skip to main content
10.1145/2632048.2632058acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Creative collaboration with a social robot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research builds on the UbiComp vision of systems that do not do things for people but engage people in their computational environment so that people can do things for themselves better. In this investigation, we sought to make good on a proof-of-concept where people interact with a social robot whereby the robot helps people to be more humanly creative. Twenty seven participants interacted with ATR's humanoid robot Robovie (through a WoZ interface) in a creativity task. Results supported our proof of concept insofar as 100% of the participants generated creative ideas, and 63% incorporated the robot's ideas into their own ideas for their creative output. Of the participants who had the highest creativity scores, 83% incorporated the robot's ideas into their own. Discussion focuses on next steps toward building the Natural Language Processing system, and integrating the system into a more extensive networked UbiComp environment.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p99-kahn.mov

mov

67.6 MB

p99-kahn.mp4

mp4

4.6 MB

References

  1. Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M. Y., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., & Landay, J. A. (2007). Conducting in situ evaluations for and with ubiquitous computing technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 103--118. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc2201-02_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Darrell, T., Tollmar, K., Bentley, F., Checka, N., Morency, L.-P., Rahimi, A., & Oh, A. (2002). Face-responsive interfaces: From direct manipulation to perceptive presence. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 135--151. doi:10.1007/3-540-45809-3_10 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 399--409. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00105.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, A., Huttenrauch, H., & Eklundh, K. S. (2004). Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 575--580. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374824Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kahn, P. H. Jr., Freier, N. G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 97--104. doi:10.1145/1349822.1349836 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Friedman, B., Severson, R. L., & Feldman, E. N. (2005). Creativity tasks and coding system - Used in the plasma display window study. Retrieved from University of Washington, ResearchWorks Archive website: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/2050Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Miller, J. (2007). What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 8(3), 363--390. doi:10.1075/is.8.3.04kahGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Li, Y., Hong, J., & Landay, J. (2007). Design challenges and principles for Wizard of Oz testing of location-enhanced applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(2), 70--75. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2007.28 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Moher, T. (2006). Embedded phenomena: Supporting science learning with classroom-sized distributed simulations. Proceedings of the 2006 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 691--700. doi:10.1145/1124772.1124875 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Price, R., Lovka, B., & Lovka, R. A. (2000). Droodles: The classic collection. Los Angeles, CA: Tall Fellow Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers, Y. (2006). Moving on from Weiser's cision of calm computing: Engaging UbiComp experiences. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 404--421. doi:10.1007/11853565_24 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rogers, Y., & Muller, H. (2005). A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 1--14. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.05.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Seely Brown, J. (2005). Ubiquitous computing and beyond -- An emerging new common sense model. Retrieved from http://www.johnseelybrown.com/JSB.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro H., & Hagita, N. (2006). Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 305--312. doi:10.1145/1121241.1121293 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010). No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 219--226. doi:10.1145/1734454.1734546 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tantam, D. (2006). The machine as psychotherapist: Impersonal communication with a machine. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, 416--426. doi:10.1192/apt.12.6.416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Volkova, S., Choudhury, P., Quirk, C., Dolan, B., & Zettlemoyer, L. S. (2013). Lightly supervised learning of procedural dialog systems. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1669--1679. Retrieved from http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~lsz/papers/vcqdzacl13.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vyas, D., Nijholt, A., Heylen, D., Kroner, A., & van der Veer, G. (2010). Remarkable objects: Supporting collaboration in a creative environment. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 37--40. doi:10.1145/1864349.1864357 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Creative collaboration with a social robot

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2014
          973 pages
          ISBN:9781450329682
          DOI:10.1145/2632048

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 September 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader