skip to main content
10.1145/2677972.2677994acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the augmented home window: user perceptions of the concept

Published:25 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the future, transparent displays can be utilized as information and communication channels in our everyday environments. Home windows form an interesting, yet unexplored platform, which could be utilized in the future e.g. as a mixed reality display or a personal or family communication channel. We explored the early user perceptions of an augmented home window through two user studies. In the first study 21 participants from 12 households commented our concept ideas and created their own. In the second study (12 households, 12 participants), developed concept ideas were assessed in a diary and a user study based on probes. The probes were used as experiential probes to gather perceptions of an augmented home window concept. Based on the studies, we present four communication modes for the augmented home window. The detailed findings reveal that contextual relevance of the content is highly important in the augmented home window, and that pragmatic use cases were valued, whereas social features were less appreciated.

References

  1. Corning concept video "A Day Made of Glass" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38 last accessed on June 30 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Davidoff, S. Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K., and Zimmerman, J. 2007. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Ubiquitous Computing (Innsbruck, Austria. 16--19 September 2007) UbiComp'07. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 429--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Yiu, C., Zimmerman, J., and Dey, A. K. 2006. Principles of Smart Home Control. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Ubiquitous Computing (Orange County, CA, USA. 17-21 September 2006) Ubicomp'06, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 19--34. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1007/11853565_2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. de Sá, M. and Churchill, E. 2012. Mobile augmented reality: exploring design and prototyping techniques. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (San Francisco, CA, USA, September 21-24, 2012). MobileHCI'12. ACM, 221--230. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2371574.2371608 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dünser, A., Grasset, R., and Billinghurst, M. A 2008. survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2008, ACM. Article No. 5. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1508044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Durrant, A., Taylor, A. S., Frohlich, D., Sellen, A., and Uzzell, D. 2009. Photo displays and intergenerational relationships in the family home. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers.. BCS-HCI '09, 2009, British Computer Society Swinton, UK, 10--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Cultural Probes. Interactions, Vol VI, No. 1 January+February (1999), 21--29 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jääskö, V., and Mattelmäki, T. 2003. Observing and probing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 23--26, 2003) DPPI 2003, ACM. 126--131. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/782896.782927. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kawsar, F., and Bernheim Brush, A. J. 2013. Home Computing Unplugged: Why, Where and When People Use Different Connected Devices at Home. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. (Zurich, Switzerland. 8--12 September 2013) Ubicomp'13. ACM. 627--636. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2493432.2493494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lee, J., Olwal, A., Ishii, H., and Boulanger, C. 2013. SpaceTop: integrating 2D and spatial 3D interactions in a see-through desktop environment. In Proceedings of CHI'13. ACM. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2470680 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. LiveMap concept. http://www.3ders.org/articles/20130618-livemap-augmented-reality-helmet-with-navigation-on-indiegogo. htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Milgram, P., and Kishino, F. A 1994. Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems, vol. E77-D, no. 12, 1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mynatt, E. D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., and Jacobs, A. 2001. Digital family portraits: Providing peace of mind for extended family members. In Proceedings of CHI '01. ACM. 333--340. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/365024.365126 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nettamo, E., Nirhamo, M., and Häkkilä, J. 2006. A Cross-Cultural Study of Mobile Music -- Retrieval, Management and Consumption. In Proceedings of OZCHI 2006, ACM. 87--94. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1228175.1228193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nylander, S., Fådal, J., Mottaghy, S. 2012. Couch mobility: the cell phone's most important feature at home is mobility. In CHI Extended Abstracts 2012, 1973--1978. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2212776.2223738 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Olsson, T., Lagerstam, E., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2011. Expected User Experience of Mobile Augmented Reality Services: A User Study in the Context of Shopping Centers. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, (2011). Springer-Verlag 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Olwal, A., Lindfors, C., Gustafsson, J., Kjellberg, T., and Mattson, L. 2005. ASTOR: An Autostereoscopic Optical See-through Augmented Reality System. In Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. (Vienna, Austria, 5--8 October 2005) ISMAR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA 24--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peetrs, M., Megens, C., Hummels, C., and Brombacher, A. 2013. Experiental Probes: probing for emerging behavior patterns in everyday life. In Proceedings of 5th IASDR 2013, 2879--2888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodenstein, R. 1999. Employing the periphery: the window as interface. In CHI EA'99, ACM. 204--205. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/632716.632844 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Samsung NL22B Transparent Display http://www.samsung.com/za/business/business-products/large-format-display/specialized-display/LH22NLBVLVC/XY. Last accessed on March 04 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Saslis-Lagoudakis, G., Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., and Rouncefield, M. 2006. Hermes@Home: Supporting Awareness and Intimacy between Distant Family Members. In Proceedings of OzCHI 2006, ACM. 23--30. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1228175.1228183 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Steimle, J., Benko, H., Cassinelli, A., Ishii, H., Leithinger, D., Maes, P., and Poupyrev, I. 2013. Displays take new shape: an agenda for future interactive surfaces. In CHI EA'13, ACM 3283--3286. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2468356.2479667 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tönnis, M., Sandor, C., Lange, C., and Bubb, H. 2005. Experimental Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Visualization for Directing a Car Driver's Attention. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. ISMAR 2005, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, US 2005. 56--59. DOI= 10.1109/ISMAR.2005.31 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Truong, K. N., Huang, E. M., Stevens, M. M., and Abowd, G. D. 2004. How Do Users Think about Ubiquitous Computing? In. CHI EA '04, ACM. 1317--1320. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986053 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ventä-Olkkonen, L., Posti, M., Koskenranta, O., and Häkkilä, J. 2012. User Expectations of Mobile Mixed Reality Service Content. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. (Ulm, Germany. 03--06 December 2012) MUM 2012. ACM, Article No. 52. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2406367.2406430 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Weiser, M. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 265 (3), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wouters, N., Huyghe, J., and Vande Moere, A. 2013. OpenWindow: citizen-controlled content on public displays. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Mountain View, CA, USA 4-5 June 2013) PerDis'13 ACM. 121--126. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2491568.2491595 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of CHI'07, ACM, 493--502. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the augmented home window: user perceptions of the concept

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '14: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      November 2014
      275 pages
      ISBN:9781450333047
      DOI:10.1145/2677972

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader