skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702255acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is a widespread belief that pervasive technologies will encourage and facilitate partnerships between citizens and civic authorities, enabling individuals to play a greater role in civic planning, service delivery and infrastructure management. However, at present sustained use and perceived value of civic engagement technologies remains low because the design space is poorly understood by system developers who focus almost exclusively on empowering citizens rather than adopting an informed, inclusive approach that addresses the needs of both citizens and civic authorities, and helps establish trusted relationships between these different stakeholders. We report on an extensive study of civic engagement in the domain of public infrastructure maintenance and provide insights into the civic management processes to support future design of trusted civic engagement interactions.

References

  1. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. James Surowiecki, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akamavi, N., and Kimble, C. Knowledge sharing and computer supported collaborative work: the role of organisational culture and trust. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the United Kingdom Academy of Information Systems, Citeseer (2005), 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alliance, A. I. Annual local authority road maintenance (alarm) survey 2014. http://www.asphaltindustryalliance.com/images/ library/files/ALARM_Survey_2014.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amazon. Amazon mechanical turk website. https://www.mturk.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Aoki, P. M., Honicky, R. J., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Paulos, E., Subramanian, S., and Woodruff, A. A vehicle for research: Using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Association, A. P. Nyc 311 - issue reporting mobile application. http://www1.nyc.gov/connect/applications.page. Accessed: 2014-07--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Baier, A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96, 2 (1986), 231--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. El Husseini, A., M'hamed, A., El Hassan, B., and Mokhtari, M. Trust-based authentication scheme with user rating for low-resource devices in smart environments. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 5 (June 2013), 1013--1023. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. for an Urban Future, C. Caution ahead: Overdue nvestments for new york's aging infrastructure. http://nhtsurvey2013.econtrack.co.uk, March 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonçalves, J., Kostakos, V., Karapanos, E., Barreto, M., Camacho, T., Tomasic, A., and Zimmerman, J. Citizen motivation on the go: The role of psychological empowerment. Interacting with Computers (2013), iwt035.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Group, N. S. S. National highways public satisfaction survey. http://nhtsurvey2013.econtrack.co.uk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Grudin, J. Why cscw applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, ACM (1988). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kazemi, L., Shahabi, C., and Chen, L. Geotrucrowd: Trustworthy query answering with spatial crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, SIGSPATIAL'13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 314--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Knowles, B., Harding, M., Blair, L., Davies, N., Hannon, J., Rouncefield, M., and Walden, J. Trustworthy by design. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 1060--1071. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Olphert, C. W., and Damodaran, L. Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ict design and delivery. J. AIS 8, 9 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. openPlans Organisation. Open311 civic issue tracking specification. http://open311.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. openSociety. Fix my street website. http://www.fixmystreet.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Org., N. Neat streets website. www.neatstreets.com.au.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker, S., Spires, P., Farook, F., and Mean, M. State of Trust - How to Build Better Relationships Between Councils and the Public. Demos, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Patrick, A., Marsh, S., Briggs, P., et al. Designing systems that people will trust.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Thatcher, J. B., Carter, M., Li, X., and Rong, G. A classification and investigation of trustees in b-to-c e-commerce: General vs. specific trust. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 32 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsampoulatidis, I., Ververidis, D., Tsarchopoulos, P., Nikolopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, I., and Komninos, N. Improvemycity: An open source platform for direct citizen-government communication. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 839--842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C., and An, B. A reputation-aware decision-making approach for improving the efficiency of crowdsourcing systems. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS '13 (Richland, SC, 2013), 1315--1316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader