skip to main content
10.1145/2774993.2775064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

GitFlow: flow revision management for software-defined networks

Published:17 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our work addresses the problem of revision control for flow state management in SDN-enabled networks, so that the underlying data plane might be able to provide better state protection, provenance, ease of programmability, and support for multiple applications. Inspired by the revision control tools in the software development world, we propose an abstraction and a system called GitFlow, which provides flow state revisioning in the SDN context. The core idea of GitFlow is to run a repository server to maintain the authoritative copy of the flow configuration state and track additional meta data for each evolving snapshot of the flow state. When multiple applications make incremental commits to state, our system also automates conflict resolution by rebasing new flow state with committed flow state. We envision that our revision control abstraction will provide safety in the data plane and better programmability in the control plane.

References

  1. Andersen, D. G., Balakrishnan, H., Feamster, N., Koponen, T., Moon, D., and Shenker, S. Accountable internet protocol (AIP). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication (Seattle, WA, USA, 2008), SIGCOMM '08, ACM, pp. 339--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dhamdhere, A., and Dovrolis, C. Twelve years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19, 5 (Oct. 2011), 1420--1433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Git-A Distributed Version Control System. http://git-scm.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Heller, B., Scott, C., McKeown, N., Shenker, S., Wundsam, A., Zeng, H., Whitlock, S., Jeyakumar, V., Handigol, N., McCauley, J., Zarifis, K., and Kazemian, P. Leveraging SDN layering to systematically troubleshoot networks. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (Hong Kong, China, 2013), HotSDN '13, ACM, pp. 37--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kazemian, P., Varghese, G., and McKeown, N. Header Space Analysis: Static Checking for Networks. NSDI (2012), 113--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Khurshid, A., Zou, X., Zhou, W., Caesar, M., and Godfrey, P. B. VeriFlow: Verifying Network-Wide Invariants in Real Time. NSDI (2013), 15--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., and Turner, J. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 38, 2 (Mar. 2008), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Foster, et al. Frenetic: A network programming language. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Handigol, et al. Where is the debugger for my software-defined network? In Proceedings of the first HotSDN workshop (New York, New York, USA, Aug. 2012), pp. 55--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Natarajan, S., Huang, X., and Wolf, T. Efficient conflict detection in flow-based virtualized networks. In Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2012 International Conference on (2012), IEEE, pp. 690--696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Natarajan, S., Ramaiah, A., and Mathen, M. A Software defined Cloud-Gateway automation system using OpenFlow. CLOUDNET (2013), 219--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Openflow specification. https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/technical-library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Porras, P., Shin, S., Yegneswaran, V., and Fong, M. A security enforcement kernel for OpenFlow networks. In Proceedings of the first HotSDN Workshop (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ramachandran, A., Bhandankar, K., Tariq, M. B., and Feamster, N. Packets with provenance. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Poster (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Jain, et al. B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 43, 4 (Aug. 2013), 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sherwood, R. Can the production network be the testbed. In USENIX OSDI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sherwood, R., Gibb, G., and Yap, K. K. Flowvisor: A network virtualization layer. Open Networking Foundation (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wundsam, A., Levin, D., Seetharaman, S., and Feldmann, A. OFRewind: enabling record and replay troubleshooting for networks. In Proceedings of the 2011 USENIX ATC (June 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. GitFlow: flow revision management for software-defined networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SOSR '15: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research
        June 2015
        226 pages
        ISBN:9781450334518
        DOI:10.1145/2774993

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SOSR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate7of43submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate7of43submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader