skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2783344acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inferring Air Quality for Station Location Recommendation Based on Urban Big Data

Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper tries to answer two questions. First, how to infer real-time air quality of any arbitrary location given environmental data and historical air quality data from very sparse monitoring locations. Second, if one needs to establish few new monitoring stations to improve the inference quality, how to determine the best locations for such purpose? The problems are challenging since for most of the locations (>99%) in a city we do not have any air quality data to train a model from. We design a semi-supervised inference model utilizing existing monitoring data together with heterogeneous city dynamics, including meteorology, human mobility, structure of road networks, and point of interests (POIs). We also propose an entropy-minimization model to suggest the best locations to establish new monitoring stations. We evaluate the proposed approach using Beijing air quality data, resulting in clear advantages over a series of state-of-the-art and commonly used methods.

References

  1. T. H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms (3rd ed.), MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Donald. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proc. of the National Conference. pp. 517--524. 1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. V. Donkelaar, R. V. Martin, and R. J. Park (2006), Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D21201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Du, Z. Xing, M. Li, B. He, L. H. C. Chua, and H. Miao. Optimal sensor placement and measurement of wind for water quality studies in urban reservoirs. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Net-works ISPN, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Erdös, V. Ishakian, A. Lapets, E. Terzi, and A. Bestavros. The filter-placement problem and its application to minimizing information multiplicity. In Proc. VLDB 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Hasenfratz, O. Saukh, S. Sturzenegger, and L. Thiele. Participatory Air Pollution Monitoring Using Smartphones. In the 2nd International Workshop on Mobile Sensing 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Hooyberghs, C. Mensink, G. Dumont, F. Fierens, and O. Brasseur (2005). Aneural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 3279--3289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Y. Jiang, K. Li, L. Tian, R. Piedrahita, X. Yun, O. Mansata, Q. Lv, R. P. Dick, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang. Maqs: A personalized mobile sensing system for indoor air quality. In Proc. of UbiComp 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Karamshuk, A. Noulas, S. Scellato, V. Nicosia, and C. Mascolo. Geo-spotting: mining online location-based services for optimal retail store placement. In Proc. of KDD 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Krause, J. Leskovec, C. Guestrin, J. VanBriesen, and C. Faloutsos. Efficient Sensor Placement Optimization for Securing Large Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Re-sources Planning and Management, 134(6), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Krause, R. Rajagopal, A. Gupta, and C. Guestrin. Simultaneous Optimization of Sensor Placements and Balanced Schedules. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wei-Zen Lu, and Wen-Jian Wang. Potential assessment of the "support vector machine" method in forecasting ambient air pollutant trends. Chemosphere 59: 693--701, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Niska, T. Hiltunen, A. Karppinen, J. Ruuskanen, and M. Kolehmainen. Evolving the neural network model for forecast-ing air pollution time series. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17, 159--167, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. A. Oliver and R. Webster. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information system. INT. J. Geographical Information Systems, VOL. 4, No. 3, 313--332, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Perez, R. Palacios and A. Castillo. Carbon Monoxide Concentration Forecasting in Santiage, Chile. Journal of the air and waste management association 54:908--913. ISSN 1047--3289. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Pourali and A. Mosleh. A Functional Sensor Placement Optimization Method for Power Systems Health Monitoring, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications, 49(4), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Vardoulakis, B. E. A. Fisher, K. Pericleous, N. Gonzalez-Flesca. Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 155--182, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Y. Zheng, F. Liu, H- P. Hsieh, U-Air: When Urban Air Quality Inference Meets Big Data. In Proc. of KDD 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Zheng, L. Capra, O. Wolfson, H. Yang. Urban Computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transaction on Intelligent Systems and Technology (ACM TIST). 5(3), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Zheng, X. Chen, Q. Jin, Y. Chen, X. Qu, X. Liu, E. Chang, W-Y. Ma, Y. Rui, W. Sun. A Cloud-Based Knowledge Discovery System for Monitoring Fine-Grained Air Quality. MSR-TR-2014-40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani and J. Lafferty. Semi-Supervised Learning Using Gaussian Fields and Harmonic Functions. ICML 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inferring Air Quality for Station Location Recommendation Based on Urban Big Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
          August 2015
          2378 pages
          ISBN:9781450336642
          DOI:10.1145/2783258

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 August 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader