skip to main content
10.1145/262839.262988acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Space-time tradeoffs for emptiness queries (extended abstract)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1997Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.P. K. Agarwal. Range searching. Report CS-1996- 05, Dept. Comput. Sci., Duke Univ., 1996. http:// www.cs.duke.edu/-pankaj/papers/range-survey.ps.gz. To appear in The CRC Hur#dbook of D#cref.e arLd Comp#io,a# Geome#, J. E. Goodman and J. O'R#urke, editors, CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.P. K. Agarwal and J. Matou#k. Ray shooting and parametric search. SIAM J. Comp#t. 22(4):794-806, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.A. Aggarwal, M. Hansen, and T. Leighton. Solving query-retrieval problems by compacting Voronoi diagrams. Proc. F2nd Annu. A CM Sympos. Theory Comput, pp. 331-340, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.M. Ben-Or. Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees. Proc. 15th Annu. ACM Sympos. Theory Cornput., pp. 80-86, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.M. de Berg, M. Overmars, and O. Schwarzkopf. Computing and verifying depth orders. SIAM J. Comput 23:437-446, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.H. Br6nnimann, B. Chazelle, and J. Pach. How hard is halfspace range searching? Discrete Comput Geom. I0:143--155, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.T. M. Chan. Fixed-dimensional linear programming queries made easy. Proc. 12th Annu. ACM Sympos. Comput Geom., pp. 284-290, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.T. M. Chart. Output-sensitive results on convex hulls, extreme points, and related problems. Discrete Cornput Geom. 16:369--387, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.B. Chazelle. Lower bounds on the complexity of polytope range searching. J. Amer. Ma#h. Soc. 2:637--666, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.B. Chazelle. Cutting hyperplanes for divide-andconquer. Discref, e Corr#put,. Geom. 9(2):145-158, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.B. Chazelle, H. Edelsbrnnner, L. Guibas, and M. Sharir. Algorithms for bichromatic line segment problems and polyhedral terrains. Algori#hmica 11:116-132, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.B. Chazelle and J. Friedman. Point location among hyperplanes and unidirectional ray-shooting. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 4:53-62, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.B. Chazelle, L. J. Guibas, and D. T. Lee. The power of geometric duality. BIT 25:76-90, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.B. Chazelle and B. Rosenberg. Simplex range reporting on a pointer machine. Comput Geom. Theory Appl. 5:237-247, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.B. Chazelle. Lower bounds for off-line range searching. Discrete Comput Geom. 17(1):53-66, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.D. P. Dobkin and D. G. Kirkpatrick. Determining the separation of preprocessed polyhedra- a unified approach. Proc. 17th Inter'nat. Colloq. Automata Lang. Program., pp. 400-413. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 443, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.R. Dwyer and W. Eddy. Maximal empty ellipsoids. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl. 6:169--186, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.J. Erickson. New lower bounds for halfspace emptiness. Proc. 37#h Annu. IEEE Syrnpo$. Found. Cornput. Sci., pp. 472-481, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.J. Erickson. New lower bounds for Hopcroft's problem. Discrete Comput. Geom. 16:389-418, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.M. L. Fredman. Lower bounds on the complexity of some optimal data structures. SIAM J. Comput 10:1- 10, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.J. Matou#ek. Efficient partition trees. Discrete Cornput Geom. 8:315-334, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.J. Matotu#ek. Reporting points in halfspaces. Comput Geom. Theory Appl. 2(3):169--186, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.J. MatouJek. Linear optimization queries. J. Algor/t#ms 14:432--448, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.J. Matouiek. On vertical ray shooting in arrangements. Comput Geom. Theory Appl. 2(5):279-285, Mar. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.J. Matou#k. Range searching with efficient hierarchical cuttings. Discrete Comput Geom. 10(2):157-182, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.J. Matouiek. Geometric range searching. A CM Cornput Surv. 26:421-461, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.J. Mato# and O. Schwarzkopf. On ray shooting in convex polytopes. Discrete Comput Geom. 10(2):215- 232, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.J. Pach and P. K. Agarwal. Combinatorial Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos. Computa$ional Geome#ry: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.R. E. Tarjan. A class of algorithms which require nonlinear time to maintain disjoint sets. J. Comput Syst Sc/. 18:110-127, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.A. C. Yao. On the complexity of maintaining partial sums. SIAM J. Comput 14:277-288, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Space-time tradeoffs for emptiness queries (extended abstract)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SCG '97: Proceedings of the thirteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry
        August 1997
        490 pages
        ISBN:0897918789
        DOI:10.1145/262839

        Copyright © 1997 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 1997

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SCG '97 Paper Acceptance Rate75of199submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader