skip to main content
10.1145/2649387.2649398acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

SideEffectPTM: an unsupervised topic model to mine adverse drug reactions from health forums

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automatic discovery of medical knowledge using data mining has great potential benefit in improving population health and reducing healthcare cost. Discovering adverse drug reaction (ADR) is especially important because of the significant morbidity of ADRs to patients. Recently, more and more patients describe the ADRs they experienced and seek for help through online health forums, creating great opportunities for these forums to discover previously unknown ADRs.

In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised approach to tap into the increasingly available health forums to mine the side effect symptoms of drugs mentioned by forum users. Our approach is based on a novel probabilistic mixture model of symptoms, where the side effect symptoms and disease symptoms are explicitly modeled with two separate component models, and discovery of side effect symptoms can be achieved in an unsupervised way through fitting the mixture model to the forum data. Extensive experiments on online health forums demonstrate that our proposed model is effective for discovering the reported ADRs on forums in a completely unsupervised way. The mined knowledge using our model is directly useful for increasing our understanding of more challenging ADRs, such as long-term side effects, drug-drug interactions, and rare side effects. Since our approach is unsupervised, it can be applied to mining large amounts of growing forum data to discover new knowledge about ADRs, helping many patients become aware of possible ADRs.

References

  1. D. W. Bates and et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA, 274(1):29--34, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. W. Bates and et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA, 277(4):307--311, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. JMLR, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. O. Bodenreider. The unified medical language system (umls): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic acids research, 32(suppl 1):D267--D270, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. U. A. Boelsterli. Diclofenac-induced liver injury: a paradigm of idiosyncratic drug toxicity. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 192(3):307--322, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. W. Chee, R. Berlin, and B. Schatz. Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages. In AMIA, volume 2011, page 217. American Medical Informatics Association, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Crenshaw. Prozac and premature ejaculation. In Annual Meeting of the American Association of Sex Educators, Counselors and Therapists, Orlando, FL, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Davidson. Seizures and bupropion: a review. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 50(7):256--261, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. eHealthMe. Review: could ativan(r) cause high blood sugar? http://www.ehealthme.com/ds/Ativan(R)/high+blood+sugar, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. eHealthMe. Review: could phentermine cause bone and joint pain? http://www.ehealthme.com/ds/phentermine/bone+and+joint+pain, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. for Disease Control, P. (CDC, et al. Adverse events associated with ephedrine-containing products--texas, december 1993-september 1995. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 45(32):689, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Friedman. Discovering novel adverse drug events using natural language processing and mining of the electronic health record. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, pages 1--5. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. M. Giacomini and et al. When good drugs go bad. Nature, 446(7139):975--977, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR'99, pages 50--57. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Hornby. Effects of methadone with xanax. http://www.livestrong.com/article/260570-effects-of-methadone-with-xanax/, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Jiang, Q. V. Liao, Q. Cheng, R. B. Berlin, and B. R. Schatz. Designing and evaluating a clustering system for organizing and integrating patient drug outcomes in personal health messages. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, volume 2012, page 417. American Medical Informatics Association, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. J. Kish. Pharmacologic mechanisms of crystal meth. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178(13):1679--1682, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Leaman, L. Wojtulewicz, R. Sullivan, A. Skariah, J. Yang, and G. Gonzalez. Towards internet-age pharmacovigilance: extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. In 2010 workshop on biomedical natural language processing, pages 117--125. ACL, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Leone and et al. Drug-related deaths. Drug Safety, 31(8):703--713, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Lindquist and et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the who international database. Drug Safety, 23(6):533--542, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Liu, A. Li, and S. Seneff. Automatic drug side effect discovery from online patient-submitted reviews: Focus on statin drugs. In IMMM 2011, pages 91--96, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. X. Liu and H. Chen. Azdrugminer: an information extraction system for mining patient-reported adverse drug events in online patient forums. In Smart Health, pages 134--150. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Y. Lu and C. Zhai. Opinion integration through semi-supervised topic modeling. In WWW'08, pages 121--130. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. R. Nebeker, P. Barach, and M. H. Samore. Clarifying adverse drug events: a clinician's guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Annals of internal medicine, 140(10):795--801, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Parker. Zoloft drug interactions. http://www.drugsdb.com/rx/zoloft/zoloft-drug-interactions/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Pirmohamed, A. M. Breckenridge, N. R. Kitteringham, and B. K. Park. Fortnightly review: adverse drug reactions. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 316(7140):1295, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. C. Prather and et al. Medical data mining: knowledge discovery in a clinical data warehouse. In AMIA, page 101. American Medical Informatics Association, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. D. Ramage, D. Hall, R. Nallapati, and C. D. Manning. Labeled lda: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In EMNLP: Volume 1-Volume 1, pages 248--256. ACL, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. P. Sondhi, J. Sun, H. Tong, and C. Zhai. Sympgraph: a framework for mining clinical notes through symptom relation graphs. In KDD'12, pages 1167--1175. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T. Ulrich. Drug safety and side effects: Detection, or prediction? http://vectorblog.org/2012/01/drug-safety-and-side-effects-detection-or-prediction/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C. S. van Der Hooft and et al. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalisations. Drug Safety, 29(2):161--168, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. B. J. Welch and et al. Biochemical and stone-risk profiles with topiramate treatment. American journal of kidney diseases, 48(4):555--563, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. R. W. White and E. Horvitz. Studies of the onset and persistence of medical concerns in search logs. In SIGIR'12, pages 265--274. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. Wu, H. Fang, and S. J. Stanhope. An early warning system for unrecognized drug side effects discovery. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web, pages 437--440. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. T.-Y. Wu and et al. Ten-year trends in hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in england 1999--2009. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(6):239--250, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. A. Yates and N. Goharian. Adrtrace: detecting expected and unexpected adverse drug reactions from user reviews on social media sites. In Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 816--819. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. A. Yates, N. Goharian, and O. Frieder. Extracting adverse drug reactions from forum posts and linking them to drugs. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGIR Workshop on Health Search and Discovery, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Q. Zeng, S. Kogan, N. Ash, R. Greenes, and A. Boxwala. Characteristics of consumer terminology for health information retrieval. Methods of information in medicine, 41(4):289--298, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SideEffectPTM: an unsupervised topic model to mine adverse drug reactions from health forums

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        BCB '14: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
        September 2014
        851 pages
        ISBN:9781450328944
        DOI:10.1145/2649387
        • General Chairs:
        • Pierre Baldi,
        • Wei Wang

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader