skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2804271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MagnifiSense: inferring device interaction using wrist-worn passive magneto-inductive sensors

Published:07 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The different electronic devices we use on a daily basis produce distinct electromagnetic radiation due to differences in their underlying electrical components. We present MagnifiSense, a low-power wearable system that uses three passive magneto-inductive sensors and a minimal ADC setup to identify the device a person is operating. MagnifiSense achieves this by analyzing near-field electromagnetic radiation from common components such as the motors, rectifiers, and modulators. We conducted a staged, in-the-wild evaluation where an instrumented participant used a set of devices in a variety of settings in the home such as cooking and outdoors such as commuting in a vehicle. MagnifiSense achieves a classification accuracy of 82.6% using a model-agnostic classifier and 94.0% using a model-specific classifier. In a 24-hour naturalistic deployment, MagnifiSense correctly identified 25 of the total 29 events, while achieving a low false positive rate of 0.65% during 20.5 hours of non-activity.

References

  1. Arrillaga, J. and Watson, N. R. 2003. Power System Harmonics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao, L. and Intille, S. 2004. Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Accleration Data. In Proc. Pervasive Computing '04. (2004), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Breiman, L. 1999. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 45, (1999), 1--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, K., Gupta, S., Larson, E. and Patel, S. 2015. DOSE: Detecting User-Driven Operating States of Electronic Devices from a Single Sensing PointNo Title. IEEE Conference of Pervasive Computing (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fishkin, K. P., Fox, D., Kautz, H., Patterson, D., Perkowitz, M. and Philipose, M. 2003. Guide: towards understanding daily life via autoidentification and statistical analysis. Proc. of Ubihealth '03 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. FreeLinc FreeLinc Near-Field Magnetic Induction Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta, S., Reynolds, M. and Patel, S. N. 2010. ElectriSense: single-point sensing using EMI for electrical event detection and classification in the home. In Proc. UbiComp '10. (2010), 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harma, A., McKinney, M. and Skowronek, J. 2005. Automatic surveillance of the acoustic activity in our living environment. IEEE Int'l Conf on Multimedia and Expo,. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, G. W. 1992. Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proc. of the IEEE (1992), 1870--1891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hemminki, S., Nurmi, P. and Tarkoma, S. 2013. Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones. In Proc. Embedded Network Sensor Systems (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Idiculla, M. K. and Nair, A. S. 2006. Spectral Study on the Voltage Waveform of Claw Pole. In Proc. 20th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Itoh, H. 2014. Magnetic Field Sensor and Its Application to Automobiles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kocatepe, C., Yumurtacı, R., Arıkan, O., Baysal, M., Kekezoğlu, B., Bozkurt, A. and Kumru, C. F. 2013. Harmonic Effects of Power System Loads: An Experimental Study. Power Quality Issues.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, E., Froehlich, J., Campbell, T., Haggerty, C., Atlas, L., Fogarty, J. and Patel, S. N. 2012. Disaggregated water sensing from a single, pressure-based sensor: An extended analysis of HydroSense using staged experiments. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 8, (2012), 82--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lenz, J. and Edelstein, S. 2006. Magnetic sensors and their applications. IEEE Sensors Journal. 6, 3 (2006), 631--649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Logan, B., Healey, J., Philipose, M., Tapia, E. M. and Intille, S. 2007. A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition. In Proc. UbiComp '07 (2007), 483--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. J. Humphreys, C. J. Hammerton, D. Brown, R. Miller and L. Burley 1994. Power Control with Thyristors and Triacs. Power Semiconductor Semiconductors. Philips Applications. 485--551.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Miettinen, M. 2014. ConXsense -- Context Profiling and Classification for Context-Aware Access Control. ASIACCS '14. (2014), 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Patel, S., Gupta, S. and Reynolds, M. 2010. The design and evaluation of an end-user-deployable, whole house, contactless power consumption sensor. In Proc. CHI '10 (2010), 2471--2480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Poppe, R. 2010. A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image and Vision Computing. 28, 6 (2010), 976--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Prandoni, P. and Vetterli, M. 2008. Signal Processing for Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rowe, A., Berges, M. and Rajkumar, R. 2010. Contactless sensing of appliance state transitions through variations in electromagnetic fields. In Proc. BuildSys '10 (2010), 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Smith, B. J. R., Fishkin, K. P., Jiang, B., Mamishev, A., Philipose, M., Rea, A. D., Roy, S. and Sundararajan, K. RFID-Based Techniques for Human-Activity Detection. Communications of the ACM. 48, 9, 39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tapia, E. M., Intille, S. S. and Larson, K. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Uddin, M. 2012. MagnoTricorder: What You Need To Do Before Leaving Home. In Proc. UbiComp '12 (2012), 1096--1101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vaucelle, C., Ishii, H. and Paradiso, J. a. 2008. Electromagnetic Field Detector Bracelet. In Extended Abstracts UbiComp '08. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, E., Ipser, S., Little, P., Duncan, N. and Liu, B. 2013. Design Considerations for Leveraging Over-familiar Items for Elderly Health Monitors. In Proc. HCII '13 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang, M. and Sawchuk, A. 2012. A preliminary study of sensing appliance usage for human activity recognition using mobile magnetometer. Proc. of UbiComp '12 (2012), 745--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zouba, N., Boulay, B., Bremond, F. and Thonnat, M. 2008. Monitoring activities of daily living (ADLs) of elderly based on 3D key human postures. In Proc. ICVW '08 (2008), 37--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MagnifiSense: inferring device interaction using wrist-worn passive magneto-inductive sensors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2015
      1302 pages
      ISBN:9781450335744
      DOI:10.1145/2750858

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate101of394submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader