skip to main content
10.1145/2632188.2632200acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluation of text-processing algorithms for adverse drug event extraction from social media

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The discovery of suspected adverse drug reactions is no longer restricted to mining reports that pharmaceutical companies and health professionals send to regulators for possible safety signals. Patient forums and other social media are being studied for additional sources of information to assist in expediting adverse reaction discovery. Extracting information on drugs, adverse drug reactions, diseases and symptoms, or patient demographics from such media is an essential step of this process, but it is not straightforward. While most studies in this area use a lexicon-based information extraction methodology, they do not explicitly evaluate the impact of text-processing steps on their final results. We experimentally quantify the value of the most popular techniques to establish whether or not they benefit the information extraction process.

References

  1. Introductory guide MedDRA version 17.0. Technical Report MSSO-DI-6003-17.0.0, The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), March 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Benton, L. Ungar, S. Hill, S. Hennessy, J. Mao, A. Chung, C. Leonard, and J. Holmes. Identifying potential adverse effects using the web: A new approach to medical hypothesis generation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(6):989--996, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W. Chapman, W. Bridewell, P. Hanbury, G. Cooper, and B. Buchanan. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 34(5):301--310, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. B. Chee, R. Berlin, and B. Schatz. Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pages 217--226, Washington, DC, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Ehsani, T. Jackson, and S. Duckett. The incidence and cost of adverse events in victorian hospitals 2003-04. The Medical Journal of Australia, 184(11):551--555, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Fox and S. Jones. The social life of health information. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, pages 2009--12, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. Hug, C. Keohane, D. Seger, C. Yoon, and D. Bates. The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 38(3):120--126, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Karimi, S. Kim, and L. Cavedon. Drug side-effects: What do patient forums reveal? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Science and Information Exchange in the Medical Web, pages 14--15, Glasgow, UK, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Kuhn, M. Campillos, I. Letunic, L. Jensen, and P. Bork. A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Molecular Systems Biology, 6(1):Article 343, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Leaman, L. Wojtulewicz, R. Sullivan, A. Skariah, J. Yang, and G. Gonzalez. Towards Internet-age pharmacovigilance: Extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 117--125, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Lee, R. Cornet, F. Lau, and N. De Keizer. A survey of SNOMED CT implementations. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(1):87--96, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. Liu and H. Chen. AZDrugminer: An information extraction system for mining patient-reported adverse drug events in online patient forums. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Smart Health, pages 134--150, Beijing, China, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. E. Roughead and S. Semple. Medication safety in acute care in Australia: Where are we now? part 1: A review of the extent and causes of medication problems 2002--2008. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 6(1):18, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. H. Suominen, S. Salanterä, S. Velupillai, W. W. Chapman, G. Savova, N. Elhadad, S. Pradhan, B. R. South, D. L. Mowery, G. J. Jones, et al. Overview of the ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation lab 2013. In Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization, pages 212--231. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Yang, L. Jiang, H. Yang, and X. Tang. Detecting signals of adverse drug reactions from health consumer contributed content in social media. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Health Informatics, Beijing, China, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of text-processing algorithms for adverse drug event extraction from social media

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SoMeRA '14: Proceedings of the first international workshop on Social media retrieval and analysis
          July 2014
          72 pages
          ISBN:9781450330220
          DOI:10.1145/2632188
          • Program Chairs:
          • Markus Schedl,
          • Peter Knees,
          • Jialie Shen

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          SoMeRA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate13of19submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate13of19submissions,68%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader