skip to main content
10.1145/2899415.2899460acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lessons Learned on Computer Science Teachers Professional Development

Published:11 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an introductory Computer Science (CS) Professional Development (PD) course for K-12 teachers in Argentina that integrates pedagogical content knowledge and teacher classroom practice. We analyzed teachers' learning of what CS entails and the implementation of inquirybased programming lessons in their schools. Based on pre and post teachers surveys and classroom observations, we found that most teachers learned about the CS object of study and about fundamental programming concepts such as conditionals, loops, variables, etc. Teachers were more likely to replicate the same activities they experienced during PD workshops in their classrooms than to produce their own. Teachers who had a previous background on CS provided in-depth explanations of CS concepts to their students while other teachers superficially introduced the content knowledge. We describe PD activities and characteristics that could explain teachers' learning and incorporation of programming lessons. Findings imply that a PD program that integrates pedagogical content knowledge and teachers classroom practice can effectively improve inquiry-based CS teaching, but may be insufficient preparation for teachers with no previous background on CS.

References

  1. L. Benotti, M. J. Gomez, and C. Martinez. UNC++ Duino: Learning to program in Python and C++ starting from blocks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robotics in Education, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Benotti, M. C. Martínez, and F. Schapachnik. Engaging high school students using chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 63--68, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Cuny. Finding 10,000 teachers. CSTA Voice, 5(6):1--2, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Ericson, M. Guzdial, and M. Biggers. Improving secondary CS education: progress and problems. In SIGCSE Bulletin, volume 39, pages 298--301, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. A. Ertmer. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational technology research and development, 53(4):25--39, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. S. Garet, A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. What makes PD effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4):915--945, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Goode. If you build teachers, will students come? the role of teachers in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1):65--88, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. Lang, R. Galanos, J. Goode, D. Seehorn, F. Trees, P. Phillips, and C. Stephenson. Bugs in the system: CS teacher certification in the US. The CSTA and The ACM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. C. Martinez and M. E. Echeveste. Representaciones de estudiantes de primaria y secundaria sobre las ciencias de la computación y su oficio. Revista de Educación a Distancia, (46), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Mishra and M. Koehler. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6):1017--1054, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Mühling, P. Hubwieser, and T. Brinda. Exploring teachers' attitudes towards object oriented modelling and programming in secondary schools. In Proc of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research, pages 59--68. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Ni and M. Guzdial. Who am I?: understanding high school CS teachers' professional identity. In Proc of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 499--504. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Ragonis, O. Hazzan, and J. Gal-Ezer. A survey of computer science teacher preparation programs in israel tells us: computer science deserves a designated high school teacher preparation! In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 401--405. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Thompson and T. Bell. Adoption of new CS high school standards by New Zealand teachers. In Proc of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, pages 87--90. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Windschitl and K. Sahl. Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American educational research journal, 39(1):165--205, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Lessons Learned on Computer Science Teachers Professional Development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
      July 2016
      394 pages
      ISBN:9781450342315
      DOI:10.1145/2899415

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITiCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate56of147submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader