skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858348acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers who analyse smartphone usage logs often make the assumption that users who lock and unlock their phone for brief periods of time (e.g., less than a minute) are continuing the same "session" of interaction. However, this assumption is not empirically validated, and in fact different studies apply different arbitrary thresholds in their analysis. To validate this assumption, we conducted a field study where we collected user-labelled activity data through ESM and sensor logging. Our results indicate that for the majority of instances where users return to their smartphone, i.e., unlock their device, they in fact begin a new session as opposed to continuing a previous one. Our findings suggest that the commonly used approach of ignoring brief standby periods is not reliable, but optimisation is possible. We therefore propose various metrics related to usage sessions and evaluate various machine learning approaches to classify gaps in usage.

References

  1. Eytan Adar, Jaime Teevan and Susan T. Dumais. 2008. Large Scale Analysis of Web Revisitation Patterns. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1197--1206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357241 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eirik Årsand, Miroslav Muzny, Meghan Bradway, Jan Muzik and Gunnar Hartvigsen. 2015. Performance of the First Combined Smartwatch and Smartphone Diabetes Diary Application Study. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 9, 3: 556--563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296814567708Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nikola Banovic, Christina Brant, Jennifer Mankoff and Anind Dey. 2014. ProactiveTasks: The Short of Mobile Device Use Sessions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, ACM, 243--252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628380 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling Asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A Large Scale Study on Mobile Application Usage. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 47--56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037383 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Juan P. Carrascal and Karen Church. 2015. An In-Situ Study of Mobile App & Mobile Search Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 27392748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702486 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Karen Church, Denzil Ferreira, Nikola Banovic and Kent Lyons. 2015. Understanding the Challenges of Mobile Phone Usage Data. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 505 - 514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785891 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andy Cockburn and Bruce McKenzi. 2001. What Do Web Users Do? An Empirical Analysis of Web Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54, 6: 903--922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0459 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sunny Consolvo and Miriam Walker. 2003. Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 2: 24--31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203750 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tilman Dingler and Martin Pielot. 2015. I'll Be There for You: Quantifying Attentiveness Towards Mobile Messaging. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 1--5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785840 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hossein Falaki, Ratul Mahajan, Srikanth Kandula, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Ramesh Govindan and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Diversity in Smartphone Usage. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, ACM, 179--194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814453 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Denzil Ferreira, Eija Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos and Anind K. Dey. 2013. Revisiting HumanBattery Interaction with an Interactive Battery Interface. In International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 563--572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493465 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Louise Barkhuus and Anind K. Dey. 2014. Contextual Experience Sampling of Mobile Application MicroUsage. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 91--100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628367 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: mobile context instrumentation framework. Frontiers in ICT 2, 6: 1--9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fict.2015.00006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann and Ian I. H. Witten. 2009. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 1: 10--18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1656274.1656278 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joel M. Hektner, Jennifer A. Schmidt and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2007. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniel Hintze, Rainhard D. Findling, Muhammad Muaaz, Sebastian Scholz and René Mayrhofer. 2014. Diversity in Locked and Unlocked Mobile Device Usage. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, ACM, 379--384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641697 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Robert C. Holte. 1993. Very Simple Classification Rules Perform Well on Most Commonly Used Datasets. Machine Learning 11, 1: 63--90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022631118932 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink, Chris Blakely and Sherry Koshman. 2007. Defining a session on Web search engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 6: 862--871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20564 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Simon L. Jones, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves and Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. Revisitation analysis of smartphone app use. In International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 1197--1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807542 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rosie Jones and Kristina L. Klinkner. 2008. Beyond the Session Timeout: Automatic Hierarchical Segmentation of Search Topics in Query Logs. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, 699--708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1458082.1458176 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1983. The Experience Sampling Method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology (eds.). Wiley Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 15, 41--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Luis A. Leiva, Matthias Böhmer, Sven Gehring and Antonio Krüger. 2012. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions. In MobileHCI'12, 291--294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371617 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Terence R. Mitchell, Leigh Thompson, Erika Peterson and Randy Cronk. 1997. Temporal Adjustments in the Evaluation of Events: The "Rosy View". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33, 4: 421--448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Earl Oliver. 2010. The challenges in large-scale smartphone user studies. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Hot Topics in Planetscale Measurement - HotPlanet '10, Art. 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1834616.1834623 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma and Eeva Raita. 2012. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 1: 105--114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412--2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Martin Pielot, Karen Church and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2014. An In-situ Study of Mobile Phone Notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, ACM, 233--242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628364 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Martin Pielot, Tilman Dingler, Jose S. Pedro and Nuria Oliver. 2015. When Attention is Not Scarce Detecting Boredom from Mobile Phone Usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 825--836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804252 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Philipp Pushnyakov and Gleb Gusev. 2014. User Profiles Based on Revisitation Times. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 359--360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2577380 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ahmad Rahmati and Lin Zhong. 2010. A Longitudinal Study of Non-Voice Mobile Phone Usage by Teens from an Underserved Urban Community. Computing Research Repository.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale Assessment of Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3055--3064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557189 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tapio Soikkeli, Juuso Karikoski and Heikki Hämmäinen. 2011. Diversity and End User Context in Smartphone Usage Sessions. In International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, IEEE, 7--12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NGMAST.2011.12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Chad Tossell, Philip Kortum, Ahmad Rahmati, Clayton Shepard and Lin Zhong. 2012. Characterizing Web Use on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2769--2778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208676 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves and Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The Curse of Quantified-Self: An Endless Quest for Answers. In Adjunct Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct, 973--978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2800946 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Robert Xiao, Gierad Laput and Chris Harrison. 2014. Expanding the Input Expressivity of Smartwatches with Mechanical Pan, Twist, Tilt and Click. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 193--196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tingxin Yan, David Chu, Deepak Ganesan, Aman Kansal and Jie Liu. 2012. Fast app launching for mobile devices using predictive user context. In MobiSys, 113--126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307636.2307648 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader