skip to main content
10.1145/2883817.2883834acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

SCOTS: A Tool for the Synthesis of Symbolic Controllers

Published:11 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce SCOTS a software tool for the automatic controller synthesis for nonlinear control systems based on symbolic models, also known as discrete abstractions. The tool accepts a differential equation as the description of a nonlinear control system. It uses a Lipschitz type estimate on the right-hand-side of the differential equation together with a number of discretization parameters to compute a symbolic model that is related with the original control system via a feedback refinement relation. The tool supports the computation of minimal and maximal fixed points and thus natively provides algorithms to synthesize controllers with respect to invariance and reachability specifications. The atomic propositions, which are used to formulate the specifications, are allowed to be defined in terms of finite unions and intersections of polytopes as well as ellipsoids. While the main computations are done in C++, the tool contains a Matlab interface to simulate the closed loop system and to visualize the abstract state space together with the atomic propositions. We illustrate the performance of the tool with two examples from the literature. The tool and all conducted experiments are available at www.hcs.ei.tum.de.

References

  1. P. Tabuada and G. J. Pappas. "Linear Time Logic Control of Discrete-Time Linear Systems". In: IEEE TAC 51 (2006), pp. 1862--1877.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Abate et al. "Computational approaches to reachability analysis of stochastic hybrid systems". In: HSCC. Springer, 2007, pp. 4--17. {3} M. Kloetzer and C. Belta. "A fully automated framework for control of linear systems from temporal logic specifications". In: IEEE TAC 53 (2008), pp. 287--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Tabuada. Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems { A Symbolic Approach. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. E. Fainekos et al. "Temporal logic motion planning for dynamic robots". In: Automatica 45 (2009), pp. 343--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Reißig. "Computing abstractions of nonlinear systems". In: IEEE TAC 56 (2011), pp. 2583--2598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Girard. "Controller synthesis for safety and reachability via approximate bisimulation". In: Automatica 48 (2012), pp. 947--953. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Wongpiromsarn, U. Topcu, and R. M. Murray. "Receding Horizon Temporal Logic Planning". In: IEEE TAC 57 (2012), pp. 2817--2830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Zamani et al. "Symbolic Models for Nonlinear Control Systems Without Stability Assumptions". In: IEEE TAC 57 (2012), pp. 1804--1809.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Yordanov et al. "Temporal logic control of discrete-time piecewise affine systems". In: IEEE TAC 57 (2012), pp. 1491--1504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Rungger, M. Jr. Mazo, and P. Tabuada. "Specification-Guided Controller Synthesis for Linear Systems and Safe Linear-Time Temporal Logic". In: HSCC. ACM, 2013, pp. 333--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Liu et al. "Synthesis of Reactive Switching Protocols From Temporal Logic Specifications". In: IEEE TAC 58 (2013), pp. 1771--1785.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Zamani et al. "Symbolic control of stochastic systems via approximately bisimilar finite abstractions". In: IEEE TAC 59.12 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Jr. Mazo, A. Davitian, and P. Tabuada. "Pessoa: A tool for embedded controller synthesis". In: Computer Aided Verification. Springer. 2010, pp. 566--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Mouelhi, A. Girard, and G. Gössler. "CoSyMA: a tool for controller synthesis using multi-scale abstractions". In: HSCC. ACM. 2013, pp. 83--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Finucane, G. Jing, and H. Kress-Gazit. "LTLMoP: Experimenting with language, temporal logic and robot control". In: IROS. IEEE. 2010, pp. 1988--1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Wongpiromsarn et al. "TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning". In: HSCC. ACM. 2011, pp. 313--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. Piterman, A. Pnueli, and Y. Saár. "Synthesis of reactive (1) designs". In: Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Girard, G. Pola, and P. Tabuada. "Approximately bisimilar symbolic models for incrementally stable switched systems". In: IEEE TAC 55.1 (2010), pp. 116--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Reißig, A. Weber, and M. Rungger. Feedback Refinement Relations for the Synthesis of Symbolic Controllers. 2015. arXiv: 1503.03715v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. E. Bryant. "Symbolic Boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams". In: ACM Computing Surveys 24.3 (1992), pp. 293--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. F. Somenzi. "CUDD: CU decision diagram package". In: University of Colorado at Boulder (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. T. Rockafellar and R. J.-B. Wets. Variational analysis. Vol. 317. 3rd corr printing 2009. Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Gallo et al. "Directed hypergraphs and applications". In: Discrete Applied Mathematics 42 (1993), pp. 177--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SCOTS: A Tool for the Synthesis of Symbolic Controllers

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            HSCC '16: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
            April 2016
            324 pages
            ISBN:9781450339551
            DOI:10.1145/2883817

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 April 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            HSCC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate28of65submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate153of373submissions,41%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader