skip to main content
10.1145/2749469.2750387acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BEAR: techniques for mitigating bandwidth bloat in gigascale DRAM caches

Published:13 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Die stacking memory technology can enable gigascale DRAM caches that can operate at 4x-8x higher bandwidth than commodity DRAM. Such caches can improve system performance by servicing data at a faster rate when the requested data is found in the cache, potentially increasing the memory bandwidth of the system by 4x-8x. Unfortunately, a DRAM cache uses the available memory bandwidth not only for data transfer on cache hits, but also for other secondary operations such as cache miss detection, fill on cache miss, and writeback lookup and content update on dirty evictions from the last-level on-chip cache. Ideally, we want the bandwidth consumed for such secondary operations to be negligible, and have almost all the bandwidth be available for transfer of useful data from the DRAM cache to the processor.

We evaluate a 1GB DRAM cache, architected as Alloy Cache, and show that even the most bandwidth-efficient proposal for DRAM cache consumes 3.8x bandwidth compared to an idealized DRAM cache that does not consume any bandwidth for secondary operations. We also show that redesigning the DRAM cache to minimize the bandwidth consumed by secondary operations can potentially improve system performance by 22%. To that end, this paper proposes Bandwidth Efficient ARchitecture (BEAR) for DRAM caches. BEAR integrates three components, one each for reducing the bandwidth consumed by miss detection, miss fill, and writeback probes. BEAR reduces the bandwidth consumption of DRAM cache by 32%, which reduces cache hit latency by 24% and increases overall system performance by 10%. BEAR, with negligible overhead, outperforms an idealized SRAM Tag-Store design that incurs an unacceptable overhead of 64 megabytes, as well as Sector Cache designs that incur an SRAM storage overhead of 6 megabytes.

References

  1. HMC Specification 1.0, 2013. {Online}. Available: http://www.hybridmemorycube.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. JEDEC, High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) DRAM (JESD235), JEDEC, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Micron, HMC Gen2, Micron, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 1Gb_DDR3_SDRAM.pdf - Rev. I 02/10 EN, Micron, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DDR4 SPEC (JESD79-4), JEDEC, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. H. Loh and M. D. Hill, "Efficiently enabling conventional block sizes for very large die-stacked dram caches," in Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. H. Loh, N. Jayasena, J. Chung, S. K. Reinhardt, J. M. O'Connor, and K. McGrath, "Challenges in heterogeneous die-stacked and off-chip memory systems," in 3rd Workshop on SoCs, Heterogeneous Architectures and Workloads, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Sim, G. H. Loh, H. Kim, M. O'Connor, and M. Thottethodi, "A mostly-clean dram cache for effective hit speculation and self-balancing dispatch," in Proceedings of the 2012 45th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. K. Qureshi and G. H. Loh, "Fundamental latency trade-off in architecting dram caches: Outperforming impractical sram-tags with a simple and practical design," in Proceedings of the 2012 45th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Jevdjic, S. Volos, and B. Falsafi, "Die-stacked dram caches for servers: Hit ratio, latency, or bandwidth? have it all with footprint cache," in Proceedings of the 40th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C.-C. Huang and V. Nagarajan, "Atcache: Reducing dram cache latency via a small sram tag cache," in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. B. Rothman and A. J. Smith, "Sector cache design and performance," in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. K. Qureshi, A. Jaleel, Y. N. Patt, S. C. Steely, and J. Emer, "Adaptive insertion policies for high performance caching," in Proceedings of the 34th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Jaleel, K. B. Theobald, S. C. Steely Jr., and J. Emer, "High performance cache replacement using re-reference interval prediction (rrip)," in Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. Chatterjee, R. Balasubramonian, M. Shevgoor, S. H. Pugsley, A. N. Udipi, A. Shafiee, K. Sudan, and M. Awasthi, USIMM, University of Utah, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Perelman, G. Hamerly, M. Van Biesbrouck, T. Sherwood, and B. Calder, "Using simpoint for accurate and efficient simulation," in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Jaleel, E. Borch, M. Bhandaru, S. C. Steely Jr., and J. Emer, "Achieving non-inclusive cache performance with inclusive caches: Temporal locality aware (tla) cache management policies," in Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Kharbutli and Y. Solihin, "Counter-based cache replacement and bypassing algorithms," IEEE Trans. Comput., Apr. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A.-C. Lai, C. Fide, and B. Falsafi, "Dead-block prediction & dead-block correlating prefetchers," in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. M. Khan, Y. Tian, and D. A. Jimenez, "Sampling dead block prediction for last-level caches," in Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. V. Seshadri, O. Mutlu, M. A. Kozuch, and T. C. Mowry, "The evicted-address filter: A unified mechanism to address both cache pollution and thrashing," in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. AMD Phenom II. {Online}. Available: http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/phenom-iiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. "Intel core i7-3940xm processor specification." {Online}. Available: http://ark.intel.com/products/71096/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C.-J. Wu, A. Jaleel, W. Hasenplaugh, M. Martonosi, S. C. Steely, Jr., and J. Emer, "Ship: Signature-based hit predictor for high performance caching," in Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. A. Jiménez, "Insertion and promotion for tree-based pseudolru last-level caches," in Proceedings of the 46th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. K. Qureshi and Y. N. Patt, "Utility-based cache partitioning: A low-overhead, high-performance, runtime mechanism to partition shared caches," in Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. Tyson, M. Farrens, J. Matthews, and A. R. Pleszkun, "A modified approach to data cache management," in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. M. Khan, A. R. Alameldeen, C. Wilkerson, O. Mutlu, and D. A. Jiménez, "Improving cache performance using read-write partitioning," in High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), 2014 IEEE 20th International Symposium on., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Z. Zhang, Z. Zhu, and X. Zhang, "Design and optimization of large size and low overhead off-chip caches," IEEE Trans. Comput., Jul. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. BEAR: techniques for mitigating bandwidth bloat in gigascale DRAM caches

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISCA '15: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture
        June 2015
        768 pages
        ISBN:9781450334020
        DOI:10.1145/2749469

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate543of3,203submissions,17%

        Upcoming Conference

        ISCA '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader