skip to main content
10.1145/2811587.2811631acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Building a Large Dataset for Model-based QoE Prediction in the Mobile Environment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The tremendous growth in video services, specially in the context of mobile usage, creates new challenges for network service providers: How to enhance the user's Quality of Experience (QoE) in dynamic wireless networks (UMTS, HSPA, LTE/LTE-A). The network operators use different methods to predict the user's QoE. Generally to predict the user's QoE, methods are based on collecting subjective QoE scores given by users. Basically, these approaches need a large dataset to predict a good perceived quality of the service. In this paper, we setup an experimental test based on crowdsourcing approach and we build a large dataset in order to predict the user's QoE in mobile environment in term of Mean Opinion Score (MOS). The main objective of this study is to measure the individual/global impact of QoE Influence Factors (QoE IFs) in a real environment. Based on the collective dataset, we perform 5 testing scenarios to compare 2 estimation methods (SVM and ANFIS) to study the impact of the number of the considered parameters on the estimation. It became clear that using more parameters without any weighing mechanisms can produce bad results.

References

  1. L. Amour, S. Souihi, S. Hoceini, and A. Mellouk. A hierarchical classification model of qoe influence factors. 13th International Conference on Wired and Wireless Internet Communications, May 25--27, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. F.E. and C. Dupont. Package 'hmisc'. available at:. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/Hmisc.pdf", April, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. I. for Statistics and M. of WU. R software. http://www.r-project.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Gomez, L. Hortiguela, Q. Perez, J. Lorca, R. Garcia, and M. C. A. Torres. Youtube qoe evaluation tool for android wireless terminals. CoRR journal, 1405--4709, 02 Jun, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Gupta, R. Kambli, S. Wagh, and F. Kazi. Support-vector-machine-based proactive cascade prediction in smart grid using probabilistic framework. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 62(4):2478--2486, April 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Hofeld, F. Liers, R. Schatz, B. Staehle, D. Staehle, T. Volkert, and F. Wamser. Quality of Experience Management for YouTube: Clouds, FoG and the AquareYoum, volume 35. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ITU-T. Report 2007. definition of quality of experience (qoe). International Telecommunication Union, Liaison Statement, January 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Khan, L. Sun, and E. Ifeachor. Content-based video quality prediction for mpeg4 video streaming over wireless networks. Journal of Multimedia, 4(4), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A., and A. Sanchez. Measuring quality of experience on a commercial mobile tv platform. In Advances in Multimedia (MMEDIA), 2010 Second International Conferences on, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H.-I. C. Murat Copcu. The quality of contextual experience of multimedia on the smartphone. International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (IJESE), Volume-3 Issue-3:30--33, January 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. S. Riza, C. Bergmeir, F. Herrera, and J. M. Benitez. Learning from data using the r package" frbs". Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 2149--2155, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. T., S. M., M. Hirth, T. Zinner, P. Tran-Gia, and R. Schatz. Quantification of youtube qoe via crowdsourcing. In Multimedia (ISM), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 494--499, Dec 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Building a Large Dataset for Model-based QoE Prediction in the Mobile Environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MSWiM '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
      November 2015
      358 pages
      ISBN:9781450337625
      DOI:10.1145/2811587

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      MSWiM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate34of142submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader