: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)
        July 2014
        764 pages
        ISBN:9781450328869
        DOI:10.1145/2603088
        • Program Chairs:
        • Thomas Henzinger,
        • Dale Miller

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 July 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CSL-LICS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate74of212submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate143of386submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader