skip to main content
10.1145/2857546.2857603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Ontology-based Approach for Business Process Compliance Checking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 January 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The early detection of flaws and errors has become a significant feature of a business process modeling tool. This paper proposes an ontology-based approach for business process compliance checking. The business processes and the business rules are represented in a machine understandable form, a reasoner is used to reason on this knowledge base for detecting the potential semantic error by using a set of predefined rules.

References

  1. Ryan K. L. Ko, Stephen S. G. Lee, and Eng Wah Lee, "Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey," Business process Management Journal, vol. 15, pp. 744--791, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marc Fasbinder, "Why model business processes", 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. J. Hommes, "The Evaluation of Business process Modeling Techniques," Delft University of Technology, Ph.D. thesis 90-9017698-5, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig Schlenoff, Michael Gruninger, Florence Tissot, John Valois, Taddle Creek Road, Steptools Inc, Josh Lubell, Jintae Lee, "The Process Specification Language (PSL) Overview and Version 1.0 Specification,1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jos de Brujin, Holger Lausen, Axel Polleres, Dieter Fensel: The Web Service Modeling Language WSML: An Overview. ESWC 2006: 590--604,2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Armin Haller, Mateusz Marmolowski, Eyal Oren, Walid Gaaloul, "oXPDL: a Process Model Exchange Ontology",2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinrich Herre, "General Formal Ontology (GFO): A Foundational Ontology for Conceptual Modelling", Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications 2010, pp 297--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Emiliano Reynares, Ma Laura Caliusco, Ma Rosa Galli, "An automatable approach for SBVR to OWL 2 mappings", 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gintare Bernotaityte, Lina Nemuraite, Rita Butkiene, and Bronius Paradauskas, "Developing SBVR Vocabularies and Business Rules from OWL2 Ontologies", ICIST, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Emiliano Reynares, Ma Laura Caliusco, Ma Rosa Galli, "SBVR to OWL 2 Mappings: An Automatable and Structural-Rooted Approach", In CLEI ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gintare Bernotaityte, Lina Nemuraite, Rita Butkiene, Bronius Paradauskas, "Developing SBVR Vocabularies and Business Rules from OWL2 Ontologies", Information and Software Technologies Communications in Computer and Information Science Volume 403, 2013, pp 134--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Liu Feng, Zhang Wei. Colored Petri net extended with price information and its applicaion{J}. Journal of Computer Applications; 2007, 201:2501--2503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sören Auer, Sebastian Dietzold, and Thomas Riechert. OntoWiki --- A Tool for Social, Semantic Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, number 4273 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 736--749. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tuan Anh Pham, Thi-Hoa-Hue Nguyen, Nhan Le Thanh: Ontology-based business process validation. RIVF 2015: 41--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: Swrl: A semantic web rule language combining owl and ruleml. W3C Member Submission (May 21 2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. WMP Van Der Aalst, AHM Ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and AP Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5--51, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Russell, A. ter Hofstede, D. Edmond, and W. van der Aalst. Workflow data patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. Conceptual Modeling-ER 2005, pages 353--368, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H.N. Tran, B. Coulette, and B.T. Dong. Broadening the use of process patterns for modeling processes. Proc. SEKE, Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, pages 57--62, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Awad, S. Smirnov, and M. Weske. Towards Resolving Compliance Violations in Business Process Models. GRCIS. CEUR-WS. org, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. I. Weber, J. Homann, and J. Mendling. Semantic business process validation. In Proc. of International workshop on Semantic Business Process Management, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Governatori, Z. Milosevic, and S. Sadiq. Compliance checking between business processes and business contracts. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2006. EDOC'06. 10th IEEE International, pages 221--232. IEEE, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Thom, M. Reichert, C. Chiao, C. Iochpe, and G. Hess. Inventing Less, Reusing More, and Adding Intelligence to Business Process Modeling. In Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 837850. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. El Kharbili, S. Stein, I. Markovic, and Pulverm E. Towards a framework for semantic business process compliance management. In Proceedings of the workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance for Information Systems, pages 1--15. Citeseer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. F. Arbab, N. Kokash, and S. Meng. Towards using reo for compliance-aware business process modeling. Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation, pages 108--123, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. T. Gschwind, J. Koehler, and J. Wong. Applying patterns during business process modeling. In BPM, volume 5240, pages 4--19. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Eggert, M., Schwittay, S.: Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches -- A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap. BuR - Business Research 5, 221--247 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van der Werf, J.M., Mattheis, P.: Separating Compliance Man gement and Business Process Management. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 459--464. Springer, Heidelberg(2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuan Anh Pham, Nhan Le Thanh.: A Rule-Based Language for Integrating Business Processes and Business Rules. The 9th International Web Rule Symposium (RuleML), Berlin, Germany, 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. An Ontology-based Approach for Business Process Compliance Checking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMCOM '16: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      January 2016
      658 pages
      ISBN:9781450341424
      DOI:10.1145/2857546

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 January 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader