skip to main content
article
Free Access

Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions

Published:01 March 1987Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The paper puts information systems (IS) research dealing with IS problems into perspective. IS problems are surveyed and classified. Using the IS research framework suggested by Ives, Hamilton, and Davis, research into IS problems is classified into several perspectives whose relevance in coping with the problems is discussed. Research perspectives focusing on IS operations environment, IS development process, IS development organization, IS development methods, and IS theories are distinguished. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research and how to deal with IS problems in practice.

References

  1. ACKOFF, R. L. 1967. Management misinformation systems. Manage. Sci. 14, 4, B147-B156.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ADAMS, C. R. 1975. How management users view information systems. Decis. Sci. 6, 2, 337-345.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AHITUV, N., AND NEUMANN, S. 1984. A flexible approach to information system development. MIS Q. 8, 2, 69-78.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ALTER, S. 1980. Decision Support Systems: Current Practice and Continuing Challenges. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ALTER, S., AND GINZBERG, M. J. 1978. Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation. Sloan Manage. Rev. 19, 23-31.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ANSI/SPARC 1975. ANSI/X3/SPARC study group on data base management systems, interim report. FDT Bull. ACM SIGMOD 7, 21.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ANTHONY, R. 1965. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework Analysis. Harvard University Press, Boston.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. APPLETON, D. S. 1983. Data-driven prototyping. Datamation 29, 11, 259-268.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ATTEWELL, P., AND RULE, J. 1984. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1184-1192.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. BEATH, C. M. 1983. Strategies for managing MiS projects: A transaction cost approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems (Houston, Tex., Dec. 15-17). The Institute of Management Sciences, pp. 133-147.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BELL, T. E., AND THAYER, T. A. 1976. Software requirements: Are they really a problem? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Software Engineering (San Francisco, Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 61-68.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. BERGER, P. L., ANO LUCKMANN, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. BERILD, S., BUBENKO, J., JR., AND LINDENCRONA, E. 1984. Conceptual modeling of applications-- Theory and practice. SYSLAB Working Paper No. 77, Department of Information Processing and Computer Science, SYSLAB-S, Univ. of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. BLOOR, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. BLUMENTHAL, S. C. 1969. Management Information Systems: A Framework for Planning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. BLUMER, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. BOEHM, B. W. 1976. Software engineering. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-25 (Dec.), 1226-1241.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. BOEHM, B. W. 1981. Software Economics. M.I.T. Press, Boston.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. BOLAND, R. J., JR. 1978. The process and product of system design. Manage. Sci. 24, 9, 887-898.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. BOLANO, R. J., JR. 1979. Control, causality and information system requirements. Account. Organ. Soc. 4, 5, 259-272.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. BOLANO, R. J., JR. 1981. A study in system design. C. West Churchman and Chris Argyris. Account. Organ. Soc. 6, 2, 109-118.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. BOLAND, R. J., JR. 1984. Sense-making of accounting data as a technique of organizational diagnosis. Manage. Sci. 30, 7, 868-882.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. BOLAND, R. J., JR. 1985. Phenomenology: A preferred approach to research on information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 193-203.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. BOLANO, R. J., JR. ANO DAY, W. 1982. The process of system design: A phenomenological approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems (Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 13-15), M. Ginzberg and C. Ross, Eds. The Institute of Management Sciences, pp. 31-45.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. BOLANO, R. J., JR. AND PONDY, L. R. 1981. Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives. BEPR Faculty Working Paper No. 811, College of Commerce and Business Administration, Univ. of Illinois Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Urbana-Champaign.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. BORGIDA, A. 1985. Features of languages for the development of information systems at the conceptual level. IEEE Software 2, 1, 63-72.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. BOSTROM, R. B. 1978. A MIS metaframework. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Decision Systems. Society for Management Information Science, New York, pp. 164-166.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. BOSTROM, R. B., ANO HEINEN, J. S. 1977a. MIS problems and failures. A socio-technical perspective: Part I: The causes. MIS Q. 1, 3, 17-32.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. BOSTROM, R. B., AND HEINEN, J. S. 1977b. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective: Part II: The application of socio-technical theory. MIS Q. 1, 4, 11-28.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. BOYNTON, A. C., ANO ZMUO, R. W. 1984. An assesment of critical success factors. Sloan Manage. Rev. 26, 1, 17-27.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. BRIEFS, U. 1980. The impact of computerization on the working class and the role of trade unions. In The Human Side of Information Processing, N. Bjorn-Andersen, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 53-68.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. BROOKS, S. 1974. A Mythical Man-Month. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. BUBENKO, J. A., JR. 1980. Information modeling in the context of systems development. In Information Processing 80, S. Lavington, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. BUBENKO, J. A., JR. 1983. Information and data modeling: State of the art and research directions. In Proceedings of the 2nd Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modelling and Data Base Management, Acta Universitas Tamperensis, Ser. B, vol. 19, H. Kangassalo, Ed. Univ. of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, pp. 717-720.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. BUBENKO, J. A., JR. 1986. Information system methodologies--A research view. SYSLAB Rep. No. 40, The Systems Development and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Univ. of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. BUCKINGHAM, R. A., Ed. 1977. Education and Large Information Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. BURRELL, G., AND MORGAN, G. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Heinemann, London.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. CANNING, R. G. 1977. Getting the requirements right. EDP Anal. 15, 7, 1-14.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. CANNING, R. G. 1983. Plan now for work-stations. EDP Anal. 21, 2.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. CANNING, R. G. 1984. The changing computing environment. EDP Anal. 22, 9.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. CARLSON, E. D. 1974. Evaluating the impact of information systems. Manage. Inf. 3, 2, 57-67.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. CARLSON, W. M. 1979. Business information analysis and integration technique (BIAIT)--The new horizon. Data Base 10, 4 (spring), 3-9.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. CHAPIN, N. 1979. Some structured analysis techniques. Data Base 10, 3, 16-23.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. CHECKLAND, P. 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. CHECKLAND, P. 1984. Systems theory and information systems. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness. Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 9-22.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. CHUA, W. F., LAUGHLIN, R. C., LOWE, E. A., AND PUXTY, A. G. 1981. An integrated epistemology of theory and practical action for management science. Paper presented at the Management Epistemology Workshop of the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, University of Lancaster, Oct. 19-21.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. CHURCHMAN, C. W. 1971. The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. CIBORRA, C. U. 1981. Information systems and transactions architecture. J. Policy Anal. Inf. Syst. 5, 4, 305-324.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. CIBORRA, C. U. 1983. The social costs of information technology and participation in system design. In Systems Design {or, with and by the Users, U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 41-50.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. CIBORRA, C. U. 1984. information systems and organizational exchange: A new design approach. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems {or Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 135- 145.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. CIBORRA, C. U., AND BRACCHI, G. 1983. Systems development and auditing in turbulent contexts: Towards a new participative approach. In Information Systems Auditing, E. M. Wysong and I. de Lotto, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 41-52.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. COOPER, R. B., AND SWANSON, E. B. 1979. Management information requirements assessment. The state of the art. Data Base 11, 2, 5-16.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. COURBON, J. C., AND BOURGEOIS, M. 1980. The information systems designer as a nurturing agent of a socio-technical process. In The Information Systems Environment, H. C. Lucas, F. F. Land, T. J. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 139-148.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. CRON, W. L., AND SOBOL, M. G. 1983. The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing economic benefits of computerization. Inf. Manage. 6, 3, 171-182.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. DAVIS, G. B. 1982. Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Syst. J. 21, 1, 4-30.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. DAVIS, G. B. 1984. Management of the information systems resource: Introduction. In The In{oration Systems Research Challenge, F. W. McFarlan, Ed. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass., pp. 191-195.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. DAVIS, G. B., AND OLSON, M. 1985. Management Information Systems--Conceptual Foundations Methods and Development (2nd ed.). McGraw- Hill, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. DEBRABANDER, B., AND THIERS, G. 1984. Successful information system development in relation to situational factors which affect effective communication between MIS-users and EDP-specialists. Manage. Sci. 30, 2, 137-155.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. DE CINDIO, F., DE MICHELIS, G., $IMONE, C., VAS- SALLO, R., AND ZANABONI, A. M. 1986. CHAOS as coordination technology: Conversation handling active office systems. Working Paper, Dipart Science dell'Informazione, Univ. di Milano, Milano, Italy.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. DEMAIO, A. 1980. Socio-technical methods for information systems design. In The Information Systems Environment, H. Lucas, F. Land, T. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 105-122.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. DEMARCO, T. 1978. Structured Analysis and System Specification. Yourdon Press, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. DEMOS 1979. Systems development by negotiations: A tentative model, in Computers Dividing Man and Work, A. Sandberg, Ed. Arbetslivscentrum, Maim6, Sweden, pp. 129-146.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. DICKSON, G. W., SENN, J. A., AND CHERVANY, N. L. 1977. Research in management information systems: The Minnesota experiments. Manage. Sci. 23, 9, 913-923.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. DICKSON, G. W., LEITHEISER, R. L., WETHERBE, J. C., AND NECmS, M. 1984. Key information systems issues for the 1980s. MIS Q. 8, 3, 135- 159.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. EARL, M. J., AND HOPWOOD, A. G. 1980. From management information to information management. In The Information Systems Environment, H. Lucas, F. Land, T. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3-12.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. EHN, P., AND SANDBERG, A. 1979. Systems development: Critique of ideology and the division of labor in computer field. In Computer Dividing Man and Work, A. Sandberg, Ed. Arbetslivscentrum, Malta6, Sweden, pp. 34-46.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. EIN-DOR, P., AND SEGEV, E. 1978. Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Manage. Sci. 24, 10, 1064-1077.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. EMERY, J. C. 1971. Cost/benefit analysis of information systems. Lecture notes prepared for SMIS Workshop on Cost/Benefit Analysis, Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. EMERY, J. C. 1974. Costs and benefits of information systems. In Information Processing 74. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 967-971.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. EMERY, J. C. 1977. Managerial and economic issues in distributed computing. In Information Processing 77, B. Gilchrist, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 945-955.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. EMERY, F. E. 1972. Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In Design of Jobs, L. E. Davis and J. C. Taylor, Eds. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England, pp. 177-198.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. EPISKOPOU, D. M., AND WOOD-HARPER, A. T. 1984. A multi-view methodologyBApplications and implications. In Beyond Productivity: Informarion Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 189-211.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. FLAVlN, M. 1981. Fundamental Concepts of Information Modeling. Yourdon Press, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. FLORES, F., AND LUDLOW, J. J. 1981. Doing and speaking in the office. In Decision Support Systems-Issues and Challenges, G. Fick and R. H. Sprague, Eds. Pergamon, London, pp. 95-118.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. FLOYD, C. 1986. A comparative evaluation of system development methods. In improving the Systems Development Practice (CRIS-III), B. Olle, H. G. Sol, and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart, Eds. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 19-54.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. FRANZ, C. R., AND ROBEY, D. 1984. An investigation of user-led system design: Rational and political perspectives. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1202-1209.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. FURTADO, A. L. 1983. An informal approach to formal specifications. A CM SIGMOD Rec. 8, 1, 32-41.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. GALBRAITH, J. 1977. Organization Design. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. GARFINKEL, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnornethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. GINZBERG, M. J. 1975. A process approach to management science implementation. Ph.D. dissertation, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. GINZBERG, M. J. 1978. Steps towards more effective implementation of MS and MIS. Interfaces 8, 3, 295-300.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. GINZBERG, M. J. 1980. An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementation. Account. Org. Soc. 5, 4, 369-382.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. GINZBERG, M. J. 1981. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Manage. Sci. 27, 4, 459-478.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. GLADDEN, G. R. 1982. Stop the life-cycle, i want to get off. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 7, 2, 35-39.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. GOLDKUHL, G. 1980. Miinniskor, Information och Kommunikation--en Humaninfologisk Referensram {Sr inforrnationsystern, institutionen f6r Administrativ Databehandling, Univ. of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. GOLDKUHL, G., AND LYYTINEN, K. 1982. A language action view of information systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems (Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 13-15), M. Ginzberg and C. Ross, Eds. The Institute of Management Sciences, pp. 13-30.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. GOLDKUHL, G., AND LYYTINEN, K. 1984. Information system specification as rule reconstruction. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems for Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelroans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 30- 55.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. GORANZON, B., Ed. 1983. Datautvecklingens filosofi: Tyst kunskap och ny teknik. Carlsson & Jonsson, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. GUPTA, A. 1982. Emerging trends in office technology. In Office Information Systems, N. Naffaf, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 599-626.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. GUSTAFSSON, M. R., KARLSSON, T., AND BUBENKO, J. A. 1982. A declarative approach to conceptual information modelling. SYSLAB Tech. Rep. 8, Dept. of Information Processing and Computer Science, Univ. of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. HABERMAS, J. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society (transl. T. McCarthy). Heinemann, London.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. HAMILTON, S. 1980. Evaluation of information system effectiveness: A comparison of evaluation approaches and evaluation viewpoints. MISRC-WP-81-03, MISRC, Graduate School of Business Administration, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. HAMMER, M. 1981. Life cycle management, inf. Manage. 4, 4, 71-80.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. HEDBERG, B. 1980. Using computerized information systems to design better organizations and jobs. In The Human Side of Information Processing, N. Bjorn-Anderssen, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 19-33.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. HEDBERG, B., AND JONSSON, S. 1978. Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments. Account. Organ. Soc. 3, 1, 47-64.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. 1983. Assessing participative system design: Some conclusions from an exploratory study, Inf. Manage. 6, 4, 317-327.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. 1985. User experience with and assessment of participative systems design. MIS Q. 9, 4, 295-303.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. 1986. The effect of a priori views on the social implications of computing: The case of office automation. A CM Comput. Surv. 18, 2 (June), 165-195.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. HIRSCHHEIM, R. A., AND SMITHSON, S. 1987. A critical analysis of information systems evaluation. In Information Systems Assessment, G. B. Davis and N.-B. Andersen, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam (to appear).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. HIRSCHHEIM, R. A., LAND, F., AND SMITHSON, S. 1984. Implementing computer-based information systems in organizations--Issues and strategies. In Proceedings of the Interact-84 (London, Sept. 4-6). North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 356-369.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. HOROWITZ, E., KEMPER, A., AND NARASIMHAN, B. 1985. Application generators. IEEE Software 2, 1, 40-54.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. HOYER, R. 1980. User participation: Why is development so slow? In The Information Systems Environment, H. C. Lucas, F. F. Land, T. J. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 129-138.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. HUBER, G. P. 1981. Organizational science contributions to the design of decision support systems. In Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, G. Fick and R. H. Sprague, Eds. Pergamon, London, pp. 45-55.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. HUBER, G. P. 1983. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Manage. Sci. 29, 5, 567-577.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. IBM 1981. Business systems planning--Information systems planning guide. Application manual, GE20-0527-3 (3rd ed.), IBM Corp.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. hVARI, J. 1983. Contributions to the theoretical foundations of systemeering research and the PIOCO-model, Ph.D. dissertation Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Ser. A 150, Institute of Data Processing, Univ. of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. IVES, B., AND LEARMONTH, G. P. 1984. Information system as a competitive weapon. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1193-1201.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. IVES, B., AND OLSON, M. 1981. User involvement in information systems: A critical review of the empirical literature. CRIS 15, GBA 81-07, Center for Research on Information Systems, Graduate School of Business Administration, New York Univ., New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. IVES, B., HAMILTON, S., AND DAVIS, G. 1980. A framework for research in computer based management information systems. Manage. Sci. 26, 9, 910-934.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. JACKSON, M. 1983. Systems Development. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. JARDINE, D. A., AND REUBER, A. R. 1984. Information semantics and the conceptual schema. Inf. Syst. 9, 2, 147-156.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. JENKINS, A. M. 1983. Prototyping: A methodology for the design and development of application systems. Discussion Paper No. 227, Indiana Univ. Graduate School of Business, Division of Research, Bloomington.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. JUNG, C. G. 1931. Psychological types. In The Basic Writings of C. G. Jung. Modern Library, New York, pp. 183-285.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. KAHN, B. K. 1982. LDDM--A structured logical database design methodology. In Data Base Design Techniques I: Requirements and Logical Structures, S. B. Yao, S. B. Navathe, J. L. Weldon, and T. L. Kunii, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 31-55.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. KAY, R. H., SZYPERSKI, N., HORING, K., AND BARTZ, G. 1981. Stratefic planning of information systems at the corporate level. Inf. Manage. 3, 2, 175-186.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. KEEN, P. G. W. 1974. Toward behavioral methodology for the study of OR/MS implementation. Sloan Working Paper No. 701-74, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. KEEN, P. G. W. 1981a. Decision support systems: A research perspective. In Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, G. Fick and R. L. Sprague, Jr., Eds. Pergamon, Oxford, England, pp. 23-44.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. KEEN, P. G. W. 1981b. Information systems and organizational change. Commun. ACM 24, 1 ( J an.), 24-33.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. KEEN, P. G. W., AND SCOTT MORTON, M. S. 1978. Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. KENSINO, F. 1984. Towards evaluation of methods for property determination--A framework and critique of Yordon-DeMarco approach. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 325-338.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. KENT, W. 1978. Data and Reality. North-Holland, Amsterdam.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. KEROLA, P. 1980. On infological research into the systemeering process. In The Information Systems Environment, H. Lucas, F. Land, T. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 187-198.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. KEROLA, P., AND FREEMAN, P. 1981. A comparison of lifecycle models. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Engineering (San Diego, Calif., Mar.). IEEE, New York, pp. 1-10.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. KIMBROUGH, S. O., LEE, R. M., A~O NESS, D. 1984. Performative, informative and emotive systems: The first piece of the PIE. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems (Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28-30). Society for Management Information Systems, New York, pp. 28-30.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. KING, J. L. 1983. Centralized versus decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. A CM Cornput. Surv. 15, 4 (Dec.), 319-349.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. KING, J. L., AND KRAEMER, K. L. 1984. Evolution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nolan's stage model. Commun. ACM 27, 5 (May), 466-475.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. KING, J. L., ANO SCHREMS, E. L. 1978. Cost-benefit analysis in information systems development and operation. ACM Comput. Surv. 10, i (Mar.), 19-34.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. KING, W. R. 1978. Strategic planning for management information systems. MIS Q. 2, 1, 27-37.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. KLEIJNEN, J. P. C. 1980. Computers and Profits-- Quantifying Financial Benefits of Information System. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. KLEIN, H. K., AND HmSCHHEIM, R. A. 1983. Issues and approaches in appraising technological change in the office: A consequentalist perspective. Office Technol. People 2, 1, 15-42.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. KLEIN, H. K., AND HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. 1987. Social change and the future of information systems development. In Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, R. J. Boland and R. A. Hirschheim, Eds. Wiley, Chichester, England (to appear).]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. KLEIN, H. K., ANO WELKE, R. J. 1980. An evaluation of the Finnish PSC-systemeering (systems development) theory. In Report of the 3rd Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering Models, K. Lyytinen and E. Peltola, Eds. Univ. of Jyv~skylfi, Department of Computer Science, Jyv~iskylfi, Finland, pp. 2-37.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. KLING, R. 1980. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput. Surv. 12, I (Mar.), 61-110.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. KLING, R., AND IACONO, S. 1984. The control of information systems developments after implementation. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1218-1226.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. KLING, R., AND SCACCm, W. 1982. The social web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advan. Comput. 21, 2-90.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. KOLB, D. A., AND FROHMAN, A. L. 1970. An organization development approach to consulting. Sloan Manage. Rev. 11, 51-65.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. KUBICEK, H. 1983. User participation in system design: Some questions about the structure and content arising from recent research from a trade union perspective. In Systems Design for, with, and by the Users, U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3-18.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. KUMAR, K., AND WELKE, R. J. 1984. Implementation failure and system developer values. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on information Systems (Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 20-30), L. Maggi, J. L. King, and K. L. Kraemer, Eds. Society for Management Information Systems, New York, pp. 1-14.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. KUNG, C. H., AND $OLVBERG, A. 1984. An exercise in integrating database design tools. In Report of the 3rd Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modelling and Data Base Management, H. Kangassalo, Ed. Univ. of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, pp. 277-298.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. LAND, F. 1982. Adapting to changing user requirements. Inf. Manage. 5, 1, 59-75.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. LAND, F., MUMFORO, E., ANO HAWGO00, J. 1980. Training the systems analyst of the 1980s: Four analytical procedures to assist the design process. In The Information Systems Environment, H. Lucas, F. Land, T. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 239-256.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. LANDRY, M., AND LE MOIGNE, J.-L. 1977. Towards a theory of organizational information system-- A general system perspective. In information Processing 77, B. Gilchrist, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 801-805.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. LANGEFORS, B. 1973. Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. LANZARA, G. F. 1983. The design process: Frames, metaphors and games. In Systems Design for, with, and by the Users, U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 29-40.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. LANZARA, G. F., AND MATHIASSEN, L. 1985. Mapping situations within a system development project. Inf. Manage. 8, 1, 3-20.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. LEOGARO, H., SINGER, A., AND WHITESIOE, J. 1981. Directions in Human Factors for interactive Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. LEHMAN, M. M. 1980. Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proc. IEEE 68, 1060-1076.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. LEHMAN, M. M. 1984. Program evolution. Inf. Process. Manage. 20, 1-2, 19-36.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. LEHTINEN, E., AND LYYTINEN, K. 1986. Action based model of information system. Inf. Syst. 11, 4, 299-317.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. LEWIN, K. 1952. Group decision and social change. In Readings in Social Psychology, T. M. Newcomb and E. L. Hartley, Eds. Holt, New York, pp. 33O-344.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. LUCAS, H. C., JR. 1975. Why Information Systems Fail. Columbia University Press, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. LUCAS, H. C., JR. 1978. The evolution of an information system: From key-man to every person. Sloan Manage. Rev. 19, 2, 39-52.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. LUCAS, H. C., JR.. 1981. Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. LUNDEBERG, M., GOLDKUHL, G., AND NiLSSON, A. 1981. Information Systems Development--A Systematic Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. LYYTINEN, K. 1985. Implications of theories of language for information systems. MIS Q. 9, 1, 61-74.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. LYYTINEN, K. 1987a. Two views of information modeling. Inf. Manage. 11 (to appear).]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. LYYTINEN, K. 1987b. Information system failure: An exploratory survey of analysts' perceptions. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Jyvfiskylfi, Jyv'askyl~i, Finland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. LYYTINEN, K., AND HmSCHHEIM, R. A. 1987. Information system failures: A survey and classification of empirical literature. Oxford Surv. Inf. Technol. 4 (to appear).]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. LYYTINEN, K., AND LEHTINEN, E. 1984a. On information modeling through illocutionary logic. In Report of the 3rd Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modeling and Data Base Management, H. Kangassalo, Ed. Univ. of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, pp. 35-118.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. LYYTINEN, K., AND LEHTINEN, E. 1984b. Discourse analysis as an information system specification method. In Report of the 7th Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering (Part I). Helsinki Business School, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 146-200.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. MARCH, J. G., AND SIMON, H. A. 1958. Organizations. Wiley, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. MARKUS, M. L. 1983. Power, politics and MIS implementation. Commun. ACM 26, 6 (June), 430-444.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  163. MARKUS, M. L., AND PFEFFER, J. 1983. Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Account. Organ. Soc. 8, 2/3, 205-218.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. MARKUS, M. L., AND ROBEY, D. 1983. The organizational validity of management information systems. Human Relat. 36, 203-226.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. MARTIN, J. 1982. Application Development without Programmers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. MARTIN, J. 1983. Managing the Data-Base Environment. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. MARTIN, J. 1985. Computer science education today: A dialogue. Commun. ACM 28, 3 (Mar.), 251-255.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. MARX, K. 1976. Capital: a Critique of Political Economy (Transl. B. Fowkes), I-III. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England. (Vol. I first published 1867, vol. II 1885, vol. III 1894.)]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. MASON, R. O., AND MITROFF, I. I. 1973. A program for research on management information systems. Manage. Sci. 19, 5, 475-487.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. MASON, R. O., AND MITROFF, I. I. 1981. Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. Wiley, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. MATHIASSEN, L., AND ANDERSEN, P. B. 1983. Nurses and semiotics: The impact of EDP-based systems upon professional languages. In Report of the 6th Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, H. Nurminen and T. Gaupholm, Eds. Institute of Information Science, Univ. of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, pp. 227-262.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. MAYNTZ, R. 1984. Information systems and organizational effectiveness--A sociological perspective. in Beyond productivity: Information systems development for organizational effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 173-188.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. MCCRACKEN, D. D., ANO JACKSON, M. A. 1981. A minority dissenting position. In Systems Analysis and Design: A Foundation for the 1980s, W. W. Cotterman, J. D. Couger, N. L. Enger, and F. Harold, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 551-553.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. MITROFF, I. I. 1980. Toward a logic and methodology for real-world problems. In The Human Side of Information Processing, N. Bjorn-Andersen, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 187-195.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. MITROFF, I. i. 1982. Archetypal social systems analysis: On the deeper structure of human systems. Graduate School of Business, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. MITROFF, I. I., AND MASON, R. O. 1983. Can we design systems for managing messes? or why so many management information systems are uninformative. Account. Organ. Soc. 8, 2/3, 195-203.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. MORAN, T. P. 1981. An applied psychology of the user. ACM Comput. Surv. 13, 1 (Mar.), 1-11.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. MORGAN, H., AND SODEN, J. 1973. Understanding MIS failures. Data Base 5, 1.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. MUMFORD, E. 1981. Participative systems design: Structure and method. Syst. Objectives Solutions 1, 1, 5-19.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. MUMFORD, E. 1983. Designing Human Systems-- The ETHICS Method. Manchester Business School, Cheshire, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. MUMFORD, E. 1984. Participation--From Aristotle to Today. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 95-104.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. MUMFORD, E., HIRSCHHEIM, R. A., FITZGERALD, G., AND WOOD-HARPER, A. T., Eds. 1985. Research Methods in Information Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. NEWELL, A., AND SIMON, H. A. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. NOLAN, R. L. 1973. Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis. Commun. A CM 16, 7 (July), 399-405.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. NOLAN, R. L. 1977. Management Accounting and Control of Data Processing. National Association of Accountants, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. NOLAN, R. L. 1979. Managing the crisis in data processing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57, 3, 115-126.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. NOLAN, R. L. 1984. Managing the advanced stages of computer technology: Key research issues, in The Information Systems Research Challenge, F. W. McFarlan, Ed. Harvard University Press, Boston, Mass., pp. 195-215.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. NOLAN, R. L., AND WETHERBE, J. C. 1980. Towards a comprehensive framework for MIS research. MIS Q. 4, 2, 1-20.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. NUNAMAKER, J. F., AND KONNSYNSKI, B. 1981. Formal and automated techniques of systerns analysis and design. In Systems Analysis and Design--A Foundation for the 1980's, W. W. Cotterman, J. D. Couger, N. L. Enger, and F. Harold, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 291-320.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. NYGAARD, K. 1983. Partition in systems development--The tasks ahead. In Systems Design {or, with and by the Users. U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 15-25.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. NYGAARD, K., AND HANDLYKKEN, P. 1981. The systems development process--Its setting, some problems and needs for methods, in Software Engineering Environment, H. Hunke, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 157-172.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. OLERUP, A. 1980. On a contingency framework of computerized information systems. In The Informarion Systems Environment, H. C. Lucas, F. F. Land, T. J. Lincoln, and K. Supper, Eds. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 83-94.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. OLLE, T. W., SOL, H. G., AND VERRIJN-STUART, A. A., Eds. 1982. Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review. North- Holland, Amsterdam.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  194. OLLE, T. W., SOL, H. G., AND VERRIJN*STUART, A. A., Eds. 1983. Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis. North- Holland, Amsterdam.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. OUCHI, W. G. 1978. Coupled versus uncoupled control in organizational hierarchies. In Environments and Organizations, M. W. Meyer, Ed. Jossey/Bass, San Francisco, Calif.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. OUCHI, W. G. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manage. Sc~ 25, 9, 833-848.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. OUCHI, W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Admin. Sc~ Q. 25, 129-141.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. PARNAS, D. L., ANO CLEMENTS, P. C. 1985. A rational design process: How and why fake it. in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Theory and Practice of Software Development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  199. PEARSON, S. 1977. Measurement of computer user satisfaction. Ph.D. dissertation. Arizona State Univ., Tempe.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  200. PETERSON, J. L. 1977. Petri nets. ACM Comput. Surv. 9, 3 (Sept.), 223-259.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. POWERS, R. F., ANO DICKSON, G. W. 1973. MIS project management: Myths, opinions and reality. California Manage. Rev. 15, 3, 147-156.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. ROBEY, D. 1984. Conflict models for implementation research. In Management Science Implementation, R. L. Schultz, Ed. American Elsevier, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. ROBEY, D., AND MARKUS, M. L. 1984. Rituals in system design. MIS Q. 8, 1, 5-15.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. ROCHFELO, A., AND TARDIEU, H. 1983. MERISE: An information system design and development methodology. Inf. Manage. 6, 143-159.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  205. ROCKART, J. F. 1979. Critical success factors. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57, 2, 81-91.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  206. ROCKART, J. F., AND CRESCENZI, A. D. 1984. Engaging top management in information technology. Sloan Manage. Rev. 26, 1, 3-16.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  207. ROSENSERG, R. L. 1980. Incomprehensible computer systems: Knowledge without wisdom. Master's thesis, Laboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  208. ROSENHEAD, J., ANO THUNHURST, C. 1982. A materialist analysis of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 33, 1, 111-122.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  209. ROSS, D. T. 1977. Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3, 1, 16-34.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. ROSS, D. T. 1985. Applications and extensions of SADT. Computer 3, 4, 25-34.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. ROSS, D. T., ANO SCHOMAN, K. E., JR. 1977. Structured analysis for requirements definition. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3, 1, 6-15.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  212. SANOBERG, A., Ed. 1979. Computers Dividing Man and Work. Arbetslivscentrum, MalmS, Sweden.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  213. SANDBERO, A. 1985. Socio-technical design, tradeunion strategies and action research. In Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford, R. A. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 79-92.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. SCACCHI, W. 1984. Managing software engineering projects: A social analysis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 10, 1, 49-59.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  215. SCHNEIDER, L., AND CIBORRA, C. 1983. Technology bargaining in Norway. In Systems Design for, with, and by the Users, U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 243-250.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  216. SEARLE, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts--An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  217. SEARLE, J. R. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. SEN-83, Letter from the Editor. 1983. Computers and human safety. Softw. Eng. Notes 8, 5, 1-9.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. SENKO, M. 1975. Information systems, records, relations, sets, entities, and things. In{. Syst. 1, 1, 3-13.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  220. SENKO, M. 1977. Conceptual schemas, abstract data structures, enterprise descriptions. In International Computing Conference 77, H. Morlet and J. Ribbens, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 82-102.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. SENN, J. A. 1978. A management view of systems analysts: Failures and shortcomings. MIS Q. 2, 3, 25-32.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  222. SENN, J. A. 1979. Enhancing the user interface: A research problem in computer-based information systems. WP 79-01, School of Management, State Univ. of New York at Binghamton.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  223. SENN, J. A. 1980. Management's assessment of computer information systems. J. Syst. Manage. 11, 9, 6-11.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  224. SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1981. Software Psychology-- Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems. Winthrop, Cambridge, Mass.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  225. SLUIZER, S., AND CASHMAN, P. M. 1984. XCP: An experimental tool for supporting office procedures. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Office Automation (Silver Spring, Md., Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 73-80.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  226. SORENSEN, R. E., ANO ZANO, D. E. 1975. Improving the implementation of OR/MS models by applying the Lewin-Schein theory of change. In Implementing Operations Research/Management Science, R. L. Schultz and D. P. Slevin, Eds. American Elsevier, New York, pp. 217-236.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  227. STACHOWITZ, R. A. 1985. A formal framework for describing and classifying semantic data models. Inf. Syst. 10, 1, 77-96.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  228. STAMPER, R. 1984. A logic of social norms and individual affordances: A proposal arising from an investigation in the field of computer and law. Working Paper, London School of Economics, Univ. of London, London.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  229. STAMPER, R. 1985. Management epistemology: Garbage in, garbage out (and what about deontology and axiology). In Knowledge Representation for Decision Support Systems, L. B. Methlie and R. H. Sprague, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 55-77.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  230. STAMPER, R. 1986. A logic of social norms for the semantics of business information. In Database Semantics (DS-1), T. B. Steel and R. Meersman, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 233-253.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  231. SWANSON, B. E. 1984. Organizational designs for software maintenance. In Proceedings of the 5th International Con{erence on Information Systems, (Tucson, Az., Nov. 28-30), L. Maggi, J. L. King, and K. L. Kraemer, Eds. Society for Management Information Systems, New York, pp. 73-82.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  232. SULLIVAN, C. H. 1985. Systems planning in the information age. Sloan Manage. Rev. 27, 1, 3-11.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  233. TAGGART, W. M., AND THARP, M. O. 1977. A survey of information requirements analysis techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. 9, 4 (Dec.), 273-290.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  234. TEICHROEW, D., ANO HERSHEY, E. A. 1977. PSL/ PSA: A computer aided technique for structured documentation and analysis of information processing systems. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. 3, 1, 48-58.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  235. TEICHROEW, D., MACASOVlC, P., HERSHEY, E. A., IIi, ANO YAMAMOTO, Y. 1980. Application of the entity-relationship approach to information processing systems modeling. In Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, P. P. Chen, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 15-36.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  236. THORESEN, K. 1984. Systemutvikling--Produkt og process. Rapport Nr. 747, Norsk Regnecentral, Blindern, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. TRIST, E. L. 1981. The sociotechnical perspective. In Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, A. H. van de Ven and W. F. Joyce, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 19-75.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  238. TSICHRITZlS, D., ANO LOCHOVSKY, F. 1982. Data Models. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  239. TURNER, J. A. 1982. Observations on the use of behavioral models in information systems research and practice. In{. Manage. 5, 3, 207-213.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  240. ULRICH, W. 1981. A critique of pure cybernetic reason: The Chilean experience with cybernetics. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 8, 33-59.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  241. ULRICH, W. 1983. Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Verlag Haupt, Bern, Switzerland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  242. VAN GRIETHUYSEN, J. J., Ed. 1982. Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base. ISO/TC97/SC5/WG3, ISO/TC97 Computers and Information Processing, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  243. VERRIJN-STUART, A. 1979. The past and future of information systems. In Euro IFIP 79. North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 153-161.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  244. VITALARI, N. P. 1984. Critical assessment of structured analysis methods: A psychological perspective. In Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Th. M. A. Bemelmans, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 421-434.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  245. WASSERMAN, A. I. 1980. Software tools and the user software engineering project. Tech. Rep. 46, Laboratory of Medical Information Science, Univ. of California, San Francisco.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  246. WASSERMAN, A. I. 1982. The user software engineering methodology: An overview. In In{ormarion Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, T. Olle, H. Sol, and A. Verrijn-Stuart, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 591-628.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  247. WASSERMAN, A. I., AND FREEMAN, P. 1983. ADA methodologies: Concepts and requirements. Softw. Eng. Notes 8, 1, 33-50, ACM SIGSOFT.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  248. WATERS, S. J. 1974. Computer-aided methodology of computer systems design. Comput. J. 17, 3, 211-215.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  249. WEONER, P. 1982. Reflections on capital-intensive software technology. So{tw. Eng. Notes 7, 4, 24-33.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  250. WEICK, K. E. 1984. Theoretical assumptions and research methodology selection. In The Information Systems Research Challenge, F. W. Mc- Farlan, Ed. Harvard University Press, Boston, Mass., pp. 111-132.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  251. WELKE, R. J. 1978. Information system effectiveness evaluation (ISEE). ISRAM PP-7806-1.1, Faculty of Business, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  252. WELKE, R. J. 1981. IS/DSS: DBMS support for information systems development. ISRAM WP- 8105-1.0, Faculty of Business, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  253. WIEDERHOLD, G. 1977. Database Design, McGraw- Hill, Tokyo.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  254. WILLIAMSON, 0. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  255. WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econ. 22, 2, 233-261.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  256. WILLIAMSON, O. E., AND OUCHI, W. G. 1981. The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. In Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, A. H. van de Ven and W. F. Joyce, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 347-370.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  257. WINOGRAD, T., AND FLORES, F. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation {or Design. Ablex, Norwood, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  258. WITTGENSTEgN, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  259. WONDERLICH, D. 1979. Foundations of Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. (German original 1974.)]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  260. WUTHNOW, R., HUNTER, J. D., BERGESEN, A., AND KURZWEIL, E. 1984. Cultural Analysis. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  261. YADAV, S. B. 1983. Determining an organization's information requirements: A state of the art survey. Data Base 14, 2, 3-20.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  262. YAO, S. B., NAVATHE, S. B., AND WELDON, J.-L. 1982. An integrated approach to database design. In Data Base Design Techniques: Requirements and Logical Structures, S. B. Yao, S. B. Navathe, J. L. Weldon, and T. L. Kunii, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  263. YORDON, E. 1982. Managing the System Life Cycle. Yourdon Press, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Computing Surveys
    ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 19, Issue 1
    March 1987
    87 pages
    ISSN:0360-0300
    EISSN:1557-7341
    DOI:10.1145/28865
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 1987 ACM

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 March 1987
    Published in csur Volume 19, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader