skip to main content
research-article

CEPR: A Collaborative Exploration and Periodically Returning Model for Location Prediction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 April 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With the growing popularity of location-based social networks, numerous location visiting records (e.g., check-ins) continue to accumulate over time. The more these records are collected, the better we can understand users’ mobility patterns and the more accurately we can predict their future locations. However, due to the personality trait of neophilia, people also show propensities of novelty seeking in human mobility, that is, exploring unvisited but tailored locations for them to visit. As such, the existing prediction algorithms, mainly relying on regular mobility patterns, face severe challenges because such behavior is beyond the reach of regularity. As a matter of fact, the prediction of this behavior not only relies on the forecast of novelty-seeking tendency but also depends on how to determine unvisited candidate locations. To this end, we put forward a Collaborative Exploration and Periodically Returning model (CEPR), based on a novel problem, Exploration Prediction (EP), which forecasts whether people will seek unvisited locations to visit, in the following. When people are predicted to do exploration, a state-of-the-art recommendation algorithm, armed with collaborative social knowledge and assisted by geographical influence, will be applied for seeking the suitable candidates; otherwise, a traditional prediction algorithm, incorporating both regularity and the Markov model, will be put into use for figuring out the most possible locations to visit. We then perform case studies on check-ins and evaluate them on two large-scale check-in datasets with 6M and 36M records, respectively. The evaluation results show that EP achieves a roughly 20% classification error rate on both datasets, greatly outperforming the baselines, and that CEPR improves performances by as much as 30% compared to the traditional location prediction algorithms.

References

  1. D. Ashbrook and T. Starner. 2002. Learning significant locations and predicting user movement with GPS. In Proceedings of ISWC’02. IEEE, 101--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Azizyan, I. Constandache, and R. R. Choudhury. 2009. SurroundSense: Mobile phone localization via ambience fingerprinting. In Proceedings of MobiComp’09. ACM, 261--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. L. Bentley and H. A. Maurer. 1980. Efficient worst-case data structures for range searching. Acta Informatica 13, 2 (1980), 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Burges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, and G. Hullender. 2005. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of ICML’05. ACM, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Chang and E. Sun. 2011. Location3: How users share and respond to location-based data on social. In Proceedings of ICWSM’11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. F. Chen and J. Goodman. 1996. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. In Proceedings of ACL’96. ACL, 310--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Cheng, H. Yang, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. 2012. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of AAAI’12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, and D. Z. Sui. 2011. Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. In Proceedings of ICWSM’11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Cho, S. A. Myers, and J. Leskovec. 2011. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of KDD’11. 1082--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Dehnad. 1987. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Technometrics 29, 4 (1987), 495--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Desrosiers and G. Karypis. 2011. A comprehensive survey of neighborhood-based recommendation methods. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 107--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. P. Ebstein, O. Novick, R. Umansky, B. Priel, Y. Osher, D. Blaine, E. R. Bennett, L. Nemanov, M. Katz, and R. H. Belmaker. 1996. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics 12, 1 (1996), 78--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. V. Etter, M. Kafsi, and E. Kazemi. 2012. Been there, done that: What your mobility traces reveal about your behavior. Mobile Data Challenge by Nokia Workshop, in conjunction with Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Gao, J. Tang, X. Hu, and H. Liu. 2013. Modeling temporal effects of human mobile behavior on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of CIKM’13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Gao, J. Tang, and H. Liu. 2012a. Exploring social-historical ties on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of ICWSM’12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Gao, J. Tang, and H. Liu. 2012b. gSCorr: Modeling geo-social correlations for new check-ins on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of CIKM’12. ACM, 1582--1586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Gao, J. Tang, and H. Liu. 2012c. Mobile location prediction in spatio-temporal context. In Proceedings of the Mobile Data Challenge at the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Ge, C. Delgado-Battenfeld, and D. Jannach. 2010. Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of RecSys’10. ACM, 257--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. C. Gonzalez, C. A. Hidalgo, and A. L. Barabasi. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 7196 (2008), 779--782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Vol. 1. Springer New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Hurley and M. Zhang. 2011. Novelty and diversity in top-N recommendation--analysis and evaluation. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 10, 4 (2011), 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Lian and X. Xie. 2011. Learning location naming from user check-in histories. In Proceedings of GIS’11. ACM, 112--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Lian, V. W. Zheng, and X. Xie. 2013. Collaborative filtering meets next check-in location prediction. In Proceedings of WWW’13 Companion. ACM, 231--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Liu and H. Xiong. 2013. Point-of-interest recommendation in location based social networks with topic and location awareness. In Proceedings of SDM’13. SIAM, 396--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Y. Liu. 2009. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 3, 3 (2009), 225--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. McInerney, S. Stein, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2013a. Breaking the habit: Measuring and predicting departures from routine in individual human mobility. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9, 6 (2013), 808--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. McInerney, J. Zheng, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2013b. Modelling heterogeneous location habits in human populations for location prediction under data sparsity. In Proceedings of Ubicomp’13. ACM, 469--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A. Monreale, F. Pinelli, R. Trasarti, and F. Giannotti. 2009. WhereNext: A location predictor on trajectory pattern mining. In Proceedings of KDD’09. ACM, 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, N. Lathia, and C. Mascolo. 2012a. Mining user mobility features for next place prediction in location-based services. In Proceedings of ICDM’12. IEEE, 1038--1043. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, N. Lathia, and C. Mascolo. 2012b. A random walk around the city: New venue recommendation in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of SocialCom’12. IEEE, 144--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. A. Ofstad, E. Nicholas, R. Szcodronski, and R. R. Choudhury. 2008. Aampl: Accelerometer augmented mobile phone localization. In Proceedings of the fi1st ACM International Workshop on Mobile Entity Localization and Tracking in GPS-Less Environments. ACM, 13--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Pan, Y. Zhou, B. Cao, N. N. Liu, R. Lukose, M. Scholz, and Q. Yang. 2008. One-class collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of ICDM’08. IEEE, 502--511. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of UAI’09. AUAI Press, 452--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. A. Sadilek, H. Kautz, and J. P. Bigham. 2012. Finding your friends and following them to where you are. In Proceedings of WSDM’12. ACM, 723--732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. G. Shani, D. Heckerman, and R. I. Brafman. 2005. An MDP-based recommender system. Journal of Machine Learning Research 6 (2005), 1265--1295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. B. Shaw, J. Shea, S. Sinha, and A. Hogue. 2013. Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In Proceedings of WSDM’13. ACM, 717--726. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. C. Song, T. Koren, P. Wang, and A. L. Barabási. 2010a. Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility. Nature Physics 6, 10 (2010), 818--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. C. Song, Z. Qu, N. Blumm, and A. L. Barabási. 2010b. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327, 5968 (2010), 1018--1021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. L. Song, D. Kotz, R. Jain, and X. He. 2004. Evaluating location predictors with extensive Wi-Fi mobility data. In Proceedings of INFOCOM’04, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1414--1424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. M. Szell, R. Sinatra, G. Petri, S. Thurner, and V. Latora. 2012. Understanding mobility in a social petri dish. Scientific Reports 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Y. W. Teh. 2006a. A Bayesian Interpretation of Interpolated Kneser-Ney. Technical Report TRA2/06. School of Computing, National University of Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Y. W. Teh. 2006b. A hierarchical Bayesian language model based on Pitman-Yor processes. In Proceedings of ACL’06. ACL, 985--992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. W. R. Tobler. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (1970), 234--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. S. Vargas and P. Castells. 2011. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In Proceedings of RecSys’11. ACM, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. C. Wang and B. A. Huberman. 2012. How random are online social interactions? Scientific Reports 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. D. Yang, D. Zhang, Z. Yu, and Z. Wang. 2013. A sentiment-enhanced personalized location recommendation system. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT’13). ACM, 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. M. Ye, P. Yin, W.-C. Lee, and D.-L. Lee. 2011. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of SIGIR’11. ACM, 325--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. D. Zhang, C. Chen, Z. Zhou, and B. Li. 2012. Identifying logical location via GPS-enabled mobile phone and wearable camera. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Ma, and S. Feng. 2013. Localized matrix factorization for recommendation based on matrix block diagonal forms. In Proceedings of WWW’13. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1511--1520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. V. W. Zheng, B. Cao, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and Q. Yang. 2010a. Collaborative filtering meets mobile recommendation: A user-centered approach. In Proceedings of AAAI’10. AAAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. V. W. Zheng, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and Q. Yang. 2010b. Collaborative location and activity recommendations with gps history data. In Proceedings of WWW’10. ACM, 1029--1038. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, Z. Ma, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma. 2011. Recommending friends and locations based on individual location history. ACM Transactions on the Web 5, 1 (2011), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CEPR: A Collaborative Exploration and Periodically Returning Model for Location Prediction

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
                ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 6, Issue 1
                April 2015
                255 pages
                ISSN:2157-6904
                EISSN:2157-6912
                DOI:10.1145/2745393
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 20 April 2015
                • Accepted: 1 April 2014
                • Revised: 1 February 2014
                • Received: 1 October 2013
                Published in tist Volume 6, Issue 1

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader