skip to main content
10.1145/2714576.2714619acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vehicular Platooning in an Adversarial Environment

Published:14 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we show that a single, maliciously controlled vehicle can destabilize a vehicular platoon, to catastrophic effect, through local modifications to the prevailing control law. Specifically, by combining changes to the gains of the associated law with the appropriate vehicle movements, the attacker can cause the platoon to oscillate at a resonant frequency, causing accidents that could result in serious injury or death. We determine the range of gains, and their corresponding frequencies, that allow an attacker to violate the string stability and stability criteria at different positions in the platoon. Furthermore, we prove that the attack can be successful at any position in the platoon and at frequencies that can be realized by the other vehicles in the platoon. Our work implies that neither the string stability nor stability conditions, when used singly, ensure proper platoon operation, and that neither can be used to ensure the other. Finally, we show that an attacker is theoretically capable of gaining control over the individual position and velocity (states) of other vehicles in the platoon; two attacks are demonstrated for this vulnerability.

References

  1. C. Barreto, A. A. Cárdenas, and N. Quijano. Controllability of dynamical systems: Threat models and reactive security. In S. Das, C. Nita-Rotaru, and M. Kantarcioglu, editors, Decision and Game Theory for Security, volume 8252 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 45--64. Springer International Publishing, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. D. Baskar, B. De Schutter, J. Hellendoorn, and Z. Papp. Traffic control and intelligent vehicle highway systems: a survey. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 5(1):38--52, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Bergenhem, S. Shladover, E. Coelingh, C. Englund, and S. Tsugawa. Overview of platooning systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Oct 22-26, Vienna, Austria (2012), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Carbaugh, D. N. Godbole, and R. Sengupta. Safety and capacity analysis of automated and manual highway systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(1):69--99, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Cardenas, S. Amin, B. Sinopoli, A. Giani, A. Perrig, and S. Sastry. Challenges for securing cyber physical systems. In Workshop on future directions in cyber-physical systems security, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C.-T. Chen. Linear system theory and design. Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Coelingh and S. Solyom. All aboard the robotic road train. IEEE Spectrum, November 2012. {Online; accessed 30-Sept-2013}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Cook. Conditions for string stability. Systems & Control Letters, 54(10):991--998, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Dadras, R. M. Gerdes, and R. Sharma. Transfer functions for string instability. Technical report, http://www.eng.usu.edu/ece/faculty/rgerdes/papers/tech/transferSI.pdf, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Darbha and K. Rajagopal. Intelligent cruise control systems and traffic flow stability. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(6):329--352, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Davila, E. del Pozo, E. Aramburu, and A. Freixas. Environmental benefits of vehicle platooning. Human Factors, 2012:05--17, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. W. Dunbar and D. Caveney. Distributed receding horizon control of vehicle platoons: Stability and string stability. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 57(3):620--633, March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Featherstone and M. Lowson. Viability and benefits of platooning in automated transport systems. http://www.cybercars.org/docs/CTF%20Lowson%20Report.pdf, 2004. {Technical report; online; accessed 04-June-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Ferrara and C. Vecchio. Sliding mode control for automatic driving of a platoon of vehicles. In Variable Structure Systems, 2006. VSS'06. International Workshop on, pages 262--267, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. M. Gerdes, C. Winstead, and K. Heaslip. Cps: An efficiency-motivated attack against autonomous vehicular transportation. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC '13, pages 99--108, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. J. Haas. The effects of wireless jamming on vehicle platooning. https://wiki.engr.illinois.edu/download/attachments/19826169/jjhaas2_platoon_jamming.pdf, 2009. {Tech report; online; accessed 04-June-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. HDT Truckinginfo. Project to test 'platooning' trucks. http://www.truckinginfo.com/channel/fuel-smarts/news/story/2013/10/project-to-test-platooning-trucks.aspx, 2013. {Online; accessed04-June-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Ioannou. Automated Highway Systems. Springer, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Isidori. Nonlinear Control Systems. Number v.1 in Communications and Control Engineering. Springer, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. Kavathekar and Y. Chen. Draft: Vehicle platooning: A brief survey and categorization. In Proceedings of The ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, volume 2011, pages 829--845. ASME, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Khodayari, A. Ghaffari, S. Ameli, and J. Flahatgar. A historical review on lateral and longitudinal control of autonomous vehicle motions. In Mechanical and Electrical Technology (ICMET), 2010 2nd International Conference on, pages 421--429, Sept 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. X. Litrico. Robust imc flow control of simo dam-river open-channel systems. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 10(3):432--437, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. X. Litrico and J. Pomet. Nonlinear modelling and control of a long river stretch. In European Control Conference, Cambridge, UK, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. X.-Y. Lu, S. E. Shladover, and C. Nowakowski. Partial automation for truck platooning. http://www.automatedvehiclessymposium.org/callforposters/partial-automation, 2014. {Poster presented at TRB Automated Vehicle Symposium 2014; accessed 04-June-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. Mo and B. Sinopoli. Integrity attacks on cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on High Confidence Networked Systems, HiCoNS '12, pages 47--54, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. F. Pasqualetti, A. Bicchi, and F. Bullo. Consensus computation in unreliable networks: A system theoretic approach. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 57(1):90--104, Jan 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. F. Pasqualetti, F. Dorfler, and F. Bullo. Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 58(11):2715--2729, Nov 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. E. Shaw and J. Hedrick. Controller design for string stable heterogeneous vehicle strings. In Decision and Control, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on, pages 2868--2875, Dec 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. E. Shaw and J. Hedrick. String stability analysis for heterogeneous vehicle strings. In American Control Conference, 2007. ACC '07, pages 3118--3125, July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. S. Shladover. Path at 20 - history and major milestones. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 8(4):584--592, Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Shladover. Recent international activity in cooperative vehicle-highway automation systems. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/advancedresearch/pubs/12033/index.cfm, 2012. {U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-HRT-12-033; Online; accessed 04-June-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Wang and R. Rajamani. Should adaptive cruise-control systems be designed to maintain a constant time gap between vehicles? Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 53(5):1480--1490, Sept 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. D. Yanakiev and I. Kanellakopoulos. A simplified framework for string stability analysis in ahs. In In the Proceedings of the 13th IFAC World Congress, pages 177--182, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Vehicular Platooning in an Adversarial Environment

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                ASIA CCS '15: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security
                April 2015
                698 pages
                ISBN:9781450332453
                DOI:10.1145/2714576

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 14 April 2015

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                ASIA CCS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate48of269submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate418of2,322submissions,18%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader