skip to main content
10.1145/2663716.2663741acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Challenges in Inferring Internet Interdomain Congestion

Published:05 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce and demonstrate the utility of a method to localize and quantify inter-domain congestion in the Internet. Our Time Sequence Latency Probes (TSLP) method depends on two facts: Internet traffic patterns are typically diurnal, and queues increase packet delay through a router during periods of adjacent link congestion. Repeated round trip delay measurements from a single test point to the two edges of a congested link will show sustained increased latency to the far (but not to the near) side of the link, a delay pattern that differs from the typical diurnal pattern of an uncongested link. We describe our technique and its surprising potential,carefully analyze the biggest challenge with the methodology (interdomain router-level topology inference), describe other less severe challenges, and present initial results that are sufficiently promising to motivate further attention to overcoming the challenges.

References

  1. R. Andrews and S. Higginbotham. YouTube sucks on French ISP Free, and French regulators want to know why. GigaOm, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Bauer, D. Clark, and W. Lehr. Understanding Broadband Speed Measurements. In TPRC, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Brodkin. Time Warner, net neutrality foes cry foul over Netflix Super HD demands, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Brodkin. Why YouTube buffers: The secret deals that make-and break-online video. Ars Technica, July 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Buckley. Cogent and Orange France fight over interconnection issues. Fierce Telecom, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Buckley. France Telecom and Google entangled in peering fight. Fierce Telecom, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. L. Calvert, W. K. Edwards, N. Feamster, R. E. Grinter, Y. Deng, and X. Zhou. Instrumenting home networks. ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 41(1), Jan. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Chen, D. R. Choffnes, R. Potharaju, Y. Chen, F. E. Bustamante, D. Pei, and Y. Zhao. Where the sidewalk ends: Extending the Internet AS graph using traceroutes from P2P users. In ACM CoNEXT, Dec. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Chen, S. Jain, V. K. Adhikari, and Z.-L. Zhang. Characterizing roles of front-end servers in end-to-end performance of dynamic content distribution. In ACM SIGCOMM IMC, Nov. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Cowley. ISP spat blacks out Net connections. InfoWorld, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. DiCioccio, R. Teixeira, M. May, and C. Kreibich. Probe and Pray: Using UPnP for Home Network Measurements. In PAM, pages 96--105, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Dischinger, A. Haeberlen, K. P. Gummadi, and S. Saroiu. Characterizing residential broadband networks. In ACM SIGCOMM IMC, Oct. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Engebretson. Level 3/Comcast dispute revives eyeball vs. content debate, Nov. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Engebretson. Behind the Level 3-Comcast peering settlement, July 2013. http://www.telecompetitor.com/behind-the-level-3-comcast-peering-settlement/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Faratin, D. Clark, S. Bauer, W. Lehr, P. Gilmore, and A. Berger. The growing complexity of Internet interconnection. Communications and Strategies, (72):51--71, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. FCC. Measuring Broadband America, 2011. http://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Floyd and V. Jacobson. Random early detection (RED) gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(4):397--413, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Genin and J. Splett. Where in the Internet is congestion?, 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3696.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B. Huffaker, A. Dhamdhere, M. Fomenkov, and kc claffy. Toward topology dualism: Improving the accuracy of AS annotations for routers. In PAM, Apr. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Hyun, B. Huffaker, D. Andersen, M. Luckie, and K. C. Claffy. The IPv4 Routed /24 Topology Dataset, 2014. http://www.caida.org/data/active/ipv4_routed_24_topology_dataset.xml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Jain and C. Dovrolis. End-to-end available bandwidth: Measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(4):537--549, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. E. Katz-Bassett, H. V. Madhyastha, V. K. Adhikari, C. Scott, J. Sherry, P. vas Wesep, T. Anderson, and A. Krishnamurthy. Reverse traceroute. In USENIX NSDI, Apr. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Netalyzr: Illuminating the Edge Network. In ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Liu and M. Crovella. Using loss pairs to discover network properties. In ACM SIGCOMM IMW, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Luckie, B. Huffaker, A. Dhamdhere, V. Giotsas, and k claffy. AS relationships, customer cones, and validation. In ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Luckie and kc claffy. A second look at detecting third-party addresses in traceroute traces with the IP timestamp option. In PAM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R. Mahajan, N. Spring, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. User-level Internet path diagnosis. In ACM SOSP, Oct. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A. A. Mahimkar, H. H. Song, Z. Ge, A. Shaikh, J. Wang, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, and J. Emmons. Detecting the performance impact of upgrades in large operational networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Z. M. Mao, D. Johnson, J. Rexford, J. Wang, and R. Katz. Scalable and accurate identification of AS-Level forwarding paths. In IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M. Mathis. Model Based Bulk Performance Metrics. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics/, Oct 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Nichols and V. Jacobson. Controlling queue delay. ACM Queue, 10(5), May 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Ricknas. Sprint-Cogent dispute puts small rip in fabric of Internet. PCWorld, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. J. Sherry, E. Katz-Bassett, M. Pimenova, H. V. Madhyastha, T. Anderson, and A. Krishnamurthy. Resolving IP aliases with prespecified timestamps. In ACM SIGCOMM IMC, Nov. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. S. Sundaresan, W. de Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford, and A. Pescapè. Broadband Internet performance: A view from the gateway. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. M. Taylor. Observations of an Internet Middleman, May 2014. http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. W. A. Taylor. Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes, 2000. http://www.variation.com/cpa/tech/changepoint.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Verizon. Unbalanced peering, and the real story behind the Verizon/Cogent dispute, June 2013. http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. B. Zhang, J. Bi, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Wu. Refining IP-to-AS mappings for AS-level traceroute. In IEEE ICCCN, July 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Y. Zhang, R. Oliveira, H. Zhang, and L. Zhang. Quantifying the pitfalls of traceroute in AS connectivity inference. In PAM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Challenges in Inferring Internet Interdomain Congestion

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IMC '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference
          November 2014
          524 pages
          ISBN:9781450332132
          DOI:10.1145/2663716

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 November 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          IMC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of103submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          IMC '24
          ACM Internet Measurement Conference
          November 4 - 6, 2024
          Madrid , AA , Spain

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader