skip to main content
10.1145/2856767.2856795acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent

Published:07 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the design and evaluation of a co-creative drawing partner called the Drawing Apprentice, which was designed to improvise and collaborate on abstract sketches with users in real time. The system qualifies as a new genre of creative technologies termed "casual creators" that are meant to creatively engage users and provide enjoyable creative experiences rather than necessarily helping users make a higher quality creative product. We introduce the conceptual framework of participatory sense-making and describe how it can help model and understand open-ended collaboration. We report the results of a user study comparing human-human collaboration to human-computer collaboration using the Drawing Apprentice system. Based on insights from the user study, we present a set of design recommendations for co-creative agents.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

iuifp433.mp4

mp4

24 MB

References

  1. Baylor, A. L. Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364, (2009) 1535: 3559--3565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Biles, A. J. GenJam: A genetic algorithm for generating jazz solos. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Citeseer, (1994), 131--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boden, M. A. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London. 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Charman, T., Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G. and Drew, A. Infants with autism: an investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation. Developmental psychology 33, 5 (1997), 781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Colton, S., Wiggins, G. A. Computational creativity: The final frontier? ECAI, (2012) 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Compton, K. and Mateas, M. Casual Creators. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity June, 228. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, N., Comerford, M., Jacob, M. Hsiao, C.-P. and Magerko, B. An Enactive Characterization of Pretend Play. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, (2015), 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davis, N., Do, E. Y.-L. Gupta, P. and Gupta, S. Computing harmony with PerLogicArt: perceptual logic inspired collaborative art. Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, (2011) 185--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-P., Popova, Y. and Magerko, B. An Enactive Model of Creativity for Computational Collaboration and Co-creation. In Creativity in the Digital Age. Springer, (2015), 109--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-P., Singh, K. Y., Li, L, Moningi, S. and Magerko, B. Drawing Apprentice: An Enactive Co-Creative Agent for Artistic Collaboration. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, (2015), 185--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dixon, D., Prasad, M. and Hammond, T. iCanDraw: using sketch recognition and corrective feedback to assist a user in drawing human faces. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2010), 897--906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Edmonds, E. and Candy, L. Computer support for creativity. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 63, ( 2005), 4--5: Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fantasia, V., De Jaegher, H. and Fasulo, A. We can work it out: an enactive look at cooperation. Frontiers in psychology 5. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Flagg, M. and Rehg, J. M. Projector-guided painting. Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM Press, (2006), 235--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fuchs, T. and De Jaegher, H. Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8, 4 (2009), 465--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gulz, A. and Haake, M. Design of animated pedagogical agents--A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 4 (2006), 322--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hodhod, R., Piplica, A. and Magerko, B. A formal model of shared mental models for computational improvisational agents. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hodhod, R., Magerko, B. and Gawish, M. Pharaoh: Context-Based Structural Retrieval of Cognitive Scripts. International Journal of Information Retrieval Research (IJIRR), 2, 3 (2012), 58--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hodhod, R. and Magerko, B. Pharaoh: Conceptual Blending of Cognitive Scripts for Computationally Creative Agents. The Twenty-Seventh International Flairs Conference. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodhod, R. and Magerko, B. Closing the Cognitive Gap between Humans and Interactive Narrative Agents Using Shared Mental Models. 21st Annual Intelligent User Interfaces Conference. 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hoffman, G. and Weinberg, G. Shimon: an interactive improvisational robotic marimba player. CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2010), 3097--3102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jacob, M., Coisne, G., Gupta, A, Sysoev, I., Gav Verma, G., and Magerko, B. Viewpoints AI. AIIDE. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacob, M., Zook, A. and Magerko, B. Viewpoints AI: Procedurally Representing and Reasoning about Gestures. Proceedings of DiGRA. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. De Jaegher, H. and Di Paolo, E. Participatory sensemaking. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 6, 4 (2007), 485--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, Y. J., Zitnick, C. L. and Cohen, M. F. ShadowDraw: real-time user guidance for freehand drawing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 27. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lubart, T. How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 63, 4--5 (2005), 365--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Magerko, B., Dohogne, P and DeLeon, C. Employing Fuzzy Concept for Digital Improvisational Theatre. AIIDE. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. O'Neill, B., Piplica, A., Fuller, D. and Magerko, B. A Knowledge-Based Framework for the Collaborative Improvisation of Scene Introductions. In Interactive Storytelling SE - 10, Mei Si, David Thue, Elisabeth André, JamesC. Lester, Joshua Tanenbaum and Veronica Zammitto (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2011), 85--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Piplica, A., DeLeon, C. and Magerko, B. Full-body gesture interaction with improvisational narrative agents. Intelligent Virtual Agents, (2012), 514--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sawyer, R. K. and DeZutter, S. Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3, 2 (2009), 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Schertz, H. H. and Odom, S. L. Promoting joint attention in toddlers with autism: A parent-mediated developmental model. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 37, 8 (2007), 1562--1575.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneiderman, B. Accelerating Discovery and Innovation. Communications of the ACM 50, 12. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M. et al. Creativity Support Tools: Report From a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 2 (2006), 61--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O. and Di Paolo, E. Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Voigt, M., Niehaves, B. and Becker, J. Towards a Unified Design Theory for Creativity Support Systems. GroupSystems (2011), 152--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wardrip-Fruin, N. Expressive Processing: Digital fictions, computer games, and software studies. MIT press. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Weizenbaum, J. ELIZA--a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM 9, (1966), 36--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wiggins, G. A. Searching for computational creativity. New Generation Computing 24, 3, (2006), 209--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wiggins, G. A. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 19, 7 (2006), 449--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '16: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
      March 2016
      446 pages
      ISBN:9781450341370
      DOI:10.1145/2856767

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IUI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate49of194submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader