skip to main content
10.1145/285237.285256acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Data networks as cascades: investigating the multifractal nature of Internet WAN traffic

Published:01 October 1998Publication History

ABSTRACT

In apparent contrast to the well-documented self-similar (i.e., monofractal) scaling behavior of measured LAN traffic, recent studies have suggested that measured TCP/IP and ATM WAN traffic exhibits more complex scaling behavior, consistent with multifractals. To bring multifractals into the realm of networking, this paper provides a simple construction based on cascades (also known as multiplicative processes) that is motivated by the protocol hierarchy of IP data networks. The cascade framework allows for a plausible physical explanation of the observed multifractal scaling behavior of data traffic and suggests that the underlying multiplicative structure is a traffic invariant for WAN traffic that co-exists with self-similarity. In particular, cascades allow us to refine the previously observed self-similar nature of data traffic to account for local irregularities in WAN traffic that are typically associated with networking mechanisms operating on small time scales, such as TCP flow control.To validate our approach, we show that recent measurements of Internet WAN traffic from both an ISP and a corporate environment are consistent with the proposed cascade paradigm and hence with multifractality. We rely on wavelet-based time-scale analysis techniques to visualize and to infer the scaling behavior of the traces, both globally and locally. We also discuss and illustrate with some examples how this cascade-based approach to describing data network traffic suggests novel ways for dealing with networking problems and helps in building intuition and physical understanding about the possible implications of multifractality on issues related to network performance analysis.

References

  1. 1.P. Abry and D. Veitch. Wavelet analysis of long-range dependent traffic. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 44, pp. 2-15, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.A. Arneodo. Wavelet analysis of fractals: From the mathematical concept to experimental reality. In M. Y. Hussaini, editor, Wavelets: Theory and Application, pp. 349-502. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.A. Bruce and H.-Y. Gao. Applied Wavelet Analyst8 with S-Plus. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.K. C. Claffy, H.-W. Braun, and G. C. Polyzos. A parameterizable methodology for internet traffic flow profiling IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, pp. 1481-1494, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros. Self-similarity in world wide web traffic - evidence and possible causes. Proceedings of A CM Sigmetrics'96, pp. 160-169, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.I. Daubechies. Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.A. Erramilli, O. Narayan and W. Willinger. Experimental queueing analysis with long-range dependent packet traffic. IEEE/A CM Transactions on Networking 4, pp. 209-223, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.C. J. G. Evertsz and B. B. Mandelbrot. Multifractal measures. In H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jurgens and D. Saupe, editors, Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers in Science, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.A. Feldmann, A. C. Gilbert. W. Willinger and T. G. Kurtz. The changing nature of network traffic: Scaling phenomena. Computer Communication Review 28, No. 2, April 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.A. Feldmann, J. Rexford and R. Caceres. Reducing Overhead in Flow-Switched Networks: An Empirical Study of Web Traffic. Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM'98, 1998 (to appear).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.A. C. Gilbert, W. Willinger and A. Feldmann. Scaling analysis of random cascades in network traffic. Preprint. 1998Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.M. Grossglauser and J.-C. Bolot. On the relevance of long-range dependence in network traffic. Proc. of the ACM/SIGCOMM'96, Stanford, CA, pp. 15-24, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.V. K. Gupta and E. C. Waymire. A statistical analysis of mesoscale rainfall as a random cascade. Journal of Applied Meteorology 32, pp. 251-267, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.R. Holley and E. C. Waymire. Multifractal dimensions and scaling exponents for strongly bounded random cascades. Annals of Applied Probability 2, pp. 819-845, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.G. Kaiser. A friendly guide to wavelets, Birkhauser, Boston, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.T. G. Kurtz. Limit theorems for workload input models. In F. P. Kelly, S. Zachary, and I. Ziedins, editors, Stochastic Networks: Theory and Applications. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger and D. V. Wilson. On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (Extended Version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2, pp. 1-15, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.J. Levy-Vehel and R. Riedi. Fractional Brownian motion and data traffic modeling: The other end of the spectrum. In FractaIs in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 185- 202, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.P. Mannersalo and I. Norros. Multifractal analysis of real ATM traffic: A first look. COST257TD, VTT Information Technology, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.S. McCanne and S. Floyd. NS: Network Simulator. http://www-mash, cs. berkeley, edu/ns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Y. Meyer and R. Coifman. Wavelets: Calderdn-Zygmund and muItitinear operators, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 52-54, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.E. W. Montroll and M. F. Shlesinger. On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, pp. 3380-3383, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.V. Paxson. End-to-end routing behavior in the Internet. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.V. Paxson. End-to-end Internet packet dynamics. Proc. o} the A CM/SIGCOMM'97, Cannes,France, pp. 139-152, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.V. Paxson and S. Floyd. Wide area traffic: The failure of poisson modeling. IEEE/A CM Transactions on Networking 3, pp. 226-244, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.R. H. Riedi and J. Levy-Vehel. TCP traffic is multifractal: A numerical study. Preprint, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.B. K. Ryu and A. Elwalid. The importance of long-range dependence of VBR video traffic in ATM traffic engineering: Myths and Realities. Proc. o} the A CM/SIGCOMM'96, Stanford, CA, pp. 3-14, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.M. S. Taqqu, V. Teverovsky and W. Willinger. Is network traffic self-similar or multifractal? Fractats 5, pp. 63-73, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. 29.A. H. Tewfik and M. Kim. Correlation structure of the discrete wavelet coefficients of fractional Brownian motion. IEEE Trans. or~ In}o. Theory, vo}. 38, 2, pp. 904-909, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.W. Willinger, V. Paxson, and M. S. Taqqu. Self-similarity and heavy tails: Structural modeling of network traffic. In R. Adler, R. Feldman, and M. S. Taqqu, editors, A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails: Statistical Techniques .for Analyzing Heavy Tailed Distributions, Birkhauser Verlag, Boston, 1998 (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.W. Willinger, M. S. Taqqu, R. Sherman, and D. V. Wilson. Self-similarity through high-variability: Statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 5, pp. 71-86, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Data networks as cascades: investigating the multifractal nature of Internet WAN traffic

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCOMM '98: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '98 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
              October 1998
              328 pages
              ISBN:1581130031
              DOI:10.1145/285237

              Copyright © 1998 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 October 1998

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGCOMM '98 Paper Acceptance Rate26of247submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader