skip to main content
10.1145/2755573.2755574acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved Parallel Algorithms for Spanners and Hopsets

Published:13 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We use exponential start time clustering to design faster parallel graph algorithms involving distances. Previous algorithms usually rely on graph decomposition routines with strict restrictions on the diameters of the decomposed pieces. We weaken these bounds in favor of stronger local probabilistic guarantees. This allows more direct analyses of the overall process, giving:

  • Linear work parallel algorithms that construct spanners with O(k) stretch and size O(n1+1/k) in unweighted graphs, and size O(n1+1/k log k) in weighted graphs.

  • Hopsets that lead to the first parallel algorithm for approximating shortest paths in undirected graphs with O(m poly log n) work.

References

  1. Ingo Althöfer, Gautam Das, David Dobkin, Deborah Joseph, and José Soares. On sparse spanners of weighted graphs. Discrete Comput. Geom., 9(1):81--100, January 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alon, R. Karp, D. Peleg, and D. West. A graph-theoretic game and its application to the k-server problem. SIAM J. Comput., 24(1):78--100, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baruch Awerbuch. Complexity of network synchronization. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 32(4):804--823, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yair Bartal. Probabilistic approximation of metric spaces and its algorithmic applications. In Foundations of Computer Science, 1996. Proceedings., 37th Annual Symposium on, pages 184--193. IEEE, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Guy E. Blelloch, Anupam Gupta, Ioannis Koutis, Gary L. Miller, Richard Peng, and Kanat Tangwongsan. Nearly-linear work parallel SDD solvers, low-diameter decomposition, and low-stretch subgraphs. Theory Comput. Syst., 55(3):521--554, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Surender Baswana, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, and Seth Pettie. New constructions of (α,β)-spanners and purely additive spanners. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA '05, pages 672--681, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Surender Baswana, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, and Seth Pettie. Additive spanners and (α, β)-spanners. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 7(1):5, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Surender Baswana and Sandeep Sen. A simple and linear time randomized algorithm for computing sparse spanners in weighted graphs. Random Struct. Algorithms, 30(4):532--563, July 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michael B. Cohen, Gary L. Miller, Jakub W. Pachocki, Richard Peng, and Shen Chen Xu. Stretching stretch. CoRR, abs/1401.2454, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edith Cohen. Fast algorithms for constructing t-spanners and paths with stretch t. SIAM J. Comput., 28(1):210--236, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Edith Cohen. Polylog-time and near-linear work approximation scheme for undirected shortest paths. J. ACM, 47(1):132--166, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dorit Dor, Shay Halperin, and Uri Zwick. All-pairs almost shortest paths. SIAM J. Comput., 29(5):1740--1759, March 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joseph Gil, Yossi Matias, and Uzi Vishkin. Towards a theory of nearly constant time parallel algorithms. In FOCS, pages 698--710. IEEE Computer Society, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ioannis Koutis. Simple parallel and distributed algorithms for spectral graph sparsification. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA '14, pages 61--66, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Philip N Klein and Sairam Subramanian. A randomized parallel algorithm for single-source shortest paths. Journal of Algorithms, 25(2):205--220, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Howard Karloff, Siddharth Suri, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. A model of computation for mapreduce. In Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA '10, pages 938--948, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gary L. Miller, Richard Peng, Adrian Vladu, and Shen Chen Xu. Improved parallel algorithms for spanners and hopsets. CoRR, abs/1309.3545, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gary L. Miller, Richard Peng, and Shen Chen Xu. Parallel graph decompositions using random shifts. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures, SPAA '13, pages 196--203, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. David Peleg. Distributed Computing: A Locality-sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Seth Pettie. Distributed algorithms for ultrasparse spanners and linear size skeletons. In Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC '08, pages 253--262, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. David Peleg and Alejandro A. Schäffer. Graph spanners. Journal of Graph Theory, 13(1):99--116, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Liam Roditty, Mikkel Thorup, and Uri Zwick. Deterministic constructions of approximate distance oracles and spanners. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP'05, pages 261--272, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Julian Shun, Laxman Dhulipala, and Guy Blelloch. A simple and practical linear-work parallel algorithm for connectivity. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA '14, pages 143--153, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hanmao Shi and Thomas H. Spencer. Time-work tradeoffs of the single-source shortest paths problem. J. Algorithms, 30(1):19--32, January 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mikkel Thorup and Uri Zwick. Approximate distance oracles. J. ACM, 52(1):1--24, Jan 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Ullman and M. Yannakakis. High-probability parallel transitive-closure algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(1):100--125, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improved Parallel Algorithms for Spanners and Hopsets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SPAA '15: Proceedings of the 27th ACM symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
      June 2015
      362 pages
      ISBN:9781450335881
      DOI:10.1145/2755573
      • General Chair:
      • Guy Blelloch,
      • Program Chair:
      • Kunal Agrawal

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SPAA '15 Paper Acceptance Rate31of131submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

      Upcoming Conference

      SPAA '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader