skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767763acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Tailoring Music Recommendations to Users by Considering Diversity, Mainstreaminess, and Novelty

Published:09 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

A shortcoming of current approaches for music recommendation is that they consider user-specific characteristics only on a very simple level, typically as some kind of interaction between users and items when employing collaborative filtering. To alleviate this issue, we propose several user features that model aspects of the user's music listening behavior: diversity, mainstreaminess, and novelty of the user's music taste. To validate the proposed features, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of a variety of music recommendation approaches (stand-alone and hybrids) on a collection of almost 200 million listening events gathered from \propername{Last.fm}. We report first results and highlight cases where our diversity, mainstreaminess, and novelty features can be beneficially integrated into music recommender systems.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Recommender Systems Handbook, chapter Context-Aware Recommender Systems, pages 217--253. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Baltrunas, M. Kaminskas, B. Ludwig, O. Moling, F. Ricci, K.-H. Lüke, and R. Schwaiger. InCarMusic: Context-Aware Music Recommendations in a Car. In Proc. EC-Web, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. O. Celma. Music Recommendation and Discovery -- The Long Tail, Long Fail, and Long Play in the Digital Music Space. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Z. Cheng and J. Shen. Just-for-Me: An Adaptive Personalization System for Location-Aware Social Music Recommendation. In Proc. ICMR, Glasgow, UK, April 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J.-C. de Borda. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, 1781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Debole and F. Sebastiani. Supervised Term Weighting for Automated Text Categorization. In Proc. SAC, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Kaminskas, F. Ricci, and M. Schedl. Location-aware Music Recommendation Using Auto-Tagging and Hybrid Matching. In Proc. RecSys, Hong Kong, China, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H.-S. Park, J.-O. Yoo, and S.-B. Cho. A context-aware music recommendation system using fuzzy bayesian networks with utility theory. In FSKD. LNCS (LNAI), pages 970--979. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Prajapati, M. Dunne, and R. Armstrong. Sample Size Estimation and Statistical Power Analyses. Optometry Today, 16(7), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Schedl, E. Gómez, and J. Urbano. Music information retrieval: Recent developments and applications. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 8(2--3):127--261, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Schedl, D. Hauger, K. Farrahi, and M. Tkalcic. On the Influence of User Characteristics on Music Recommendation. In Proc. ECIR, Vienna, Austria, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Y. Shi, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. Collaborative Filtering Beyond the User-Item Matrix: A Survey of the State of the Art and Future Challenges. ACM Comput. Surv., 47(1):3:1--3:45, May 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Wang, D. Rosenblum, and Y. Wang. Context-aware mobile music recommendation for daily activities. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yuan Cao Zhang, Diarmuid O Seaghdha, Daniele Quercia, Tamas Jambor. Auralist: Introducing Serendipity into Music Recommendation. In Proc. WSDM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tailoring Music Recommendations to Users by Considering Diversity, Mainstreaminess, and Novelty

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        August 2015
        1198 pages
        ISBN:9781450336215
        DOI:10.1145/2766462

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of351submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader