skip to main content
10.1145/2896387.2896416acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Combined Operations of Mobility and NAT Management on the Horizontal Model of Software-Defined Networking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

MIPv4 and MIPv6 protocols, which are based on the vertical mobility management model, are network layer functions providing pre-call and mid-call mobility management for mobile nodes. The presence of non-standardized Network Address Translation (NAT) devices and widespread use of private addresses cause NAT traversal issues when a mobile node, which operates with a vertical model of network functions, changes its private IP address during a session. The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) raises the horizontal model, where the network functions are integrated and controlled over control plane. In this dissertation, we propose an Overlay Network Controller-centric (ONC) horizontal model mobility management, which operates for mobile nodes behind NAT devices. The proposed ONC-centric horizontal model mobility management is an early adaptation of the horizontal model of network functions on the control layer, which has the combined functions of NAT management and mobility management. Also, the proposed ONC-centric horizontal model mobility management guarantees an easier way to handle the NAT management and mobility management together. Finally, this paper compares the proposed ONC-centric horizontal mobility management with the existing mobility management solutions with respect to advantages and layer 3 handover latency.

References

  1. S. Salsano, A. Polidoro, C. Mingardi, S. Niccolini, and L. Veltri. SIP-based mobility management in next generation networks. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 15(2):92--99, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Perkins. IP Mobility Support for IPv4. RFC 3344 (Proposed Standard), August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko. Mobility Support in IPv6. RFC 3775 (Proposed Standard), June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Khlifi, J. Gregoire, and J. Phillips. Voip and nat/firewalls: issues, traversal techniques, and a real-world solution. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 44(7):93--99, July 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Maenpaa, V. Andersson, Gonzalo Camarillo, and A. Keranen. Impact of network address translator traversal on delays in peer-to-peer session initiation protocol. In Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010 IEEE, pages 1--6, Dec 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Demestichas, A. Georgakopoulos, D. Karvounas, K. Tsagkaris, V. Stavroulaki, Jianmin Lu, Chunshan Xiong, and Jing Yao. 5g on the horizon: Key challenges for the radio-access network. Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE, 8(3):47--53, Sept 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hani Jamjoom, Dan Williams, and Upendra Sharma. Don't call them middleboxes, call them middlepipes. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, HotSDN '14, pages 19--24, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Hata. A study of requirements for sdn switch platform. In Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems (ISPACS), 2013 International Symposium on, pages 79--84, Nov 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Peng Xiao, Wenyu Qu, Heng Qi, Zhiyang Li, and Yujie Xu. The sdn controller placement problem for wan. In Communications in China (ICCC), 2014 IEEE/CIC International Conference on, pages 220--224, Oct 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lixia Zhang. A retrospective view of network address translation. Network, IEEE, 22(5):8--12, September 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Khlifi, J. Gregoire, and J. Phillips. VoIP and NAT/firewalls: issues, traversal techniques, and a real-world solution. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 44(7):93--99, July 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Open Networking Foundation. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Definition, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Kreutz, F.M.V. Ramos, P. Esteves Verissimo, C. Esteve Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig. Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1):14--76, Jan 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. H. Fathi, S.S. Chakraborty, and R. Prasad. Optimization of Mobile IPv6-Based Handovers to Support VoIP Services in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks. Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 56(1):260--270, Jan 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Combined Operations of Mobility and NAT Management on the Horizontal Model of Software-Defined Networking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICC '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing
      March 2016
      535 pages
      ISBN:9781450340632
      DOI:10.1145/2896387

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 March 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate213of590submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader