skip to main content
10.1145/2820783.2820837acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bike-sharing systems are widely deployed in many major cities, providing a convenient transportation mode for citizens' commutes. As the rents/returns of bikes at different stations in different periods are unbalanced, the bikes in a system need to be rebalanced frequently. Real-time monitoring cannot tackle this problem well as it takes too much time to reallocate the bikes after an imbalance has occurred. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical prediction model to predict the number of bikes that will be rent from/returned to each station cluster in a future period so that reallocation can be executed in advance. We first propose a bipartite clustering algorithm to cluster bike stations into groups, formulating a two-level hierarchy of stations. The total number of bikes that will be rent in a city is predicted by a Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT). Then a multi-similarity-based inference model is proposed to predict the rent proportion across clusters and the inter-cluster transition, based on which the number of bikes rent from/ returned to each cluster can be easily inferred. We evaluate our model on two bike-sharing systems in New York City (NYC) and Washington D.C. (D.C.) respectively, confirming our model's advantage beyond baseline approaches (0.03 reduction of error rate), especially for anomalous periods (0.18/0.23 reduction of error rate).

References

  1. Bargar A., Gupta A., Gupta S., Ma D. 2014. Interactive visual analytics for multi-city bikeshare data analysis. In Proc. of the 3rd Urbcomp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benchimol M., Benchimol P., Chappert B., Taille A. D. L., Laroche F., Meunier F., and Robinet L. 2011. Balancing the stations of a self-service "bike hire" system. RAIRO-Operations Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 37--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bhatia, N. and Vandana. 2010. Survey of nearest neighbor techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 302--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgnat P., Abry P., Flandrin P., Robardet C., Rouquier J., and Fleury E. 2011. Shared Bicycles in a City: a Signal Processing and Data Analysis Perspective. Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 415--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Borgnat P., Robardet C., Abry P., Flandrin P., Rouquier J., and Tremblay N. 2013. A dynamical network view of Lyon's Vélo'v shared bicycle system. Dynamics On and Of Complex Networks, vol. 2, pp. 267--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chemla D., Meunier F., and Wolfler-Calvo R. 2011. Balancing a bike-sharing system with multiple vehicles. In Proc. of Congress annual de la société Française de recherche opérationelle et d'aidea la décision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Contardo C., Morency C., and Rousseau L. 2012. Balancing a dynamic public bike-sharing system. CIRRELT, vol. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Côme E., Oukhellou L. 2014. Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing sbystem usage mining, a case study with the Vélib's system of Paris. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 39:1--39:2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. DeMaio P. 2009. Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 41--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dell'Olio L., Ibeas A., and Moura J. L. 2011. Implementing bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 89--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Friedman J. H. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189--1232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Froehlich J., Neumann J., and Oliver N. 2009. Sensing and Predicting the Pulse of the City through Shared Bicycling. In Proc. of the 21st IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kaltenbrunner A., Meza R., Grivolla J., Codina J., and Banches R. 2010. Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 455--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lin J. and Yang T. 2011. Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 284--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pan B., Zheng Y., Wilkie D., Shahabi C. 2013. Crowd Sensing of Traffic Anomalies based on Human Mobility and Social Media. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Seeger M. 2004. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. International Journal of Neural Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 69--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Shang J., Zheng Y., Tong W., Chang E., and Yu Y. 2014. Inferring Gas Consumption and Pollution Emission of Vehicles throughout a City. In Proc. of the 20th KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shaheen S., Guzman S., and Zhang H. 2010. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2143, pp. 159--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Vogel P., Greiser T., and Mattefeld D. C. 2011. Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 514--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Vogel P. and Mattfeld D. C. 2011. Strategic and operational planning of bike-sharing systems by data mining- a case study. Computational Logistics, pp. 127--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wang Y., Zheng Y., and Xue Y. 2014. Travel Time Estimation of a Path using Sparse Trajectories. In Proc. of the 20th KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yoon J. W., Pinelli F., and Calabrese F. 2012. Cityride: a predictive bike sharing journey advisor. In Proc. of the 13th IEEE ICMDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yuan J., Zheng Y., Xie X., and Sun G. 2011. Driving with Knowledge from the Physical World. In Proc. of the 17th KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yuan J., Zheng Y., Zhang C., Xie W., Xie X., Sun G., and Huang Y. 2010. T-Drive: Driving Directions Based on Taxi Trajectories. In Proc. of the 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zheng Y., Capra L., Wolfson O., and Yang H. 2014. Urban Computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 38:1--38:55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Data: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=255961Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGSPATIAL '15: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
          November 2015
          646 pages
          ISBN:9781450339674
          DOI:10.1145/2820783

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 November 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGSPATIAL '15 Paper Acceptance Rate38of212submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader