skip to main content
10.1145/2639108.2639109acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Luxapose: indoor positioning with mobile phones and visible light

Published:07 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We explore the indoor positioning problem with unmodified smartphones and slightly-modified commercial LED luminaires. The luminaires-modified to allow rapid, on-off keying-transmit their identifiers and/or locations encoded in human-imperceptible optical pulses. A camera-equipped smartphone, using just a single image frame capture, can detect the presence of the luminaires in the image, decode their transmitted identifiers and/or locations, and determine the smartphone's location and orientation relative to the luminaires. Continuous image capture and processing enables continuous position updates. The key insights underlying this work are (i) the driver circuits of emerging LED lighting systems can be easily modified to transmit data through on-off keying; (ii) the rolling shutter effect of CMOS imagers can be leveraged to receive many bits of data encoded in the optical transmissions with just a single frame capture, (iii) a camera is intrinsically an angle-of-arrival sensor, so the projection of multiple nearby light sources with known positions onto a camera's image plane can be framed as an instance of a sufficiently-constrained angle-of-arrival localization problem, and (iv) this problem can be solved with optimization techniques. We explore the feasibility of the design through an analytical model, demonstrate the viability of the design through a prototype system, discuss the challenges to a practical deployment including usability and scalability, and demonstrate decimeter-level accuracy in both carefully controlled and more realistic human mobility scenarios.

References

  1. J. Armstrong, Y. A. Sekercioglu, and A. Neild. Visible light positioning: A roadmap for international standardization. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(12), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proc. 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. (INFOCOM '00), volume 2, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Chen, D. Lymberopoulos, J. Liu, and B. Priyantha. FM-based indoor localization. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Chintalapudi, A. Padmanabha Iyer, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Indoor localization without the pain. In Proc. of the 16th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '10), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chung, M. Donahoe, C. Schmandt, I.-J. Kim, P. Razavai, and M. Wiseman. Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '11), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Connolly and D. Boone. Indoor location in retail: Where is the money? ABI Research Report, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Cui, G. Chen, Z. Xu, and R. D. Roberts. Line-of-sight visible light communication system design and demonstration. 7th IEEE IET International Symposium on Communication Systems Networks and Digital Signal Processing, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Danakis, M. Afgani, G. Povey, I. Underwood, and H. Haas. Using a CMOS camera sensor for visible light communication. In IEEE Globecom Workshops, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. C. Dean. Bearings-Only Localization and Mapping. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Jovicic, J. Li, and T. Richardson. Visible light communication: Opportunities, challenges and the path to market. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(12), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Komine and M. Nakagawa. Fundamental analysis for visible-light communication system using LED lights. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 50(1), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Li, P. Hu, C. Peng, G. Shen, and F. Zhao. Epsilon: A visible light based positioning system. In Proc. of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '14), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Lorincz and M. Welsh. Motetrack: A robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 11(6), Aug. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Martin, O. Vinyals, G. Friedland, and R. Bajcsy. Precise indoor localization using smart phones. In Proc. of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Microsoft. PhotoCaptureDevice class. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsphone/develop/windows.phone.media.capture.photocapturedevice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nokia. Camera explorer. https://github.com/nokia-developer/camera-explorer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. Otsu. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9(1), 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. B. Prince and T. D. Little. A two phase hybrid RSS/AoA algorithm for indoor device localization using visible light. In IEEE Global Communication Conference (GLOBECOM '12), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. S. Rahman, M. M. Haque, and K.-D. Kim. Indoor positioning by led visible light communication and image sensors. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 1(2), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Rajagopal, P. Lazik, and A. Rowe. Visual light landmarks for mobile devices. In Proc. of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '14), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Rajagopal, R. D. Roberts, and S.-K. Lim. IEEE 802.15.7 visible light communication: Modulation schemes and dimming support. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(3), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Richardson, J. Strom, and E. Olson. AprilCal: Assisted and repeatable camera calibration. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '13), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Sakata, Y. Yasumuro, M. Imura, Y. Manabe, and K. Chihara. Location system for indoor wearable PC users. In Workshop on Advanced Computing and Communicating Techniques for Wearable Information Playing, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Suzuki et al. Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 30(1), 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Tan and N. Narendran. A driving scheme to reduce AC LED flicker. Optical Engineering, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Xiong and K. Jamieson. ArrayTrack: A fine-grained indoor location system. In Proc. of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '13), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S.-H. Yang, E.-M. Jeong, D.-R. Kim, H.-S. Kim, Y.-H. Son, and S.-K. Han. Indoor three-dimensional location estimation based on LED visible light communication. Electronics Letters, 49(1), January 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Z. Yang, C. Wu, and Y. Liu. Locating in fingerprint space: Wireless indoor localization with little human intervention. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Yoshino, S. Haruyama, and M. Nakagawa. High-accuracy positioning system using visible LED lights and image sensor. In IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS '08), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. A. Youssef and A. Agrawala. The Horus WLAN location determination system. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '05), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Z. Zhou, M. Kavehrad, and P. Deng. Indoor positioning algorithm using light-emitting diode visible light communications. Optical Engineering, 51(8), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Luxapose: indoor positioning with mobile phones and visible light

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiCom '14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
          September 2014
          650 pages
          ISBN:9781450327831
          DOI:10.1145/2639108

          Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2014

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiCom '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of220submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        ePub

        View this article in ePub.

        View ePub