skip to main content
research-article

A Model for Context in the Design of Open Production Communities

Published:12 November 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Open production communities (OPCs) provide technical features and social norms for a vast but dispersed and diverse crowd to collectively accumulate content. In OPCs, certain mechanisms, policies, and technologies are provided for voluntary users to participate in community-related activities including content generation, evaluation, qualification, and distribution and in some cases even community governance. Due to the known complexities and dynamism of online communities, designing a successful community is deemed more an art than a science. Numerous studies have investigated different aspects of certain types of OPCs. Most of these studies, however, fall short of delivering a general view or prescription due to their narrow focus on a certain type of OPCs. In contribution to theories on technology-mediated social participation (TMSP), this study synthesizes the streams of research in the particular area of OPCs and delivers a theoretical framework as a baseline for adapting findings from one specific type of community on another. This framework consists of four primary dimensions, namely, platform features, content, user, and community. The corresponding attributes of these dimensions and the existing interdependencies are discussed in detail. Furthermore, a decision diagram for selecting features and a design guideline for “decontextualizing” findings are introduced as possible applications of the framework. The framework also provides a new and reliable foundation on which future research can extend its findings and prescriptions in a systematic way.

References

  1. E. Agichtein, C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, and G. Mishne. 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining. ACM, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Y. Amichai-Hamburger. 2005. Internet minimal group paradigm. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8, 2, 140--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Andreoni. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal 100, 401, 464--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. O. Arazy, O. Nov, R. Patterson, and L. Yeo. 2011. Information quality in wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems 27, 4, 71--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. F. Awad and M. Krishnan. 2006. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly 30, 1, 13--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. Ballou, R. Wang, H. Pazer, and G. Kumar. 1998. Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality. Management Science 44, 4, 462--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Bandura. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 1, 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. J. Bateman, P. H. Gray, and B. S. Butler. 2011. The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Information Systems Research 22, 4, 841--854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Benbya, G. Passiante, and N. Aissa Belbaly. 2004. Corporate portal: A tool for knowledge management synchronization. International Journal of Information Management 24, 3, 201--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Benkler. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Benlian and T. Hess. 2011. The signaling role of it features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15, 4, 7--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Bischoff, C. S. Firan, W. Nejdl, and R. Paiu. 2008. Can all tags be used for search? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. L. Blanchard and M. L. Markus. 2007. Technology and community behavior in online environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T'07). Springer, 323--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. W. Bock, R. W. Zmud, Y. G. Kim, and J. N. Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29, 1, 87--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Bolici, J. Howison, and K. Crowston. 2009. Coordination without discussion? Socio-technical congruence and stigmergy in free and open source software projects. In Proceedings of Socio-Technical Congruence Workshop in Conjunction with the International Conference on Software Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. E. Bolton and A. Ockenfels. 2000. Erc: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90, 1, 166--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. B. Brandtzæg and J. Heim. 2008. User loyalty and online communities: Why members of online communities are not faithful. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Bruns. 2005. Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. Peter Lang. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Bruns. 2006. Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. In Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology, F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, and C. Ess (Eds.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. L. Bryant, A. Forte, and A. Bruckman. 2005. Becoming wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (SIGGROUP'05). ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B. S. Butler. 2001. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research 12, 4, 346--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. S. Butler, N. Sharma, J. Irwin, and H. Spallek. 2010. “You are not alone”: Effects of highlighting social aspects on responsiveness, joining, and profile information sharing in an information portal. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST'10). 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Carmel, H. Roitman, and E. Yom-Tov. 2010. On the relationship between novelty and popularity of user-generated content. In ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3, 4, 1509--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Chen, F. M. Harper, J. Konstan, and S. Xin Li. 2010. Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. American Economic Review 100, 4, 1358--1398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Cheng and J. Vassileva. 2006. Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16, 3, 321--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C. Cheshire and K. S. Cook. 2004. The emergence of trust networks under uncertainty--implications for internet interactions. Analyse & Kritik 26, 1, 220--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. S. Chung and S. Nah. 2009. The effects of interactive news presentation on perceived user satisfaction of online community newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 4, 855--874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. E. Chung, N. Park, H. Wang, J. Fulk, and M. McLaughlin. 2010. Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6, 1674--1684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Colazo and Y. Fang. 2009. Impact of license choice on open source software development activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 5, 997--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. D. Constant, S. Kiesler, and L. Sproull. 1994. What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research 5, 4, 400--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. N. S. Contractor, S. Wasserman, and K. Faust. 2006. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review 31, 3, 681--703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. D. Couger. 1996. Creativity & Innovation in Information Systems Organizations. Boyd & Fraser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. K. Crowston, K. Wei, Q. Li, and J. Howison. 2006. Core and periphery in free/libre and open source software team communications. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06). IEEE, 118a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. J. N. Cummings. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 50, 3, 352--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. D. Cyr. 2014. Return visits: A review of how web site design can engender visitor loyalty. Journal of Information Technology 29, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. L. Dabbish, R. Farzan, R. Kraut, and T. Postmes. 2012. Fresh faces in the crowd: Turnover, identity, and commitment in online groups. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'12). ACM, 245--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, R. West, D. Jurafsky, J. Leskovec, and C. Potts. 2013. No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference (WWW'13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Daniel, R. Agarwal, and K. J. Stewart. 2013. The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Information Systems Research 24, 2, 312--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8, 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. L. De Alfaro, A. Kulshreshtha, I. Pye, and B. T. Adler. 2011. Reputation systems for open collaboration. Communications of the ACM 54, 8, 81--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. X. Deng and L. Chi. 2012. Understanding postadoptive behaviors in information systems use: A longitudinal analysis of system use problems in the business intelligence context. Journal of Management Information Systems 29, 3, 291--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. U. M. Dholakia, R. P. Bagozzi, and L. K. Pearo. 2004. A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21, 3, 241--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. N. Diakopoulos and M. Naaman. 2011. Towards quality discourse in online news comments. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'11). ACM, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. J. Dovey and H. W. Kennedy. 2006. Game Cultures: Computer Games as New Media. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. W. Emigh and S. C. Herring. 2005. Collaborative authoring on the web: A genre analysis of online encyclopedias. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 99a-99a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Y. Engeström. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory 19--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. J. A. Espinosa, S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut, and J. D. Herbsleb. 2007. Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science 18, 4, 613--630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. S. Faraj, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. Majchrzak. 2011. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science 22, 5, 1224--1239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. R. Farzan, R. Kraut, A. Pal, and J. Konstan. 2012. Socializing volunteers in an online community: A field experiment. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. G. Fischer. 2009. End-user development and meta-design: Foundations for cultures of participation. In End-User Development. 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger. 2007. The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society 9, 2, 319--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. B. Fogg, C. Soohoo, D. R. Danielson, L. Marable, J. Stanford, and E. R. Tauber. 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites?: A study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences. ACM, 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. A. Forte and C. Lampe. 2013. Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. J. Fulk and J. J. Gould. 2009. Features and contexts in technology research: A modest proposal for research and reporting. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 3, 764--770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. S. Gauch, M. Speretta, A. Chandramouli, and A. Micarelli. 2007. User profiles for personalized information access. The Adaptive Web 54--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. D. Gefen and C. M. Ridings. 2005. If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: A sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities. ACM SIGMIS Database 36, 2, 78--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. C. George and J. Scerri. 2007. Web 2.0 and user-generated content: Legal challenges in the new frontier. Journal of Information, Law and Technology 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Gladwell. 2006. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Y. R. Guillaume, F. C. Brodbeck, and M. Riketta. 2012. Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 85, 1, 80--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. D. Gurzick and W. G. Lutters. 2009. Towards a design theory for online communities. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. ACM, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. J. Han, T. Abdelzaher, C. Zhai, and J. Yu. 2012. Mining the Relation and Implication of User Generated Content in Social Media. Graduate College Doctor of Philosophy. Thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. A. B. Hargadon and B. A. Bechky. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science 17, 4, 484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. A. Hars and S. Ou. 2002. Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 3, 25--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. C. Haythornthwaite. 2009. Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. J. D. Herbsleb. 2007. Global software engineering: The future of socio-technical coordination. In Proceedings of Future of Software Engineering (FOSE'07). IEEE Computer Society, 188--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. B. M. Hill and A. Monroy-Hernández. 2013. The remixing dilemma the trade-off between generativity and originality. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5, 643--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. B. Hilligoss and S. Y. Rieh. 2008. Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management 44, 4, 1467--1484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. D. Hinds and R. M. Lee. 2008. Social network structure as a critical success condition for virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. P. Hinds and C. McGrath. 2006. Structures that work: Social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'06). ACM, 343--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. P. Holmes and A. M. Cox. 2011. Every group carries the flavour of the admins: Leadership on flickr. International Journal of Web Based Communities 7, 3, 376--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. J. Howison and K. Crowston. 2014. Collaboration through superposition: How the IT artifact as an object of collaboration affords technical interdependence without organizational interdependence. MIS Quarterly 38, 1, 29--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. G. Hsieh, Y. Hou, I. Chen, and K. N. Truong. 2013. Welcome!: Social and psychological predictors of volunteer socializers in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'13). ACM, 827--838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. 2009. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science 35, 6, 758--765. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. J. Hughes and K. Lang. 2006. Transmutability: Digital decontextualization, manipulation, and recontextualization as a new source of value in the production and consumption of culture products. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06). IEEE, 165a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. J. Introne and R. Alterman. 2006. Using shared representations to improve coordination and intent inference. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16, 3, 249--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. A. Iriberri and G. Leroy. 2009. A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 41, 2, 11:11--11:29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. S. L. Jarvenpaa and D. S. Staples. 2000. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9, 2, 129--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. K. A. Jehn, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 4, 741-- 763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. C. Jensen and W. Scacchi. 2007. Role migration and advancement processes in ossd projects: A comparative case study. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07). IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. L. B. Jeppesen and K. Laursen. 2009. The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Research Policy 38, 10, 1582--1589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Q. Jones, G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli. 2004. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research 15, 2, 194--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. J. Karat. 1997. Evolving the scope of user-centered design. Communications of the ACM 40, 7, 33--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. P. Keinz and R. Prügl. 2010. A user community based approach to leveraging technological competences: An exploratory case study of a technology start up from mit. Creativity and Innovation Management 19, 3, 269--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. E. Khabiri, C. F. Hsu, and J. Caverlee. 2009. Analyzing and predicting community preference of socially generated metadata: A case study on comments in the digg community. In Proceedings of the 3rd International ICWSM Conference. San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. A. J. Kim. 2000. Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. B. Kim and I. Han. 2009. The role of trust belief and its antecedents in a community driven knowledge environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 5, 1012--1026. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. A. Kittur and R. E. Kraut. 2010. Beyond wikipedia: Coordination and conflict in online production groups. In Proceedings of the ACM 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'10). ACM, 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. A. Kittur, J. V. Nickerson, M. Bernstein, E. Gerber, A. Shaw, J. Zimmerman, M. Lease, and J. Horton. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'13). ACM, 1301--1318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. A. Kittur, B. Pendleton, and R. E. Kraut. 2009. Herding the cats: The influence of groups in coordinating peer production. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM, Article number 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. J. Koh, Y.-G. Kim, B. Butler, and G.-W. Bock. 2007. Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM 50, 2, 68--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. J. A. Konstan and J. Riedl. 2012. Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience. In User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 1--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. R. Kraut, M. L. Maher, J. Olson, T. W. Malone, P. Pirolli, and J. C. Thomas. 2010. Scientific foundations: A case for technology-mediated social-participation theory. Computer 43, 11, 22--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. R. E. Kraut and P. Resnick. 2011a. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. R. E. Kraut and P. Resnick. 2011b. Encouraging Contribution to Online Communities. Building Successful Online Communities. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. K. Kuutti. 1996. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. 17--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. H.-M. Lai and P.-J. Hsieh. 2013. The decision to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities: The moderating role of knowledge-sharing experience and knowledge self-efficacy. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS'13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. S. T. K. Lam, A. Uduwage, Z. Dong, S. Sen, D. R. Musicant, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. 2011. Wp: clubhouse?: An exploration of wikipedia's gender imbalance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. C. Lampe, R. Wash, A. Velasquez, and E. Ozkaya. 2010. Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, 1927-- 1936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. J. M. Leimeister, P. Sidiras, and H. Krcmar. 2006. Exploring success factors of virtual communities: The perspectives of members and operators. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 16, 3, 279--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. K. Lerman. 2007. User participation in social media: Digg study. In Proceedings of the International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE, 255--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. L. Leung. 2009. User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society 11, 8, 1327--1347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. A. Lev-On. 2013. Communities, crowds and focal sites: Fine-tuning the theoretical grounding of collaboration online. Journal of Community Informatics 9, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. H.-F. Lin. 2007. The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: An empirical study. Internet Research 17, 2, 119--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. C. Lindquist. 2005. Fixing the requirements mess. CIO Magazine, 52--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. K. Ling, G. Beenen, X. D. Wang, K. Chang, D. Frankowski, P. Resnick, and R. Kraut. 2005. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. J. Lou, Y. Fang, K. H. Lim, and J. Z. Peng. 2013. Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&a communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, 2, 356--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. K. Luther and A. Bruckman. 2008. Leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'08). ACM, 343--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. K. Luther, C. Fiesler, and A. Bruckman. 2013. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. M. Ma and R. Agarwal. 2007. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research 18, 1, 42--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. W. Ma and A. Yuen. 2011. Gender differences of knowledge sharing in online learning environment. In Hybrid Learning. 116--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. T. W. Malone and K. Crowston. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR'94) 26, 1, 87--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. T. W. Malone, R. Laubacher, and C. Dellarocas. 2010. The collective intelligence genome. IEEE Engineering Management Review 38, 3, 38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. L. Mamykina, B. Manoim, M. Mittal, G. Hripcsak, and B. Hartmann. 2011. Design lessons from the fastest Q&a site in the west. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2857--2866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. E. Mannix and M. A. Neale. 2005. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6, 2, 31--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. P. J. McKenzie, J. Burkell, L. Wong, C. Whippey, S. E. Trosow, and M. B. McNally. 2012. User-generated online content 1: Overview, current state and context. First Monday 17, 6--4, June 4, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. M. B. McNally, S. E. Trosow, L. Wong, C. Whippey, J. Burkell, and P. J. McKenzie. 2012. User-generated online content 2: Policy implications. First Monday 17, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. M. J. Metzger. 2007. Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 13, 2078--2091. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin, and R. B. Medders. 2010. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication 60, 3, 413--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. N. Michinov, E. Michinov, and M. C. Toczek-Capelle. 2004. Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 8, 1, 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. C. Nass and L. Mason. 1990. On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. Organizations and Communication Technology 46, 67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. S. Niederer and J. van Dijck. 2010. Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society 12, 8 (December 2010), 1368--1387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. O. Nov, M. Naaman, and C. Ye. 2010. Analysis of participation in an online photo sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 3, 555--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. V. L. O'Day, D. G. Bobrow, and M. Shirley. 1996. The social-technical design circle. In Proceedings of the ACM 1996 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96). ACM, 160--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. S. O'Mahony and F. Ferraro. 2007. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal 50, 5, 1079--1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. T. Olsson. 2009. Understanding collective content: Purposes, characteristics and collaborative practices. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T'09). ACM, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. S. Oreg and O. Nov. 2008. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5, 2055--2073. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. E. Ostrom. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 5939, 419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. G. Paliouras. 2012. Discovery of web user communities and their role in personalization. In User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. M. Parikh and S. Verma. 2002. Utilizing internet technologies to support learning: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Information Management 22, 1, 27--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. U. Pfeil, P. Zaphiris, and C. S. Ang. 2006. Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1, 88--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. T. Poorisat, B. H. Detenber, V. Viswanathan, and H. Nofrina. 2009. Perceptions of credibility: A comparison of user-generated and expert-generated websites. In Proceedings of the International Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. C. E. Porter, N. Donthu, and A. Baker. 2012. Gender differences in trust formation in virtual communities. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20, 1, 39--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. J. Preece. 2001. Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology 20, 5, 347--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. J. Preece and B. Shneiderman. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1, 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  135. N. R. Quigley, P. E. Tesluk, E. A. Locke, and K. M. Bartol. 2007. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science 18, 1, 71--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. D. R. Raban, M. Moldovan, and Q. Jones. 2010. An empirical study of critical mass and online community survival. In Proceedings of the ACM 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'10). ACM, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. L. Rainie and B. Tancer. 2007. Wikipedia: When in doubt, multitudes seek it out. Pew Internet & American Life Project 12, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. N. C. Ramiller and E. B. Swanson. 2003. Organizing visions for information technology and the information systems executive response. Journal of Management Information Systems 20, 1, 13--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. P. Reiser. 2008. Community Equity Overview. Sun Microsystems Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. S. Reiss. 2004. Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology 8, 3, 179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  141. Y. Ren, F. M. Harper, S. Drenner, L. Terveen, S. Kiesler, J. Riedl, and R. E. Kraut. 2012. Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly 36, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. C. M. Ridings, D. Gefen, and B. Arinze. 2002. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3, 271--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  143. C. Riedl, I. Blohm, J. M. Leimeister, and H. Krcmar. 2010. Rating scales for collective intelligence in innovation communities: Why quick and easy decision making does not get it right. In Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. L. P. Robert. 2013. A multi-level analysis of the impact of shared leadership in diverse virtual teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'13). ACM, 363--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. V. Sambamurthy and M. Subramani. 2005. Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quarterly 29, 2, 193--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  146. F. Schwagereit, A. Scherp, and S. Staab. 2011. Survey on governance of user-generated content in web communities. In Proceedings of the ACM WebSci'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. H. Shin, J. Lee, and K. Hwang. 2010. Separating the reputation and the sociability of online community users. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'10). ACM, 1807--1814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. S. Siersdorfer, J. San Pedro, and M. Sanderson. 2009. Automatic video tagging using content redundancy. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 395--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. T. Simonite. 2013. The decline of wikipedia. MIT Technology Review 116, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. P. Spagnoletti and A. Resca. 2012. A design theory for it supporting online communities. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE, 4082--4091. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  151. J. Sternberg. 2012. Misbehavior in Cyber Places: The Regulation of Online Conduct in Virtual Communities on the Internet. University Press of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. K. J. Stewart and T. Ammeter. 2002. An exploratory study of factors influencing the level of vitality and popularity of open source projects. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems. 853--857.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. S. A. Stumpf and M. London. 1981. Capturing rater policies in evaluating candidates for promotion. Academy of Management Journal 24, 4, 752--766.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. B. Stvilia, L. Gasser, M. B. Twidale, and L. C. Smith. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 12, 1720--1733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. G. Szabo and B. A. Huberman. 2010. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM 53, 8, 80--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. H.-H. Teo, H.-C. Chan, K.-K. Wei, and Z. Zhang. 2003. Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 5, 671--697. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  157. E. Trist. 1981. The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional Paper. 2. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. P. Valcke and M. Lenaerts. 2010. Who's author, editor and publisher in user-generated content? Applying traditional media concepts to ugc providers. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24, 1, 119--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  159. A. H. Van de Ven, A. L. Delbecq, and R. Koenig Jr. 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 322--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. I. Varlamis. 2010. Quality of content in Web 2.0 applications. In Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. J. Vassileva. 2012. Motivating participation in social computing applications: A user modeling perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1--2, 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. J. Vassileva and L. Sun. 2007. Using community visualization to stimulate participation in online communities. E-Service Journal 6, 1, 3--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  163. A. Velasquez, R. Wash, C. Lampe, and T. Bjornrud. 2014. Latent users in an online user-generated content community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23, 1, 21--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46, 2, 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  165. V. Venkatesh and S. Goyal. 2010. Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quarterly 34, 2, 281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. G. S. von Krogh, S. Haefliger, S. Spaeth, and M. W. Wallin. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly 36, 2, 649--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  167. H. Wang, J. E. Chung, N. Park, M. L. McLaughlin, and J. Fulk. 2011. Understanding online community participation: A technology acceptance perspective. Communication Research 39, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Y. Wang and D. R. Fesenmaier. 2003. Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets 13, 1, 33--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  169. H. T. Welser, E. Gleave, D. Fisher, and M. Smith. 2007. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure 8, 2, 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. B. Whitworth. 2009. The social requirements of technical systems. Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. Vol. 1. IGI, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. D. M. Wilkinson. 2008. Strong regularities in online peer production. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), Stanford, CA: ACM, 302--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  172. T. Wöhner and R. Peters. 2009. Assessing the quality of wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM, 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. E. Yaari, S. Baruchson-Arbib, and J. Bar-Ilan. 2011. Information quality assessment of community generated content: A user study of wikipedia. Journal of Information Science 37, 5, 487--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. D. Yates, C. Wagner, and A. Majchrzak. 2010. Factors affecting shapers of organizational wikis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 3, 543--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Y. Ye, K. Nakakoji, Y. Yamamoto, and K. Kishida. 2005. The co-evolution of systems and communities in free and open source software development. Free/Open Source Software Development 59--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. E. Yukselturk and S. Bulut. 2009. Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society 12, 3, 12--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Y. Zheng, K. Zhao, and A. Stylianou. 2013. The impacts of information quality and system quality on users' continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems 56, 513--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  178. Y. M. Zheng, K. Zhao, and A. Stylianou. 2010. Building social capital in online communities: A perspective of information and system quality. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS'10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. H. Zhu, R. Kraut, and A. Kittur. 2012a. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  180. H. Zhu, R. Kraut, and A. Kittur. 2012b. Organizing without formal organization: Group identification, goal setting and social modeling in directing online production. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  181. P. Ziaie and M. Imamovic. 2013. Lifecycle-based evolution of features in collaborative production communities: The case of wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. P. Ziaie and H. Krcmar. 2012. Introducing a design framework for reputation systems in multi-tier production communities. Digital Creativity, Special Issue on Collaboration and Community 23, 2, 144--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  183. P. Ziaie and H. Krcmar. 2013a. Content in open production communities: Taxonomy and construct. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT'13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. P. Ziaie and H. Krcmar. 2013b. Introducing a design-oriented categorization of online voluntary production communities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH'13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. P. Ziaie and H. Krcmar. 2014. Designing target-oriented incentive systems for online production communities. In Proceedings of Die Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI'14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Model for Context in the Design of Open Production Communities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Computing Surveys
        ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 47, Issue 2
        January 2015
        827 pages
        ISSN:0360-0300
        EISSN:1557-7341
        DOI:10.1145/2658850
        • Editor:
        • Sartaj Sahni
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 November 2014
        • Revised: 1 August 2014
        • Accepted: 1 August 2014
        • Received: 1 August 2013
        Published in csur Volume 47, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader