ABSTRACT
Recent disasters have shown an increase in the significance of social media for both affected citizens and volunteers alike in the coordination of information and organization of relief activities, often independently of and in addition to the official emergency response. Existing research mainly focuses on the way in which individual platforms are used by volunteers in response to disasters. This paper examines the use of social media during the European Floods of 2013 and proposes a novel cross-social-media application for volunteers. Besides comprehensive analysis of volunteer communities, interviews were conducted with "digital volunteers" such as Facebook moderators of disaster-related groups. Based on the challenges identified, we designed and implemented the cross-social-media application "XHELP", which allows information to be both, acquired and distributed cross-media and cross-channel. The evaluation with 20 users leads to further design requirements for applications aiming to support volunteer moderators during disasters.
- Birkbak, A. Crystallizations in the Blizzard: Contrasting Informal Emergency Collaboration In Facebook Groups. Proc. NordiCHI (2012), 428--437. Google ScholarDigital Library
- BITKOM. Soziale Netzwerke 2013 - Eine repräsentative Untersuchung zur Nutzung sozialer Netzwerke im Internet. Berlin, 2013.Google Scholar
- http://www.brandwatch.com/brandwatch-analyticsGoogle Scholar
- Chen, C., Carolina, N., and Ractham, P. Lessons Learned from the Use of Social Media in Combating a Crisis: A Case Study of 2011 Thailand Flooding Disaster. Proc. ICIS (2012), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Cobb, C., McCarthy, T., Perkins, A., and Bharadwaj, A. Designing for the Deluge: Understanding & Supporting the Distributed, Collaborative Work of Crisis Volunteers. Proc. CSCW (2014), 888--899. Google ScholarDigital Library
- St. Denis, L., Anderson, K.M., and Palen, L. Mastering Social Media: An Analysis of Jefferson County's Communications during the 2013 Colorado Floods. Proc. ISCRAM (2014), 737--746.Google Scholar
- St. Denis, L., Hughes, A., and Palen, L. Trial by Fire: The Deployment of Trusted Digital Volunteers in the 2011 Shadow Lake Fire. Proc. ISCRAM (2012), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Dörk, M., Gruen, D., Williamson, C., and Carpendale, S. A Visual backchannel for large-scale events. IEEE TVCG 16, 6 (2010), 1129--1138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dou, W., Yu, L., Wang, X., Ma, Z., and Ribarsky, W. HierarchicalTopics: Visually exploring large text collections using topic hierarchies. IEEE TVCG 19, 12 (2013), 2002--2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fuchs, G., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Bothe, S., and Stange, H. Tracing the German Centennial Flood in the Stream of Tweets: First Lessons Learned. SIGSPATIAL GeoCrowd (2013), 2--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gao, H., Barbier, G., and Goolsby, R. Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26, 3 (2011), 10--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://geofeedia.com/how-it-worksGoogle Scholar
- Heverin, T. and Zach, L. Microblogging for Crisis Communication: Examination of Twitter Use in Response to a 2009 Violent Crisis in the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington Area. Proc. ISCRAM (2010), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, M., Betke, H., and Sackmann, S. Hands2Help -- Ein App-basiertes Konzept zur Koordination Freiwilliger Helfer. i-com 13, 1 (2014), 29--36.Google Scholar
- https://hootsuite.com/products/platformGoogle Scholar
- Hughes, A., Denis, L.A.S., Palen, L., and Anderson, K.M. Online Public Communications by Police & Fire Services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. Proc. CHI (2014), 1505--1514. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53, 1 (2010), 59--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kaufhold, M.-A. and Reuter, C. Vernetzte Selbsthilfe in Sozialen Medien am Beispiel des Hochwassers 2013 / Linked Self-Help in Social Media using the example of the Floods 2013 in Germany. i-com 13, 1 (2014), 20--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ludwig, T., Reuter, C., Siebigteroth, T., and Pipek, V. CrowdMonitor: Mobile Crowd Sensing for Assessing Physical and Digital Activities of Citizens during Emergencies. Proc. CHI (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus, A., Bernstein, M., and Badar, O. Twitinfo: aggregating and visualizing microblogs for event exploration. Proc. CHI (2011), 227--236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McClendon, S. and Robinson, A.C. Leveraging Geospatially-Oriented Social Media Communications in Disaster Response. Proc. ISCRAM (2012), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oh, O., Agrawal, M., and Rao, H.R. Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Rumor Theoretic Analysis of Tweets during Social Crises. MISQ 37, 2 (2013), 407--426. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Okolloh, O. Ushahidi, or "testimony": Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action 59, 1 (2009), 65--70.Google Scholar
- Perng, S.-Y., Büscher, M., Wood, L., et al. Peripheral response: Microblogging during the 22/7/2011 Norway attacks. Proc. ISCRAM (2012), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Pohl, D. Social Media Analysis for Crisis Management: A Brief Survey. Special Technical Community on Social Networking. IEEE STCSN E-Letter 2, 1 (2013).Google Scholar
- Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P., and Zhang, J. Microblogging after a Major Disaster in China: A Case Study of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. Proc. CSCW (2011), 25--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quarantelli, E.L. Emergent Citizen Groups in Disaster Preparedness and Recovery Activities. 1984.Google Scholar
- Reilly, W.S.N., Guarino, S.L., and Kellihan, B. ModelBased Measurement of Situation Awareness. Proc. WSC (2007), 1353--1360. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reuter, C., Heger, O., and Pipek, V. Combining Real and Virtual Volunteers through Social Media. Proc. ISCRAM (2013), 780--790.Google Scholar
- Reuter, C., Marx, A., and Pipek, V. Crisis Management 2.0: Towards a Systematization of Social Software Use in Crisis Situations. IIJISCRAM 4, 1 (2012), 1--16.Google Scholar
- Reuter, C., Ritzkatis, M., and Ludwig, T. Entwicklung eines SOA-basierten und anpassbaren Bewertungsdienstes für Inhalte aus sozialen Medien. Informatik 2014 (LNI) (2014), 977--988.Google Scholar
- Reuter, C. Emergent Collaboration Infrastructures: Technology Design for Inter-Organizational Crisis Management (Ph.D. Thesis). Springer Gabler, Siegen, Germany, 2014.Google Scholar
- Robinson, A., Savelyev, A., Pezanowski, S., and MacEachren, A.M. Understanding the Utility of Geospatial Information in Social Media. Proc. ISCRAM (2013).Google Scholar
- http://sproutsocial.com/featuresGoogle Scholar
- Stallings, R.A. and Quarantelli, E.L. Emergent Citizen Groups and Emergency Management. Public Administration Review 45, Special Issue (1985), 93--100.Google Scholar
- Starbird, K. and Palen, L. Voluntweeters: SelfOrganizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. In Proc. CHI. Vancouver, Canada (2011), 1071--1080. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Starbird, K. and Palen, L. (How) Will the Revolution be Retweeted? Information Diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian Uprising. Proc. CSCW (2012), 7--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Starbird, K. and Stamberger, J. Tweak the Tweet: Leveraging Microblogging Proliferation with a Prescriptive Syntax to Support Citizen Reporting. Proc. ISCRAM (2010), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Terpstra, T., Vries, A. de, Stronkman, R., and Paradies, G.L. Towards a realtime Twitter analysis during crises for operational crisis management. Proc. ISCRAM (2012).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Twidale, M., Randall, D., and Bentley, R. Situated evaluation for cooperative systems Situated evaluation for cooperative systems. Lancester, United Kingdom, 1994.Google Scholar
- https://about.twitter.com/products/tweetdeckGoogle Scholar
- http://www.ubermetrics-technologies.com/en/productGoogle Scholar
- Valecha, R., Oh, O., and Rao, R. An Exploration of Collaboration over Time in Collective Crisis Response during the Haiti 2010 Earthquake. Proc. ICIS (2013), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., and Palen, L. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. Proc. CHI (2010), 1079--1088. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vieweg, S., Palen, L., Liu, S.B., Hughes, A., and Sutton, J. Collective Intelligence in Distaster: Examination of the Phenomenon in the Aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech Shooting. Proc. ISCRAM (2008), 44--54.Google Scholar
- White, C., Plotnick, L., Kushma, J., Hiltz, S.R., and Turoff, M. An online social network for emergency management. IJEM 6, 3/4 (2009), 369--382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., and Stevens, G. Engaging with Practices: Design Case Studies as a Research Framework in CSCW. Proc. CSCW (2011), 505--512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yates, D. and Paquette, S. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. IJIM 31, 1 (2011), 6--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- XHELP: Design of a Cross-Platform Social-Media Application to Support Volunteer Moderators in Disasters
Recommendations
CrowdMonitor: Mobile Crowd Sensing for Assessing Physical and Digital Activities of Citizens during Emergencies
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEmergencies such as the 2013 Central European flood or the 2013 typhoon Haiyan in Philippines have shown how citizens can organize themselves and coordinate private relief activities. These activities can be found in (physical) groups of affected people,...
Social Haystack: Dynamic Quality Assessment of Citizen-Generated Content during Emergencies
People all over the world are regularly affected by disasters and emergencies. Besides official emergency services, ordinary citizens are getting increasingly involved in crisis response work. They are usually present on-site at the place of incident ...
Brainstorming for Japan: rapid distributed global collaboration for disaster response
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTragic events struck northern Japan in March-April 2011. This note presents a case study of rapid distributed brainstorming for disaster response, involving 275 contributors from 23 countries within a three-day period, conducted among the staff in a ...
Comments