skip to main content
10.1145/2786006.2786008acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Batch processing of Top-k Spatial-textual Queries

Published:31 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Top-k spatial-textual queries have received significant attention in the research community. Several techniques to efficiently process this class of queries are now widely used in a variety of applications. However, the problem of how best to process multiple queries efficiently is not well understood. Applications relying on processing continuous streams of queries, and offline pre-processing of other queries could benefit from solutions to this problem. In this work, we study practical solutions to efficiently process a set of top-k spatial-textual queries. We propose an efficient best-first algorithm for the batch processing of top-k spatial-textual queries that promotes shared processing and reduced I/O in each query batch. By grouping similar queries and processing them simultaneously, we are able to demonstrate significant performance gains using publicly available datasets.

References

  1. Google annual search statistics. http://www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches. {Online; accessed 20-03-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Chen, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Spatial keyword query processing: an experimental evaluation. In VLDB, pages 217--228, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 2(1):337--348, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Guttman. R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In SIGMOD, pages 47--57, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. M. Ponte and W. B. Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 275--281, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. B. Rocha-Junior, O. Gkorgkas, S. Jonassen, and K. Nørvåg. Efficient processing of top-k spatial keyword queries. In SSTD, pages 205--222, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. SearchEngineLand. Microsoft: 53 percent of mobile searches have local intent. http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-53-percent-of-mobile-searches-have-local-intent-55556. {Online; accessed 20-03-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Wu, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. A framework for efficient spatial web object retrieval. PVLDB, 21(6):797--822, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Wu, M. L. Yiu, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. Joint top-k spatial keyword query processing. TKDE, 24(10):1889--1903, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Zhisheng, K. C. K. Lee, Z. Baihua, L. Wang-Chien, L. Dik Lun, and W. Xufa. IR-tree: An efficient index for geographic document search. TKDE, 23(4):585--599, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Zobel, A. Moffat, and K. Ramamohanarao. Inverted files versus signature files for text indexing. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 23(4): 453--490, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Batch processing of Top-k Spatial-textual Queries

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GeoRich'15: Second International ACM Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data
      May 2015
      44 pages
      ISBN:9781450336680
      DOI:10.1145/2786006

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 May 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      GeoRich'15 Paper Acceptance Rate5of13submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader