skip to main content
10.1145/2642918.2647377acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Physical telepresence: shape capture and display for embodied, computer-mediated remote collaboration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a new approach to Physical Telepresence, based on shared workspaces with the ability to capture and remotely render the shapes of people and objects. In this paper, we describe the concept of shape transmission, and propose interaction techniques to manipulate remote physical objects and physical renderings of shared digital content. We investigate how the representation of user's body parts can be altered to amplify their capabilities for teleoperation. We also describe the details of building and testing prototype Physical Telepresence workspaces based on shape displays. A preliminary evaluation shows how users are able to manipulate remote objects, and we report on our observations of several different manipulation techniques that highlight the expressive nature of our system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uistf2493-file3.mp4

mp4

73.7 MB

References

  1. Benko, H., Jota, R., and Wilson, A. MirageTable: freehand interaction on a projected augmented reality tabletop. In ACM CHI '12 (2012), 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brave, S., Ishii, H., and Dahley, A. Tangible interfaces for remote collaboration and communication. In ACM CSCW '98 (Nov. 1998), 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cutkosky, M., and Howe, R. Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In Dextrous Robot Hands, S. Venkataraman and T. Iberall, Eds. Springer New York, 1990, 5--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Everitt, K. M., Klemmer, S. R., Lee, R., and Landay, J. A. Two worlds apart: bridging the gap between physical and virtual media for distributed design collaboration. In ACM CHI '03 (Apr. 2003), 553--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Festo. WaveHandling: Transporting and sorting in one. In http://www.festo.com/cms/en corp/13136.htm (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Follmer, S., Leithinger, D., Olwal, A., Cheng, N., and Ishii, H. Jamming user interfaces: programmable particle stiffness and sensing for malleable and shape-changing devices. In ACM UIST '12 (Oct. 2012), 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Follmer, S., Leithinger, D., Olwal, A., Hogge, A., and Ishii, H. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In ACM UIST '13 (Oct. 2013), 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Genecov, A. M., Stanley, A. A., and Okamura, A. M. Perception of a Haptic Jamming display: Just noticeable differences in stiffness and geometry. In 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), IEEE (Feb. 2014), 333--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gross, M., Lang, S., Strehlke, K., Moere, A. V., Staadt, O., Wüurmlin, S., Naef, M., Lamboray, E., Spagno, C., Kunz, A., Koller-Meier, E., Svoboda, T., and Van Gool, L. blue-c: a spatially immersive display and 3D video portal for telepresence. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3 (July 2003), 819--827. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hilliges, O., Kim, D., Izadi, S., Weiss, M., and Wilson, A. HoloDesk: direct 3d interactions with a situated see-through display. In ACM CHI '12 (May 2012), 2421--2430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ishii, H., and Kobayashi, M. ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. In ACM CHI '92 (June 1992), 525--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Iwata, H., Yano, H., Nakaizumi, F., and Kawamura, R. Project FEELEX: adding haptic surface to graphics. In ACM SIGGRAPH '01 (Aug. 2001), 469--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, M. K., and Takayama, L. "Now, i have a body": uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In ACM CHI '11 (May 2011), 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leithinger, D., Follmer, S., Olwal, A., Luescher, S., Hogge, A., Lee, J., and Ishii, H. Sublimate: state-changing virtual and physical rendering to augment interaction with shape displays. In ACM CHI '13 (Apr. 2013), 1441--1450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Leithinger, D., Lakatos, D., DeVincenzi, A., Blackshaw, M., and Ishii, H. Direct and gestural interaction with relief: a 2.5D shape display. In ACM UIST '11 (Oct. 2011), 541--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lum, M. J., Rosen, J., Lendvay, T. S., Sinanan, M. N., and Hannaford, B. Effect of time delay on telesurgical performance. In IEEE ICRA'09 (2009), 4246--4252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mann, S. Telepointer: Hands-Free Completely Self Contained Wearable Visual Augmented Reality without Headwear and without any Infrastructural Reliance. In 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Oct. 2000), 177--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mueller, F. F., Cole, L., O'Brien, S., and Walmink, W. Airhockey over a distance. In CHI '06 extended abstracts (Apr. 2006), 1133--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pangaro, G., Maynes-Aminzade, D., and Ishii, H. The actuated workbench: computer-controlled actuation in tabletop tangible interfaces. In ACM UIST '02 (Oct. 2002), 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Paul, R. P. Robot manipulators: mathematics, programming, and control: the computer control of robot manipulators. Richard Paul, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paulos, E., and Canny, J. PRoP: personal roving presence. In ACM CHI '98 (Jan. 1998), 296--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Piper, B., and Ishii, H. PegBlocks: a learning aid for the elementary classroom. In ACM CHI '02 extended abstracts (Apr. 2002), 686--687. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., and Okabe, M. Actuation and Tangible User Interfaces: the Vaucanson Duck, Robots, and Shape Displays. In ACM TEI '07 (Feb. 2007), 205--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., and Fuchs, H. The office of the future: a unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. In ACM SIGGRAPH '98 (July 1998), 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rasmussen, M. K., Pedersen, E. W., Petersen, M. G., and Hornbæ k, K. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. In ACM CHI '12 (May 2012), 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Richter, J., Thomas, B. H., Sugimoto, M., and Inami, M. Remote active tangible interactions. In ACM TEI '07 (Feb. 2007), 39--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Riedenklau, E., Hermann, T., and Ritter, H. An integrated multi-modal actuated tangible user interface for distributed collaborative planning. In ACM TEI '12 (Feb. 2012), 169--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sodhi, R. S., Jones, B. R., Forsyth, D., Bailey, B. P., and Maciocci, G. BeThere: 3D mobile collaboration with spatial input. In ACM CHI '13 (Apr. 2013), 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Staub, C., Ono, K., Mayer, H., Knoll, A., Ulbrich, H., and Bauernschmitt, R. Remote minimally invasive surgery --haptic feedback and selective automation in medical robotics. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 8, 2 (Apr. 2011), 221--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tang, J. C., and Minneman, S. VideoWhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration. In ACM CHI '91 (Mar. 1991), 315--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tang, J. C., and Minneman, S. L. Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9, 2 (Apr. 1991), 170--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., Yanco, H. A., and Uhlik, C. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In ACM/IEEE HRI '11 (Mar. 2011), 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wilson, A. D., and Robbins, D. C. Playtogether: Playing games across multiple interactive tabletops. In IUI Workshop on Tangible Play: Research and Design for Tangible and Tabletop Games (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yarosh, S., Tang, A., Mokashi, S., and Abowd, G. D. "almost touching": parent-child remote communication using the sharetable system. In ACM CSCW '13 (Feb. 2013), 181--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Physical telepresence: shape capture and display for embodied, computer-mediated remote collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2014
      722 pages
      ISBN:9781450330695
      DOI:10.1145/2642918

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '14 Paper Acceptance Rate74of333submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader